In this paper, we will explore a possible dialogue between educational pragmatism and post-critical pedagogy (PCP) and we will ‘test’ it in reference to the question of inclusion, which is arguably one of the chief notions in contemporary educational debate. To start with, we will object to the possibly unfortunate adoption of the “normativity” vocabulary within the Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy and we will suggest the need for a shift from the language of norms to that of values, by building on Hans Joas’ distinction between norms and values. While norms have to do with obligation and the limitation of possibilities of action, values are characterized by an ideal and inspirational function. In keeping with Joas’ distinction, we will argue that the notion of normativity may risk being accomplice with the excessive role of normative critique decried by postcritical approaches. Against this backdrop, we will zoom in on the question of inclusion. We will indicate two possible outlooks: a critical pragmatist view of inclusion, as exemplified in some insights of José Medina, and a post-critical understanding, which we will outline in reference to Joas but also ‒ via him ‒ to the classics of educational pragmatism. We will finally suggest that the relationships between critique and post-critique should be construed in terms of a quasi-Bohrian complementarity and that pragmatism qua a “corridor theory,” as Papini famously put it, can help us to orchestrate this complex regime of relationships.
References
Addams, J. (2002). Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Arendt, H. (2006). Crisis in education. In H. Arendt, Between Past and Future. London: Penguin books.
Benner, D. (2015). Allgemeine Pädagogik. Eine systematischproblemgeschichtliche Einführung in die Grundstruktur pädagogischen Denkens und Handelns. Weinheim und München: BELTZ Juventa.
Cremin, L.A. (1961). The Transformation of the School. Progressivism in American Education 1876-1957. New York: Vintage Books.
Dewey, J. (1984). The Sources of a Science of Education. In J.A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey: vol. 5: 1929-1930 (pp. 1-40). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1986). A Common Faith. In J.A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey: vol. 9: 1933-1934 (pp. 1-58). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Fendler, L. (2018). Educationalization. In P. Smeyers (ed.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 1169-1184). Cham: Springer.
Heinich, N. (2017). Des valeurs. Un approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.
Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2017). Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy. Santa Barbara (CA): punctum books.
James, W. (1982) The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Penguin Classics.
Joas, H. (2000). The Genesis of Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (2008). The Cultural Values of Europe: An Introduction. In H. Joas & K. Wiegandt (eds.), The Cultural Values of Europe (pp. 1-21). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Labaree, D.F. (2008). The Winning Ways of a Losing Strategy: Educationalizing Social Problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), pp. 447-460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00299.x.
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In Defense of the School. A Public Issue. Leuven: Education, Culture & Society Publishers.
Medina, J. (2014). Towards An Ethics and Pedagogy of Discomfort: Insensitivity, Perplexity, and Education as Inclusion. Civitas Educationis. Education, Politics and Culture, 3(1), pp. 51-67.
Oliverio, S. (2018). The Philosophical and Educational Big Bang. An Aristophanic-Deweyan Archaeology. In N. Levinson (ed.), Philosophy of Education Society Yearbook 2016 (pp. 362-371). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Oliverio, S. (2019). An Edifying Philosophy of Education? Starting a Conversation between Rorty and Post-critical Pedagogy. Ethics & Education, 14(4), pp. 482-496. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669311.
Oliverio, S. (2020). The Question of a Thing-Centred View of Education: Notes on Vlieghe and Zamojski’s Towards an Ontology of Teaching. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(1), pp. 103-107. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-019-09693-w.
Oliverio, S., & Thoilliez, B. (2024). Post-Critical Pedagogy: A Philosophical and Epistemological Identikit. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 58(6), pp. 1029-1045. DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhae076.
Papini, G. (1961). Pragmatismo. In G. Papini, Filosofia e letteratura (pp. 329-468). Milano: Arnaldo Mondadori Editore.
Santarelli, M. (2024). Improving Concepts, Reshaping Values: Pragmatism and Ameliorative Projects. Inquiry, 67(3), pp. 872-890. DOI:
1080/0020174X.2022.2095300.
Seigfried, C.H. (2002). Introduction. In J. Addams, Democracy and Social Ethics (pp. ix-xxxviii). Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Serrano Zamora, J., & Santarelli, M. (2021). Populism or Pragmatism? Two Ways of Understanding Political Articulation. Constellations, 28(4), pp. 496-510. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12522.
Smeyers, P, & Depaepe, M. (eds.) (2008). Educational Research: The Educationalization of Social Problems. Cham: Springer.
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophical Papers, vol. 1: Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thoilliez, B. (2019). Hope and Education beyond Critique. Towards Pedagogy with a Lower Case ‘p’. Ethics & Education, 14(4), pp. 453-466. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669379.
Viola, T. (2019). From Vague Symbols to Contested Concepts: Peirce, W.B. Gallie, and History. History and Theory, 58(2), pp. 233-251. DOI: 10.1111/hith.12111.
Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2019). Towards an Ontology of Teaching: Thingcentred Pedagogy, Affirmation and Love for the World. Cham: Springer.
Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2020). Redefining Education and Politics: On the Paradoxical Relation between Two Separate Spheres. Policy Futures in Education, 18(7), pp. 864-877. DOI: 10.1177/1478210320943808.
Wortmann, K. (2019). ‘Post-critical Pedagogy as Poetic Practice: Combining Affirmative and Critical Vocabularies’. Ethics and Education, 14(4), pp. 467-81. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669942.