Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Special Issue 31st Annual Conference of the Società Italiana di Economia Agro-alimentare (SIEA – Italian Association of Agri-Food Economics), Venice (Italy), June 15-16, 2023

Early View

The transition of food systems towards sustainability: The role of digitalization

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2024oa17771
Submitted
aprile 30, 2024
Published
2024-12-18

Abstract

The paper explores the complex relationship between digital and ecological transitions, particularly focusing on their interdependence and potential to drive sustainability. It acknowledges that digitalization, while offering numerous benefits such as efficiency and scalability, does not inherently lead to sustainability. The text highlights three critical aspects influencing digitalization’s impact: the design of digital solutions, access to these solutions, and the complexity of systems integrating digital technologies. Challenges such as the risk of exacerbating inequalities and the necessity for comprehensive governance to mitigate negative effects are discussed. The paper also delves into the digital transition within the agri-food sector, emphasizing the contrast between conventional agriculture and agroecological approaches, which prioritize diversity and resilience. It argues that digital tools can support more sustainable and diverse agricultural practices if correctly aligned with ecological principles. Finally, the text calls for targeted innovation policies to ensure that digital transition contributes effectively to ecological goals, suggesting that a thoughtful and directed approach is essential for realizing the transformative potential of digitalization in fostering a sustainable future.

References

  1. Alur, R. (2015). Principles of cyber-physical systems. MIT press.
  2. Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Kemp, R., & Haxeltine, A. (2017). Game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecology and Society, 22(4). doi: 10.5751/ES-09897-220441.
  3. Barykin, S. Y., Kapustina, I. V., Kirillova, T. V., Yadykin, V. K., & Konnikov, Y. A. (2020). Economics of digital ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 124. doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040124.
  4. Bellon-Maurel, V., Lutton, E., Bisquert, P., Brossard, L., Chambaron-Ginhac, S., Labarthe, P., … & Veissier, I. (2022). Digital revolution for the agroecological transition of food systems: A responsible research and innovation perspective. Agricultural Systems, 203, 103524. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103524.
  5. Berbel, J., & Mateos, L. (2014). Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model. Agricultural Systems, 128, 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.04.003.
  6. Brunori, G. (2022). Agriculture and rural areas facing the “twin transition”: principles for a sustainable rural digitalisation. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 3-14.
  7. Buhalis, D., Harwood, T., Bogicevic, V., Viglia, G., Beldona, S., & Hofacker, C. (2019). Technological disruptions in services: lessons from tourism and hospitality. Journal of Service Management, 30(4), 484-506. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-12-2018-0398.
  8. Büyüközkan, G., & Uztürk, D. (2024). Integrated design framework for smart agriculture: Bridging the gap between digitalization and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141572. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.141572.
  9. Carolan, M. (2018). ‘Smart’ farming techniques as political ontology: access, sovereignty and the performance of neoliberal and not‐so‐neoliberal worlds. Sociologia ruralis, 58(4), 745-764. doi: 10.1111/soru.12216.
  10. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
  11. Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2). doi: 10.1177/2053951716665128.
  12. Estagnasié, C., Bonneau, C., Vasquez, C., & Vayre, É. (2022). (Re) creating the Inhabited Workspace: Rematerialization Practices of Remote Work. Digitalization of Work: New Spaces and New Working Times, 5, 129-154.
  13. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford.
  14. Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681-696. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.
  15. Geels, F., Turnheim, B., Asquith, M., Kern, F., & Kivimaa, P. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. Doctoral dissertation, European Environment Agency.
  16. Ingram, J. (2018). Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 117-135. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002.
  17. Kerber, W., & Schweitzer, H. (2017). Interoperability in the digital economy. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 8, 39.
  18. Kiers, E. T., Leakey, R. R., Izac, A. M., Heinemann, J. A., Rosenthal, E., Nathan, D., & Jiggins, J. (2008). Agriculture at a crossroads. Science, 320(5874), 320-321. doi: 10.1126/science.1158390.
  19. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. May, T., and Perry, B. (2017). Reflexivity: The Essential Guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  21. Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Soundings, 49(49), 131-142. doi: 10.3898/136266211798411183.
  22. Misra, S., & Ghosh, A. (2024). Agriculture paradigm shift: a journey from traditional to modern agriculture. In: Biodiversity and Bioeconomy (pp. 113-141). Elsevier.
  23. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea green publishing.
  24. Molas-Gallart, J., Boni, A., Giachi, S., & Schot, J. (2021). A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies. Research Evaluation, 30(4), 431-442. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvaa034.
  25. Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024). The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 44(2), 1-21. doi: 10.1007/s13593-023-0085-z.
  26. Muminov, A., Na, D., Lee, C., Kang, H. K., & Jeon, H. S. (2019). Modern virtual fencing application: Monitoring and controlling behavior of goats using GPS collars and warning signals. Sensors, 19(7), 1598. doi: 10.3390/s19071598.
  27. Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Rotolo, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Taking AI risks seriously: a new assessment model for the AI Act. AI & SOCIETY. doi 10.1007/s00146-022-01622-x.
  28. Novy, A., Barlow, N., & Fankhauser, J. (2022). Transformative innovation. In: Handbook of critical environmental politics (pp. 593-610). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  29. Olsson, P., & Galaz, V. (2012). Social-ecological innovation and transformation. In: Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 223-247). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230367098_12.
  30. Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 27-50. doi: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch2.
  31. Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company.
  32. Purcell, W., & Neubauer, T. (2023). Digital Twins in Agriculture: A State-ofthe-art review. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3, 100094. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2023.100094.
  33. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., … & Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A sociocyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.019.
  34. Rolandi, S., Brunori, G., Bacco, M., & Scotti, I. (2021). The digitalization of agriculture and rural areas: Towards a taxonomy of the impacts. Sustainability, 13(9), 5172. doi: 10.3390/su13095172.
  35. Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
  36. Webb, P., Benton, T. G., Beddington, J., Flynn, D., Kelly, N. M., & Thomas, S. M. (2020). The urgency of food system transformation is now irrefutable. Nature Food, 1(10), 584-585. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00181-y.
  37. Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503-515. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009004.
  38. Zscheischler, J., Brunsch, R., Rogga, S., & Scholz, R. W. (2022). Perceived risks and vulnerabilities of employing digitalization and digital data in agriculture – Socially robust orientations from a transdisciplinary process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132034. doi: 10.1016/j jclepro.2022.132034.
  39. Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...