Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Regular Articles

Early View

The implementation of EU Optional Quality Term “Mountain Products” in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the food sector in rural mountain areas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2025oa18773
Submitted
novembre 2, 2024
Published
2025-08-08

Abstract

The Optional Quality Term (OQT) “Mountain Product” aims to promote mountain food products. This term can be beneficial for the economy of mountain regions, as it allows them to distinguish their products and can protect consumers from fraud, counterfeiting or agro-piracy. This study has two main objectives: to assess how farms that have adopted the label perceive their limitations and to analyse the reasons for these limitations and provide policy recommendations to strengthen the use of OQT. The study involves a survey of agri-food companies that have adopted the label, with data collected through a questionnaire. Although existing research indicates that consumers generally prefer mountain products and perceive them as higher quality, producers report that consumer awareness of the OQT is still low. It appears essential to improve communication with both producers and consumers on the economic, social and environmental benefits of the ‘mountain product’ label. Producers need support to integrate the label into their business strategies, while consumers should be informed about the ethical and social responsibility linked to the OQT.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Akerlof, G. A. (1970); The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), August, 488-500. Doi: 10.2307/1879431.
  3. Bassi, I., Carzedda, M., Grassetti, L., Iseppi, L., & Nassivera, F. (2021). Consumer attitudes towards the mountain product label: Implications for mountain development. J. Mt. Sci., 18(9), 2255-2272. Doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6616-z.
  4. Bassi, I., Carzedda, M., Gori, E., & Iseppi L. (2022). Rasch analysis of consumer attitudes towards the mountain product label. Agricultural and Food Economics, 10, 13. Doi: 10.1186/s40100-022-00218-.
  5. Bentivoglio, D., Savini, S., Finco, A. et al. (2019a). Quality and origin of mountain food products: the new European label as a strategy for sustainable development. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(2). Doi: 10.1007/s11629-018-4962-x.
  6. Bentivoglio, D., Bucci, G., & Finco, A. (2019b). Farmers’ general image and attitudes to traditional mountain food labelled: a SWOT analysis. Quality-Access to Success, 20(S2).
  7. Bentivoglio, D., Bucci, G., & Staffolani, G. (2020). Valorizzazione del latte «Prodotto di montagna»: un’analisi esplorativa sulle scelte di acquisto dei consumatori. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 75(2), 77-88. Doi: 10.13128/rea-12071.
  8. Bonadonna, A., Duglio, S., Bollani, L., & Peira, G. (2022). Mountain Food Products: A Cluster Analysis Based on Young Consumers’ Perceptions. Sustainability, 14, 12511. Doi: 10.3390/su141912511.
  9. Bonadonna, A., Peira, G., & Varese, E. (2015). The European Optional Quality Term “Mountain Product”: Hypothetical Application in the Production Chain of a Traditional Dairy Product. Quality Access to Success, 16(144).
  10. Bonadonna, A. (2016). What Does the Optional Quality Term “Mountain Product” Involve? The Biellese Mountain (North West Italy) Farmers’ Opinions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1). Doi: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1p18.
  11. Bonadonna, A., Peira, G., Giachino, C., & Molinaro, L. (2017). Traditional Cheese Production and an EU Labeling Scheme: The Alpine Cheese Producers’ Opinion. Agriculture, 7, 65; doi: 10.3390/agriculture7080065.
  12. Bonadonna, A., Peira, G., & Brocardo, R. (a cura di) (2020). Il “Prodotto di montagna” in Piemonte. Indagine sull’utilizzo dell’indicazione facoltativa di qualità. Università degli Studi di Torino - Dipartimento di Management e Regione Piemonte - Direzione Agricoltura e cibo.
  13. Cagnina, M. R., Cosmina, M., Gallenti, G., Marangon, F., Nassivera, F., & Troiano, S. (2018). The role of information in consumers’ behavior: A survey on the counterfeit food products. Economia Agro-Alimentare, 20(2), 221-231.
  14. Canavari, M., Pignatti, E., Spadoni, R., & van Sprundel, G. (2010). Nuove dinamiche nel commercio dei prodotti agroalimentari: resistenze all’adozione dell’ecommerce nelle relazioni B2B. Economia agro-alimentare, 03. Doi: 10.3280/ECAG2009-003006.
  15. Casati, D. (2006). Il ruolo della specificità per la valorizzazione dei prodotti agroalimentari. Economia Agro-Alimentare, 01.
  16. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to conditions of use of the optional quality term ‘mountain product’.
  17. Decreto del Ministro delle politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali del 26 luglio 2017, n. 51167 recante disposizioni nazionali per l’attuazione del regolamento (UE) n. 1151/12 e del regolamento delegato (UE) n. 665/2014 sulle condizioni d’utilizzo dell’indicazione facoltativa di qualità “prodotto di montagna”.
  18. Decreto di modifica del decreto del Ministro delle politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali del 26 luglio 2017, n. 51167 recante disposizioni nazionali per l’attuazione del regolamento (UE) n. 1151/12 e del regolamento delegato (UE) n. 665/2014 sulle condizioni d’utilizzo dell’indicazione facoltativa di qualità “prodotto di montagna”.
  19. Decreto del Ministro delle politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali del 2 agosto 2018 sull’Istituzione del logo identificativo per l’indicazione facoltativa di qualità “prodotto di montagna” in attuazione del Decreto Ministeriale 26 luglio 2017 n. 57167.
  20. Decreto del Ministro delle politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali del 20 luglio 2018 che definisce le linee guida sulla verifica di quanto disposto dall’art. 2, comma 3 del decreto ministeriale n. 57167 del 26/07/2017 concernente disposizioni nazionali per l’attuazione del regolamento (UE) n. 1151/2012 e del regolamento delegato (UE) n. 665/2014 sulle condizioni di utilizzo dell’indicazione facoltativa di qualità “prodotto di montagna” in merito all’origine degli alimenti destinati all’alimentazione animale.
  21. EU CAP Network Focus Group (2024). Competitive and resilient mountain areas; Innovation & Knowledge Exchange | EIP-AGRI. -- https://eu-cap-network.ec.europa.eu/publications/eu-cap-network-focus-group-competitive-and-resilientmountain-areas_en#section--resources.
  22. Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
  23. EU REGULATION No 1151/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
  24. Euromontana (2016). Carta Europea dei Prodotti Agroalimentari di Qualità della Montagna, versione 2016. Bruxelles (Belgium).
  25. Euromontana (2020). Implementation of the EU Optional Quality Term “mountain product”. Where do we stand in the different Member States? Bruxelles (Belgium).
  26. Fernández-Barcala, M., González-Díaz, M., & Raynaud E. (2016). Contrasting the governance of supply chains with and without geographical indications: complementarity between levels. Supply Chain Management, 22(4), 305-320. Doi: 10.1108/SCM-05-2016-0161.
  27. Gupta, H., Nishi, M., & Gasparatos, A. (2021). Community based responses for tackling environmental and socioeconomic change and impacts in mountain social-ecological systems. Ambio, 51, 1123-1142. Doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01651-6.
  28. Ingty, T. (2017). High Mountain communities and climate change adaptation, traditional ecological knowledge, and institutions. Clim. Chang., 145, 41-55. Doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-2080-3.
  29. Martins, N., & Ferreira C.F.R., I. (2017). Mountain food products: A broad spectrum of market potential to be exploited. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 67, 12-18.
  30. Mazzocchi, C., & Sali, G. (2021a). Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 701-723. Doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01464-3.
  31. Mazzocchi, C., Orsi, L., & Sali, G. (2021b). Consumers’ Attitudes for Sustainable Mountain Cheese. Sustainability, 13, 1743. Doi: 10.3390/su13041743.
  32. McMorran, R., Santini, F., Guri, F., Gomez y Paloma, S., Martin, P., Olivier Beucherie, O., Monticelli, C., Rouby, A., Delphine Vitrolles, D., & Cloye, G. (2015). A mountain food label for Europe?. Journal of Alpine Research. Doi: 10.4000/rga.2654.
  33. Messer, K. D., Kaiser, H. M., & Schulze, W. D. (2008). The problem of free riding in voluntary generic advertising: Parallelism and possible solutions from the lab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2), 540-552. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01114.x.
  34. Menozzi, D., Yeh, C.-H., Cozzi, E., & Arfini, F. (2022). Consumer Preferences for Cheese Products with Quality Labels: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté. Animals, 12, 1299. Doi: 10.3390/ani12101299.
  35. Moretti, M., Belliggiano, A., Grando, S., Felici, F., Scotti, I., Ievoli, C., Blackstock, K., Delgado-Serrano, M. M., & Brunori, G. (2023). Characterizing value chains’ contribution to resilient and sustainable development in European mountain areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 100, 103022. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103022.
  36. Oostindië, H., van der Ploeg, J. D., Broekhuizen, R. V., Ventura, F., & Milone, P. (2010). The central role of nested markets in rural development in Europe. Riv. Econ. Agrar., 65, 191-224.
  37. Scaglioni, G., & Rogazan, C. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of the EU optional quality term “mountain product” - Final report; Mountain Valorisation Through Interconnectedness and Green Growth. -- www.moving-h2020.eu.
  38. Schneiderbauer, S., Fontanella Pisa, P., Delves, J. L., Pedoth, L., Rufat, S., Erschbame, M., Thaler, T., Carnelli, F., & Granados-Chahin, S. (2021). Risk perception of climate change and natural hazards in global mountain regions: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ., 784, 146957. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146957.
  39. Scotti, I., Ievoli, C., Bindi, L., Bispini, S., & Belliggiano, A. (2023). FacingClimate Vulnerability in Mountain Areas: The Role of Rural Actors’ Agency and Situated Knowledge Production. Sustainability, 15, 15877. Doi: 10.3390/su152215877.
  40. Staffolani, G., Bentivoglio, D., & Finco, A. (2022). Consumers’ Purchasing Determinants Towards Mountain Food Products. Sustainability, 14, 8282. Doi: 10.3390/su14148282.
  41. Stiletto, A., & Trestini, S. (2023). When less isn’t more and more isn’t less: is there an overlap between “protected designation of origin”, “mountain product” and “organic” in Italy?. British Food Journal, 12(13), 45-60. Doi: 10.1108/BFJ 022022 0107.
  42. Stotten, R., Ambrosi, L., Tasser, E., & Leitinger, G. (2021). Social-ecological resilience in remote mountain communities: Toward a novel framework for an interdisciplinary investigation. Ecol. Soc., 26, 29. Doi: 10.5751/ES-12580-260329.
  43. Tebby, C., Giraud, G., & Amblard, C. (2010). Determinants of interest in mountain food products: A European cross country study, 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4-7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria).
  44. Yee, T. W. (2010). The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 32, 1-34.
  45. Wyss, R., Luthe, T., Pedoth, L., Schneiderbauer, S., Adler, C., Apple, M., Acosta, E.E., Fitzpatrick, H., Haider, J., Ikizer, G. et al. (2022). Mountain resilience: A systematic literature review and paths to the future. Mt. Res. Dev., 42, A23-A36; doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00044.1.
  46. Zanchini, R., Di Vita, G., Panzone, L., & Brun, F. (2023). What Is the Value of a “Mountain Product” Claim? A Ranking Conjoint Experiment on Goat’s Milk Yoghurt. Foods, 12, 2059. Doi: 10.3390/foods12102059.
  47. Zuliani, A., Esbjerg, L., Grunert, K. G., & Bovolenta, S. (2018). Animal Welfare and Mountain Products from Traditional Dairy Farms: How Do Consumers Perceive Complexity?. Animals, 8, 207; doi: 10.3390/ani8110207.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...