Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi e ricerche

V. 8 N. 1 (2023): Didattica innovativa e faculty development: dimensioni teoriche e operative

Hybrid Blended Learning Solution for Teacher Education Innovation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa1-2023oa16039
Inviata
12 giugno 2023
Pubblicato
20-06-2023

Abstract

The study reports data from the implementation of hybrid blended learning solutions (HBLS) in initial teacher training programmes for pre-school and primary school teachers. The design of the relevant university courses were revised in a transformative way, using innovative and digitally integrated approaches (DM 289/2021). Twenty teacher educators and 364 students were involved through the administration of semi-structured questionnaires whose dimensions investigated organizational flexibility to facilitate work-life balance processes, methodological quality and the role of teachers in HBLS.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 67-74. Doi: 10.14742/ajet.693.
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and Methodological Issues for the Conceptualization, Development, and Assessment of ICT-TP-CK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168.
  3. Bell, M. (2020). The fundamentals of teaching: A five-step model to put the research evidence into practice. Routledge. Doi: 10.4324/9780429342318.
  4. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18.
  5. Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., & Vanslambrouck, S. (2021). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 48-57. Doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772.
  6. Calvani, A., & Marzano, A. (2020). Progettare per un miglioramento basato su evidenze. Quale metodologia?. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa-IJEduR, 24, 67-83. Doi: 10.7346/SIRD-012020-P67.
  7. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Pfeiffer & Wiley. Doi: 10.1002/pfi.4930450920.
  8. De Rossi M., Fedeli M. (eds.) (2022). Costruire percorsi di faculty development. Pensamultimedia.
  9. De Rossi, M., & Trevisan, O. (2022). Innovare la didattica universitaria con Hybrid Blended Learning Solution: Una ricerca design-based project per la formazione iniziale degli insegnanti. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(3), 475-490. Doi: 10.7346/-fei-XX-03-22_33.
  10. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 1, 3-21. Pfeiffer Publishing.
  11. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Routledge. Doi: 10.4324/9780203887332.
  12. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K., & Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D. (Eds), Blended Learning: Research perspectives, pp. 111-144. Sloan Consortium.
  13. Manca, S., & Delfino, M. (2021). Adapting educational practices in emergency remote education: Continuity and change from a student perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1394-1413.
  14. Marzano, A. & Calvani, A. (2020). Evidence Based Education e didattica efficace: come integrare conoscenze metodologiche e tecnologiche nella formazione degli insegnanti. ECPS Journal, 22, 125-143. Doi: 10.7358/ecps-2020-022-maca.
  15. Mishra, P., & Koehler M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: a Framework for Integrating Technology in Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  16. Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Education Tech Research & Development, 67, 1145-1174. Doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8.
  17. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(3), 577. Doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9492-z.
  18. Trentin, G. (2015). Orientating pedagogy towards Hybrid spaces. In Nata, R. V. (Ed.), Progress in education, 35, pp. 105-124. Nova Science Publisher Inc.
  19. Trevisan, O., & De Rossi, M. (2022). Accessibility in Blended Learning and Hybrid Solutions at Higher Education Level: A Word from the Students. In Studium (Ed). Helmeto 2022 – Book of abstract, pp. 107-110.
  20. Trevisan, O., De Rossi, M., Grion, V. (2021). The positive in the tragic: Covid pandemic as an impetus for change in teaching and assessment in higher education. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 69-76.
  21. Zhang, L., Carter Jr., R. A., Qian, X., Yang, S., Rujimora, J., Wen, S. (2022). Academia’s responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 620-646.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...