Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1 Special Issue (2025)

Post-critical Pedagogy and Social Justice. Thing Avoidance or Trust in the World

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/erpoa1SI-2025oa19364
Submitted
febbraio 10, 2025
Published
2025-11-18

Abstract

This article explores the complex relationship between education, democracy, and social justice, challenging the dominant view that education should serve as an instrument for achieving political goals, including equity and inclusion. Drawing on post-critical educational theories, particularly the works of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière, the authors argue that education is an autonomous, intergenerational practice centered on introducing newcomers to the common world, fostering love and care for it, and enabling its renewal. The instrumentalization of education for social justice, they contend, undermines its essence by prioritizing critique over affirmation and imposing anti-educational practices like censorship and stultification. Similarly, the article criticizes the conflation of democracy with social justice, emphasizing that democracy is rooted in radical equality and collective deliberation around shared concerns, rather than the rectification of historical injustices. Ultimately, the authors advocate for a “thing-centered” approach to education and democracy, grounded in trust in the world and its shared durability.

References

  1. Applebaum, B. (2010) Being White, Being Good: White Complicity, White Moral Responsibility, and Social Justice Pedagogy. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  2. Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Arendt, H. (1961) The Crisis in Education. In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. The Viking Press: New York.
  4. Badiou, A. (2005) Being and Event. Continuum: London-New York.
  5. Hansen, M.H. (2021) The Nature of Athenian Democracy. In D. Piovan, G. Giorgini (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 27-56.
  6. Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  7. Latour, B. (2005) From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public. In B. Latour, P. Weibel (eds.). Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge MA-London: The MIT Press.
  8. Ober, J. (2017) Demopolis. Democracy Before Liberalism in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. OECD (2023). Equity and Inclusion in Education: Finding Strength through Diversity. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/e9072e21-en.
  10. Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
  11. Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-agreement. Politics and philosophy, Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
  12. Rancière, J. (2001). Ten Theses on Politics. Theory & Event, 5(3), pp. 1-16.
  13. Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.
  14. Toria-Kelly, D. (2017). Rancière and the re-distribution of the sensible: The artist Rosanna Raymond, dissensus and postcolonial sensibilities within the spaces of the museum. Progress in Human Geography, 43(1), pp. 123-140.
  15. Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against Elections. The Case for Democracy. London: The Bodley Head.
  16. Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2019). Towards an Ontology of Teaching. Thingcentred Pedagogy, Affirmation and Love for the World. Cham: Springer.
  17. Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2022). Teacherly gestures as an ontological dimension of politics: On the need of commonising in an age of pervasive privatization. Revista De Educacion 395, pp. 113-133.
  18. Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (In press). Digital Umgang and the loss of a common world. Approaching post-truth from an ecological and educational perspective. Philosophy of Education, 80(3).
  19. Wagenschein, M. (1956). ‘Zum Begriff des exemplarischen Lehrens’ Internet resource (accessed 08.09.2016).
  20. Zajda, J., Majhanovich, S., & Rust, V. (2006). Introduction: Education and Social Justice. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale de l’Education, 52(1/2), pp. 9-22.