Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi e ricerche

V. 8 N. 1 (2023): Didattica innovativa e faculty development: dimensioni teoriche e operative

Coltivare creatività pratica e pensiero critico in Higher Education. Elementi di analisi per una geografia concettuale

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa1-2023oa16040
Inviata
12 giugno 2023
Pubblicato
20-06-2023

Abstract

Il contributo propone una riflessione sul tema dello sviluppo di competenze di pensiero critico e creativo in Higher Education, con particolare riferimento a studenti e studentesse nell’ambito dell’educazione e della formazione.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Barron, F. (1995). No Rootless Flower: An Ecology of Creativity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
  2. Bennett, N., Lemoine, J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2).
  3. Bell, H. (2023). Insegnare il pensiero critico. Saggezza pratica, tr. it. Milano: Meltemi.
  4. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 1. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  5. Bosio, A. C. (2017), Neoprofessionalismo, transdisciplinarità: come riconfigurare l’orientamento alla professione?. In La scienza come vocazione, Studium, 544-554.
  6. Bracci, F., Romano, A., & Marsick, V. (2022). A practice-based view of transformative learning. The case of a craft organisation. In: E. Kostara, A. Gavrielatos, & D. Loads. Transformative Learning Theory and Praxis. New Perspectives and Pos-sibilities (pp. 201-231). New York: Routledge.
  7. Bruni, A., & Parolin, L. L. (2014). Dalla produzione automatizzata agli ambienti tecnologicamente densi: la dimensione sociomateriale dell’agire organizzativo. Studi Organizzativi, 7-26.
  8. Bruni, A., Pinch, T., Schubert, C. (2013). Technologically Dense Environments: What For? What Next?. Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 4: 51-72.
  9. Butera, F. (2020a). Organizzazione e società. Innovare le organizzazioni dell’Italia che vogliamo. Venezia: Marsilio.
  10. Butera F. (2020b). Le condizioni organizzative e professionali dello smart working dopo l’emergenza: progettare il lavoro ubiquo fatto di ruoli aperti e di professioni a larga banda. Studi organizzativi, 1: 142-166.
  11. Chickering, A.W., Gamson, Z. (fall 1987). Seven principles for good practices in undergraduate education. Washington Center News, 1-7.
  12. Colombo, E., & Rebughini, P. (2016). Intersectionality and beyond. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 57(3): 439-460.
  13. Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Davidson, C. N. (2011). Now you see it. New York: Penguin Group.
  15. Fabbri, L., & Giampaolo, M. (2021). Educatori designer e maker. Trasformazioni in atto per una professione del fare. NUOVA SECONDARIA, 5-20.
  16. Fabbri, L., & Romano, A. (2021) Intersezionalità e pratiche professionali. PROFES-SIONI DELL’EDUCAZIONE E DELLA FORMAZIONE, 197-210.
  17. Fedeli, M. (2016). Coinvolgere gli studenti nelle pratiche didattiche: potere, dialogo e partecipazione. In M. Fedeli, V. Grion, & D. Frison (Eds.). Coinvolgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione (pp.113-142). Lec-ce: Pensa Multimedia.
  18. Fedeli, M., & Taylor, E.W. (2016). Exploring the impact of a teacher study group in an Italian university. Formazione & Insegnamento, XIV(3): 2279-7505.
  19. Fedeli, M., Mapelli, D., & Mariconda, C. (2020). Teaching4Learning@ Unipd. L’innovazione didattica all’Università di Padova. Teorie, ricerche e pratiche (Vol. 1). Padova University Press.
  20. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM. A practical guide. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass.
  21. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111: 8410-8415.
  22. Gherardi, S., & Perrotta, M. (2014), Between the hand and the head: How things get done, and how in doing the ways of doing are discovered. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 9(2): 134-150.
  23. Gherardi, S., & Perrotta, M. (2013), Doing by inventing the way of doing: Formative-ness as the linkage of meaning and matter. Organization Studies, 227-259.
  24. Gherardi S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  25. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the crea-tive individual. Cham/Heidelberger: Springer International Publishing.
  26. Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1): 48-67.
  27. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New ideas in psychology, 28(1): 79-93.
  28. Grion, V., & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds.) (2013). Student Voice. Prospettive internazionali e pratiche emergenti in Italia. Milano: Guerini Editore.
  29. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York: Routledge.
  30. Hirschhorn, L. (1990). The workplace within: Psychodynamics of organizational life. MIT press.
  31. Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tr. it. 2006. L’apprendimento situato. Dall’osservazione alla partecipazione attiva nei contesti sociali. Trento: Erickson.
  32. Mezirow J. (2006), An overview of transformative learning. In Sutherland P., Crowther J. (ed.). Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts (24-38). New York: Routledge.
  33. Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in Physiology Education, 30: 159-167. doi: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
  34. Noordegraaf M. (2007). From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism present-day profes-sionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39(6): 761-785.
  35. Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud and L. Molloy (Eds.). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: understanding it and doing it well (pp. 34-49). Oxon: Routledge.
  36. Kember, D. (2009). Promoting student-centered forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education, 58(1): 1-13.
  37. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorm. Children, computers, ad powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Tr. it. Mindstorm. Bambini, computer e creatività. Milano: Emme, 1984.
  38. Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (2003). Group creativity: An Introduction. In Paulus P., & Nijstad B. (eds.). Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (pp. 3-11). New York: Oxford University Press.
  39. Poell, R., Yorks, L., & Marsick, V. J. (2009). Organizational project-based learning in work contexts. A cross-cultural analysis of data from two projects. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(1): 77-93.
  40. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93: 223-231.
  41. Resnick, M. (2018). Come i bambini: immagina, crea, gioca e condividi. Coltivare la creatività con il Lifelong Kindergarten del MIT. Trento: Erickson.
  42. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Yale University Press.
  43. Shani, A. B., Guerci, M., & Cirella, S. (eds.) (2014). Collaborative management research. Teoria, metodi, esperienze. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  44. St. Pierre, E. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new mate-rialisms, and post qualitative inquiry. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina M. (eds.). Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75-95). Walnut Grove, CA: Left Coast Press.
  45. Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999-2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2): 173-191.
  46. Tino, C., & Fedeli, M. (2022). Career planning, proactivity, self-employability, and labour market: undergraduates’ perceptions. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 22(1): 262-278.
  47. Tore, R., Tino, C., & Fedeli, M. (2021). Podcast team-based project in Higher Educa-tion: percezione di studenti e studentesse. RICERCA e DIDATTICA, 9, 122.
  48. Watkins C., Eileen C., Lodge C. (2007). Effective learning in classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  49. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
  50. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard business press.
  51. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tr. it. 2006. Comunità di pratica. Apprendimento, significato e identità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  52. World Economic Forum (2020, January). Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  53. Yorke M., Knight P. T. (2004). Embedding employability into the curriculum. Learning and Employability into the curriculum, 3: 1-28.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...