Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Regular Articles

Early View

Non-nutritive sweeteners: Factors influencing the choice of university students in Vietnam

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2025oa20762
Submitted
luglio 31, 2025
Published
2025-11-20

Abstract

This study explores the factors that influence Vietnamese university students’ food choices when it comes to products containing non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs). Drawing on consumer behavior theory and insights from focus group discussions, a conceptual model was developed with five independent variables – Health Perception, Acceptance, Product Properties, Beliefs, and Availability – and one dependent variable – Food Choice. A survey was then conducted both online and offline with 1,849 responses and further reduced to 936 valid responses after two rounds of data cleaning. Data from the survey were analyzed for reliability, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results confirmed a good model fit with strong convergent and discriminant validity. Three factors significantly influenced food choices were: Acceptance (β = 0.463), Health Perception (β = 0.235), and Availability (β = 0.141), with Acceptance being the most influential. These findings offer valuable insights for businesses and organizations aiming to promote NNS-containing products more effectively. Understanding the key drivers behind students’ food choices can help stakeholders tailor their products and communication strategies to better meet consumer needs and encourage healthier dietary habits.

References

  1. Adaba, G. B. (2025). Empirical analysis of social media influencers’ effect on consumer purchase intentions and behavior. Platforms, 3(3), 11. Doi: 10.3390/platforms3030011.
  2. Adis (2012). Melika Husić-Mehmedović Slavo Kukić Muris Čičić CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR.
  3. Alharthi, S. A. S., Alaisayi, K. H. A., Alalawi, L. Y. S., Alamri, R. O. S., Abu-Elfotuh, K., Alenazi, T. S., Amirthalingam, P., Albariqi, H. A. H., Mohammed, A.A., Alsubayti, N., Hamdan, A. M. E., & Kozman, M. R. (2023). The consumption pattern and perception of using artificial sweeteners among the public in Tabuk region, Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1166868. Doi: 10.3389/FPUBH.2023.1166868/BIBTEX.
  4. Apergi, K., Malisova, O., Vlassopoulos, A., Fidanoglou, P., Kandyliari, A., & Kapsokefalou, M. (2024). Investigating the Sociodemographic and Health Characteristics of Non-Sugar Sweeteners Consumption in Greek School-Aged Children: A Cross-Sectional Study. Children, 11(7), 813. Doi: 10.3390/CHILDREN11070813/S1.
  5. Arshad, S., Rehman, T., Saif, S., Rajoka, M. S. R., Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Hassoun, A., Cropotova, J., Trif, M., Younas, A., & Aadil, R. M. (2022). Replacement of refined sugar by natural sweeteners: focus on potential health benefits. Heliyon, 8(9). Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10711.
  6. Daher, M., Fahd, C., Nour, A. A., & Sacre, Y. (2022). Trends and amounts of consumption of low-calorie sweeteners: A cross-sectional study. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 48, 427-433. Doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.01.006.
  7. Dunford, E. K., Taillie, L. S., Miles, D. R., Eyles, H., Tolentino-Mayo, L., & Ng, S. W. (2018). Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in the Packaged Food Supply – An Assessment across 4 Countries. Nutrients, 10(2), 257. Doi: 10.3390/NU10020257.
  8. Fagundes Grilo, M., Smith Taillie, L., Zancheta Ricardo, C., Amaral Mais, L., Bortoletto Martins, A. P., & Duran, A. C. (2022). Prevalence of Low-Calorie Sweeteners and Related Front-of-Package Claims in the Brazilian Packaged Food Supply. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 122(7), 1296-1304. Doi: 10.1016/J.JAND.2021.12.009.
  9. Farhat, G., Dewison, F., & Stevenson, L. (2021). Knowledge and Perceptions of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Within the UK Adult Population. Nutrients, 13(2), 444. Doi: 10.3390/NU13020444.
  10. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior IcekAjzen (n.d.).
  11. Guest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N., & McKenna, K. (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 693-708. Doi: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601.
  12. Gupta, M. (2018). Sugar Substitutes: Mechanism, Availability, Current Use and Safety Concerns-An Update. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(10), 1888. Doi. 10.3889/OAMJMS.2018.336.
  13. Hobbs, J. E. (2021). Consumer trust in food and the food system: A critical review. Foods, 10(10), 2490. Doi: 10.3390/foods10102490.
  14. Jaruga-Sękowska, S., Staśkiewicz, W., Woźniak-Holecka, J., Wanat-Kańtoch, G., Kardas, M., & Wójcicka, A. (2022). Consumer awareness and sweetener consumption habits of dietetics students. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 12(7), 750-759. Doi: 10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.07.073.
  15. Jurcevic Zidar, B., Knezovic, Z., Pribisalic, A., Luetic, S., Jurcic, K., Knezovic, N., & Sutlovic, D. (2025). Consumer Perceptions of Artificial Sweeteners in Food Products, Consumption Frequency, and Body Mass Index: A Multivariate Analysis. Nutrients, 17(5), 814. Doi: 10.3390/NU17050814/S1.
  16. Laja García, A. I., Samaniego-Vaesken, M. de L., Puga, A. M., Partearroyo, T., & Varela-Moreiras, G. (2022). Perception and knowledge of low- and no-calorie sweeteners in multidisciplinary stakeholders from Spain. Nutrition Bulletin, 47(4), 438-448. Doi: 10.1111/NBU.12583.
  17. Lee, A. A., & Owyang, C. (2017). Sugars, Sweet Taste Receptors, and Brain Responses. Nutrients, 9(7), 653. Doi: 10.3390/NU9070653.
  18. Lưu, T. T., Đinh, T. M. P., & Nguyễn, T. N. T. (2024). Nghiên cứu các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến ý định mua sản phẩm đạt chứng nhận OCOP của người tiêu dùng trên địa bàn thành phố Cần Thơ. CTU Journal of Science, 60(2). Doi: 10.22144/ctujos.2024.260.
  19. Naicker, S., Naicker, A., & Singh, E. (2024). Non-nutritive sweeteners: consumer awareness and inclusion in food and beverage products in South Africa. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 37(1), 30-37. Doi: 10.1080/16070658.2023.2220272;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER.
  20. Naveed, A., Khan, B., Asghar, K., Noor, M., Arshad, M., Sultan, T., & Mazhar, M. (2024). Assessment of Knowledge and Perceptions of Pakistani Adults about Nonnutritive Sweeteners. DIET FACTOR (Journal of Nutritional and Food Sciences), 32-39. Doi: 10.54393/DF.V5I01.104.
  21. Servant, G., Tachdjian, C., Tang, X. Q., Werner, S., Zhang, F., Li, X., Kamdar, P., Petrovic, G., Ditschun, T., Java, A., Brust, P., Brune, N., DuBois, G. E., Zoller, M., & Karanewsky, D. S. (2010). Positive allosteric modulators of the human sweet taste receptor enhance sweet taste. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(10), 4746-4751. Doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0911670107/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.200911670SI.PDF.
  22. Sugars intake for adults and children (n.d.).
  23. Sugary drinks, alcohol, and cigarettes to face higher taxes in Vietnam (n.d.). -- Retrieved July 31, 2025, from https://vietnamnet.vn/en/sugary-drinks-alcohol-andcigarettes-to-face-higher-taxes-in-vietnam-2411421.html.
  24. T Ha, H. T., Tran, L. D., N Nguyen, L. T., Chi Minh City, H., & Thi Thu Hoa, H. (n.d.). Consumer’s behavior towards organic food: A case study in Ho Chi Minh City. -- www.jad.hcmuaf.edu.vn.
  25. Tang, C. S., Mars, M., James, J., De Graaf, K., & Appleton, K. M. (2021). Sweet talk: A qualitative study exploring attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners and sweet-tasting foods in the united kingdom. Foods, 10(6), 1172. Doi: 10.3390/FOODS10061172.
  26. Wang, E. S. T., Lin, H. C., & Tsai, M. C. (2021). Effect of institutional trust on consumers’ health and safety perceptions and repurchase intention for traceable fresh food. Foods, 10(12). Doi: 10.3390/foods10122898.