Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Regular Articles

Early View

Unearthing Unique Value: Exploring the Potential of Protected Designation of Origin on the Tangerine Industry of Patate, Tungurahua

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2024oa16120
Submitted
June 28, 2023
Published
2024-05-02

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential of the Tangerine of Patate (Citrus x clementina) to obtain a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO). The study emphasizes the crucial role of local climatic conditions, unique soil characteristics, and traditional cultivation techniques in determining the fruit’s organoleptic properties. The methodology consists of applying two stages of the virtuous circle proposed by Vandecandelaere: (1) Identification and (2) Proposal of Qualification. Information on cultural practices and post-harvest techniques was gathered through surveys. Qualitative data from surveys were processed using the MAXQDA software. Tangerine and other samples were analyzed with normalized physicochemical analyses in the lab. The first data were compared with samples from two different cantons to validate the intrinsic value of Patate’s tangerine. Results demonstrate that the tangerine exhibits differentiated characteristics in terms of aroma, color, and flavor, as well as a traditional inherited practice that is part of the attributes supporting its potential DO status. It is concluded that the mandarin meets the requirements to obtain a Protected Designation of Origin based on specific conditions of production and harvest, as well as is a potential economic aspect to consider increasing farmers’ incomes.

References

  1. Alvarado, J.D.D. (1996). Principios de Ingeniería Aplicados a Alimentos. Radio Comunicaciones. -- www.researchgate.net/publication/302119863_Principios_de_Ingenieria_Aplicados_en_Alimentos_2da_ed.
  2. Arias Velázquez, C.J., & Toledo Hevia, J. (2007). Manual de manejo postcosecha de frutas Tropicales (Papaya, piña, plátano, cítricos). Organización de Las Naciones Unidas Para La Agricultura y La Alimentación (FAO), 1, 50.
  3. Ballantyne, D., Terblanche, N.S., Lecat, B. & Chapuis C. (2019). Old world and new world wine concepts of terroir and wine: perspectives of three renowned non-French winemakers, Journal of Wine Research. Doi: 10.1080/09571264.2019.1602031.
  4. Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127-138. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9.
  5. Belletti, G. (1999). Origin labeled products, reputation, and heterogeneity of firms. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE). Doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.241035.
  6. Belletti, G., Burgassi, T., Manco, E., Marescotti, A., Pacciani, A., & Scaramuzzi, S. (2007). “The roles of geographical indications (DO and PGI) on the internationalization process of agro-food products”, 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7851, European Association of Agricultural Economists. Doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.7851.
  7. Benedetto, A. (2007). Valorización de la identidad territorial, políticas públicas y estrategias de desarrollo territorial en los países del MERCOSUR. Revista Opera, 7, 139-165. -- https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4020389.
  8. Bernal, C. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación (3ra, Issue c). Pearson Educación.
  9. Bonfante, A., Basile, A., Langella, G., Manna, P., & Terribile, F. (2011). A physically oriented approach to analysis and mapping of terroirs, Geoderma, 167-168, 103-117. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.08.004.
  10. Bowen, S., & Zapata, A.V. (2009). Geographical indications, terroir, and socioeconomic and ecological sustainability: The case of tequila. Journal of Rural Studies, 25(1), 108-119. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.07.003.
  11. Bramley, C., Biénabe, E., & Kirsten, J. (2009). The economics of geographical indications: towards a conceptual framework for geographical indication research in developing countries. The economics of intellectual property, 1, 109-149.
  12. Comisión del Codex Alimentarius. Norma de la CEPE para los Frutos Cítricos FFV-14, (1998). -- http://docplayer.es/141502362-Comision-del-codex-alimentarius.html.
  13. Correa, M., & Granda, J. (2013). Aplicación y sistematización de la propuesta metodológica para el análisis de vulnerabilidades de la parroquia urbana Patate, cantón Patate, mediante el uso de herramientas SIG. Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas. -- http://repositorio.espe.edu.ec/handle/21000/6879.
  14. ESPAC (2017). Encuesta de Superficie y Producción Agropecuaria Continua.
  15. Fabroni, S., Romeo, F.V., & Rapisarda, P. (2016). Nutritional Composition of Clementine (Citrus x clementina) Cultivars. Nutritional Composition of Fruit Cultivars (pp. 149-172). Elsevier. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-408117-8.00007-6.
  16. FAO (1999). Codex Alimentarius. Norma de la CEPE para Frutos Cítricos. In Comisión del Codex Alimentarius.
  17. FAO (2016). Citrus Fruit is fresh and processed. In: Ccp.Ci/St/2016, FAO. -- www.fao.org/3/a-i8092e.pdf.
  18. Gracia, A. (2014). Consumers’ preferences for a local food product: a real choice experiment. Empirical Economics, 47(1), 111-128. Doi: 10.1007/s00181-013-0738-x.
  19. Granados, L. (2004). Indicaciones geográficas y denominaciones de origen. Un aporte para su implementación en Costa Rica (p. 160). IICA, PRODAR, MAG, CNP. -- www.cadenagro.org/images/Descargas/articulosleonardo/ig%20y%20doun%20aporte%20para%20su%20implementacion%20en%20costa%20rica-iicaprodar-lgranados2004.pdf.
  20. Grijalva, J.N., Viera, D.N., & Villacís, D.M. (2020). Designations of origin and geographical indications as an element of economic development: The Ecuador Case. RFJ, 8, 165. Doi: 10.26807/rfj.v2i8.236.
  21. Grunert, K.G. (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of agricultural economics, 32(3), 369-391. Doi: 10.1093/eurrag/jbi011.
  22. Jones, G.V., White, M.A., Cooper, O.R., & Storchmann, K. (2005a). Climate Change and Global Wine Quality. Climatic Change, 73, 319-343 -- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2.
  23. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
  24. Lavín, J.M., Martínez-Bonilla, C., Medina-Guerra, F.N., & Viteri-Torres, W.F. (2017). Diferencias entre el perfil del turista cultural y el turista religioso. La festividad del Señor del Terremoto en Patate (Ecuador). Methodos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 5(1), 142-154. Doi: 10.17502/m.rcs.v5i1.159.
  25. López, J.D.J.H. (2018). El mezcal como patrimonio social: de indicaciones geográficas genéricas a denominaciones de origen regionales. Em Questão, 404-433.
  26. Lou, B., Fu, X., & Xue, B. (2023). Effectiveness, Problems, and Transformation of Geographical Indications in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Evidence from Pengshui in Chongqing. Sustainability, 15(11), 8870. Doi: 10.3390/su15118870.
  27. Mancini, M.C., & Arfini, F. (2018). Short supply chains and protected designations of origin: The case of Parmigiano Reggiano (Italy). Ager: Revista de estudios sobre despoblación y desarrollo rural= Journal of depopulation and rural development studies, (25), 43-64. -- https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6632123.
  28. Millán Vázquez De La Torre, M. G., Amador, L., & Arjona Fuentes, J.M. (2016). La denominación de origen protegida “Los Pedroches” como ruta gastronómica del jamón ibérico: Análisis del perfil del visitante y evolución futura. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 13(77), 63-91. Doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.cdr13-77.dopp.
  29. Moreno-Miranda, C., Jordán, J., Moreno, R., Moreno, P., Solis, J. (2019). Designation of Origin and Sustainability Characterization: The Case of DO Cocoa Arriba. Agriculture, 9, 229. Doi: 10.3390/agriculture9100229.
  30. NMX-F-428 (1982). Alimentos. Determinación de humedad (Método rápido de la termobalanza).
  31. NTE-INEN-1930 (1992). Frutas Frescas. Mandarina. Requisitos. -- www.normalizacion.gob.ec/buzon/normas/nte_inen_1930-1.pdf.
  32. PACT (2012). Estudio Definitivo Puñapi. -- https://rrnn.tungurahua.gob.ec/documentos/ver/5245efd0bd92eab007000002.
  33. Quintana, M.D., & Aguilar, J. (2018). Denominación de origen de cacao ecuatoriano: ¿un aporte de marketing global?. INNOVA Research Journal, 3(10), 68-76. Doi: 10.33890/innova.v3.n10.1.2018.825.
  34. Ramirez, M., Silva, K., Belmont, P., & Freire, W. (2017). Tabla de composición de alimentos del Ecuador: Compilación del Equipo técnico de la ENSANUTECU. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. -- www.researchgate.net/publication/272026302_Tabla_de_composicion_de_alimentos_del_Ecuador_Compilacion_del_Equipo_tecnico_de_la_ENSANUT-ECU.
  35. Rangnekar, D. (2004). The socioeconomics of geographical indications. UNCTADICTSD project on IPRs and sustainable development. -- https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ictsd2004ipd8_en.pdf.
  36. Rodríguez Gómez, G. (2007). La denominación de origen del tequila: pugnas de poder y la construcción de la especificidad sociocultural del agave azul. Nueva antropología, 20(67), 141-171.
  37. Skuras, D., & Vakrou, A. (2002). Consumers’ willingness to pay for origin labeled wine: A Greek case study. British Food Journal, 104(11), 898-912. Doi: 10.1108/00070700210454622.
  38. Sforzi, F., & Mancini, M.C. (2015). A Reinterpretation of the Agri-Food System and its Spatial Dynamics through the Industrial District. Local Agri-food Systems in a Global World: Market, Social and Environmental Challenges (pp. 9-27). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Doi: 10.5848/csp.3696.00001.
  39. Teuber, R. (2011). Geographical indications of origin as a tool of product differentiation: The case of coffee. Journal of international food & agribusiness marketing, 23(3-4), 214-226. -- http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21929.
  40. Tsakiridou, E., Mattas, K., Tsakiridou, H., & Tsiamparli, E. (2011). Purchasing fresh produce on the basis of food safety, origin, and traceability labels. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 17(2-3), 211-226. Doi: 10.1080/10454446.2011.548749.
  41. Van Leeuwen, C., & Seguin, G. (2006). The concept of terroir in viticulture. Journal of Wine Research, 17(1), 1-10. Doi: 10.1080/09571260600633135.
  42. van Leeuwen, C., Roby, J.-P., & de Rességuier, L. (2018). Soil-related terroir factors: a review. OENO One, 52(2), 173-188. Doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.2.2208.
  43. van Leeuwen, C., Barbe, J.-C., Darriet, P., Geffroy, O., Gomès, E., Guillaumie, S., Thibon, C. (2020). Recent advancements in understanding the terroir effect on aromas in grapes and wines: This article is published in cooperation with the XIIIth International Terroir Congress November 17-18 2020, Adelaide, Australia. Guest editors: Cassandra Collins and Roberta De Bei. OENO One, 54(4), 985-1006. Doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3983.
  44. Vandecandelaere, E., Arfini, F., Belletti, G., & Marescotti, A. (2010). Uniendo personas, territorios y productos. FAO. -- www.fao.org/3/i1760s/i1760s.pdf.
  45. Villalba, L., Herrera, A.O., & Orduz, J.O. (2017). Parámetros de calidad en la etapa de desarrollo y maduración en frutos de dos variedades y un cultivar de mandarina (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Orinoquia, 18(1), 21. Doi: 10.22579/20112629.277.
  46. WIPO (2017). Geographical Indications: An Introduction. World Intellectual Property Organization. -- www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4562.
  47. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2023). Geographical Indications: What DO they specify? WIPO -- www.wipo.int/geo_indications/en/.
  48. Zagorin (2019). Agricultural Cooperative of Zagora – Pelion: Apple of Zagora. -- https://zagorin.gr/en/timeline/.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...