Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Contributi originali

No. 1 (2021)

Chat-Based Group Psychotherapy: The beginning of our experience in the cyberspace

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/gruoa1-2021oa14030
Submitted
ottobre 16, 2021
Published
2022-07-11

Abstract

The present article aims to present and reflect upon the experience of the transition from live (in-person) group psychotherapy to online chat-based group psychotherapy.
This shift was made owing to the global pandemic arising from the diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The state of emergency has obliged mental health professionals to adapt their working means so as to ensure continuity of their psychotherapy practice. The transition to this telecommunication-based modality entailed the need to assess which actions were to be taken in order to restructure online group psychotherapy. To this end, it proved useful to define new rules of the setting and to make changes to the manner in which group psychotherapy was conducted.
The reflections presented in this article do not claim to be exhaustive, but rather intend to open a discussion about the difficulties and the possibilities offered by chat-based group psychotherapy.

References

  1. Algeri D., Gabri S. e Mazzucchelli L. (2018). Consulenza psicologica online: esperienze pratiche, linee guida e ambiti di intervento. Firenze: Giunti Psychometrics.
  2. Ambrosiano I., Druetta V., Pisterzi A. e Gullo S. (2020). La relazione clinica mediata dallo schermo nella psicoterapia di gruppo online. Gruppi, XXI, 2: 91-105. DOI: 10.3280/gruoa2-2020oa12583.
  3. Barak A. e Grohol J.M. (2011). Current and Future Trends in Internet-Supported Mental Health Interventions. J. of Technology in Human Services, 29, 3: 155-196. DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2011.616939.
  4. Barak A. e Wander-Schwartz M. (2000). Empirical Evaluation of Brief Group Therapy Conducted in an Internet Chat Room. J. of Virtual Environments, 5, 1: 1-9.
  5. Barak A., He L., Boniel-Nissi M. e Shapira N.A. (2008). A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions. J. of Technology in Human Services, 26, 2-4: 109-160. DOI: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
  6. Bauer S., Wolf M., Haug S. e Kordy H. (2011). The Effectiveness of Internet Chat Groups in Relapse Prevention after Inpatient Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 2: 219-226. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2010.547530.
  7. Bisen S.S. e Deshpande Y.M. (2018). Effectiveness of Internet Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention in Common Psychiatric Disorders. International J. of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 8, 2: 51-62. DOI: 10.4018/IJCBPL.2018040104.
  8. Bleger J. (1967). Simbiosis y ambigüedad, estudio psicoanalitico. Buenos Aires: Editioral Paidòs (trad. it.: Simbiosi e ambiguità. Studio psicoanalitico. Roma: Armando, 2010).
  9. de Bitencourt Machado D.,Braga Laskoski P., Trelles Severo C., Margareth Siqueira Bassols A., Sfoggia A., Kowacs C., Valle Krieger D., Benetti Torres M., Bento Gastaud M., Stella Wellausen R., Teche S. e Laks Eizirik C. (2016). A Psychodynamic Perspective on a Systematic Review of Online Psychotherapy for Adults. British J. of Psychotherapy, 32, 1: 79-108. DOI: 10.1111/bjp.12204.
  10. Giannone F., Guarnaccia C., Gullo S., Di Blasi M., Giordano C., Lo Coco G. e Burlingame G. (2020). Italian Adaptation of the Group Questionnaire: Validity and Factorial Structure. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 23, 2: 133-144. DOI: 10.4081/rippo.2020.443.
  11. Golkaramnay V., Bauer S., Haug S., Wolf M. e Kordy H. (2007). The Exploration of the Effectiveness of Group Therapy Through an Internet Chat as Aftercare: A Controlled Naturalistic Study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 76, 4: 219-225. DOI: 10.1159/000101500.
  12. Hoermann S., McCabe K.L., Milne D.N. e Calvo R.A. (2017). Application of Synchronous Text-Based Dialogue Systems in Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review. J. of Medical Internet Tesearch, 19, 8: e267. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7023.
  13. Krogel J.A. (2008). “The Group Questionnaire: A New Measure of the Group Relationship”. All Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1732. http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd.
  14. Krogel J., Burlingame G., Chapman C., Renshaw T., Gleave R., Beecher M. e MacNair-Semands R. (2013). The Group Questionnaire: A Clinical and Empirically Derived Measure of Group Relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 3: 344-354. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2012.729868.
  15. Lester D. (2006). E-therapy: Caveats from Experiences with Telephone Therapy. Psychological Reports, 99, 3: 894-896. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.99.3.894-896.
  16. Marmarosh C.L. e Sproul A. (2021). Group Cohesion: Empirical Evidence from Group Psychotherapy for Those Studying Other Areas of Group Work. In: Parks C.D. e Tasca G.A., Eds., The Psychology of Groups: The Intersection of Social Psychology and Psychotherapy Research. American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/0000201-010.
  17. Marogna C., Pavan F., Furin A. e Silvestri A. (2019). I soci COIRAG e le nuove tecnologie: un’inchiesta della rivista Gruppi. Gruppi, XX,1: 133-143. DOI: 10.3280/GRU2019-001010.
  18. Marzi A. (2013). Psicoanalisi, identità e Internet. Esplorazioni nel Cyberspace. Roma: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Pines M. (1998). Circular Reflections: Selected Papers. London: Jessica Kingsley (trad. it.: Riflessioni circolari. Roma: Borla, 2000).
  20. Sabbadini A. (2014). New Technologies and Psychoanalytic Setting. In: Lemma A. e Caparotta L., Psychoanalysis in the TechnocultureEra. London: Routledge.
  21. Silvestri A. e Ferruzza E. (2012). Originalità e valore euristico del pensiero di Ferdinando Vanni sulla psicoterapia di gruppo. Gruppi, XIV, 1: 51-77. DOI: 10.3280/GRU2012-001005.
  22. Suler J. (1999). The Psychology of Avatars and Graphical Space in Multimedia Chat Communities. The Psychology of cyberspace. Testo disponibile al sito: http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psycyber.html.
  23. Tjelta S. (2020). Ceci n’est pas une pipe: From the Circle to the Screen – Using Video-links to do GA? Contexts, 88, Summer. Retrieved from https://groupanalyticsociety.co.uk/contexts/issue-88/articles/ceci-nest-pas-une-pipefrom-the-circle-to-the-screen-using-video-links-to-do-ga/.
  24. Topooco N., Berg M., Johansson S., Liljethörn L., Radvogin E., Vlaescu G., Bergman Nordgren L., Zetterqvist M. and Andersson G. (2018). Chat-and Internet-Based Cognitive – Behavioural Therapy in Treatment of Adolescent Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial. BJPsych open, 4, 4: 199-207. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2018.18.
  25. Weinberg H. (2020). Online Group Psychotherapy: Challenges and Possibilities During COVID-19 – A Practice Review. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24, 3: 201-211. DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000140.
  26. Zerwas S.C., Watson H.J., Hofmeier S.M., Levine M.D., Hamer R.M., Crosby R. D., Runfola C.D., Peat C.M., Shapiro J.R., Zimmer B., Moessner M., Kordy H., Marcus M.D. andBulik C.M. (2017). CBT4BN: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Chat and Face-to-Face Group Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 86, 1: 47-53. DOI: 10.1159/000449025.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...