Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Bioeconomics and its Derivations: Ecological Economics and Political Ecology

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023)

Application of Participatory Methods to Explore Changes in Land Use of a Tropical Dry Forest Basin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2023oa14572
Submitted
settembre 9, 2022
Published
2023-05-05

Abstract

Tropical hydrographic basins have undergone significant land use change processes in recent decades and correspond to areas of high population growth and development of economic activities. This article explores the causes of land use change in a tropical dry forest watershed, taking the Canalete river basin as a case study. For this purpose, stakeholder analysis techniques and participatory methods were applied. The results showed that the main causes of land use change in pastures were associated with biophysical factors, while forestsshrubs and crops were associated with direct and subyacents socioeconomics factors respectively. The participatory mapping allowed obtaining a desired land use scenario for the year 2030, observing a decrease of more than 16.2 ha of pasture, compensated by an increase of almost 2.4 thousand ha of crops and 13.8 thousand ha of forests and shrubs. Similarly, the hydrological impact of changes in land use was observed, especially in terms of flooding.

References

  1. Addo-Fordjour, P., & Ankomah, F. (2017). Patterns and drivers of forest land cover changes in tropical semi-deciduous forests in Ghana. Journal of Land Use Science, 12(1), 71-86. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2016.1241313.
  2. Aranda Echavarría, D., & Vidal González, D. (2020). La participación ciudadana en la formulación del Plan de Ordenamiento y Manejo de Cuencas Hidrográficas – POMCA –: La Experiencia del POMCA de los ríos Lili-Meléndez- Cañaveralejo. Universidad del Valle.
  3. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (2012). Evaluación Sectorial y Temática El reto del Manejo Integrado de cuencas hidrográficas.
  4. Barragan, W. (2013). Sistemas silvopastoriles para mejorar la producción de leche y disminuir el estrés calórico en la región Caribe Colombiana. Universidad de Antioquia.
  5. Beskow, S. (2009). Lash Model: A hidrological simulation tool in GIS framework. Universidade Federal de Lavras.
  6. Bolaños-Valencia, I., Villegas-Palacio, C., López-Gómez, C.P., Berrouet, L., & Ruiz, A. (2019). Social perception of risk in socio-ecological systems. A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Ecosystem Services, 38(65), 100942. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100942.
  7. Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2018). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization?. Applied Geography, 95(December 2017), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002.
  8. Brugha, R. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239-246. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.239.
  9. Castillo, O. (2007). Estacionalidad, ciclos y volatilidad en los precios del ganado macho de levante en Montería, Colombia. REvista MCZ Córdoba, 12(1), 897-911.
  10. Chantre, E., Guichard, L., Ballot, R., Jacquet, F., Jeuffroy, M.-H., Prigent, C., & Barzman, M. (2016). Co-click’eau, a participatory method for land-use scenarios in water catchments. Land Use Policy, 59, 260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.001.
  11. Chevalier, J.M., & Buckles, D.J. (2008). SAS2: A Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement. In Sage Publications. doi: 10.1080/09614520903220891.
  12. CONIF, OIMT, & Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (1998). Guía para plantaciones forestales comerciales. Córdoba.
  13. Cornelissen, T., Diekkrüger, B., & Giertz, S. (2013). A comparison of hydrological models for assessing the impact of land use and climate change on discharge in a tropical catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 498, 221-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.016.
  14. Corporación Autónoma de los Valles del Sinú y San Jorge – CVS (2020). Actualización del Plan de Ordenación y Manejo de la Cuenca Hidrográfica del río Canalete, Los Córdobas y otros arroyos localizada en los departamentos de Antioquia y Córdoba.
  15. Coxhead, I., & Shively, G. (2005). Land Use Change in Tropical Watershed: evidencie, causes and remedies. CAB International.
  16. CVS, Consorcio Ambiental, & Fondo de Adaptación (2017). Mapa de cobertura Metodología Corine Land Cover. Rio Canalete, río Los Córdobas u otros arroyos.
  17. CVS, & FONADE (2005). Diagnóstico Ambiental de la Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Canalete.
  18. CVS, & Universidad Pontifica Bolivariana (2008). Plan de ordenamiento y manejo integral de la cuenca hidrográfica del río Canalete.
  19. DANE (Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística) (2018). Boletín técnico: Mercado laboral por departamentos 2017. DANE. -- Online at: www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/ech/ml_depto/Boletin_dep_17.pdf (accessed July 2018). -- www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/ech/ml_depto/Boletin_dep_17.pdf.
  20. DeFries, R., & Eshleman, K.N. (2004). Land-use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future. Hydrological Processes, 18(AUGUST), 2183-2186. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5584.
  21. Demissie, F., Yeshitila, K., Kindu, M., & Schneider, T. (2017). Land use/Land cover changes and their causes in Libokemkem District of South Gonder, Ethiopia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 8(April), 224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2017.10.001.
  22. Dirzo, R., Young, H.S., Mooney, H.a., & Ceballos, G. (2011). Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests - Ecology and Conservation. Island Press.
  23. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2016). State of the World’s Forests. Forest and agricultural: Land-use challenges and oportunities (45(12)). FAO. -- Online at www.fao.org/3/a-i5588e.pdf (accessed July 2018).
  24. Farrick, K.K. (2014). Runoff Generation In A Tropical Dry Forest Watershed: Processes, Patterns And Connectivity. December.
  25. Finagro (2014). Infraestructura Regional Y Pobreza Rural.
  26. Friedman, A.L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  27. Garcia, L. (1998). Manejo integrado de los recursos hídricos en América Latina y el Caribe. -- http://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/4823.
  28. Garcia, L. (2018). Modelo de gestión de usos del suelo para la regulación hídrica en cuencas tropicales.
  29. Garcia, L., Avila, H., & Gutierrez, R.R. (2019). Land-use and socioeconomic changes related to armed conflicts: A Colombian regional case study. Environmental Science and Policy, 97(May), 116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.012.
  30. Geilfus, F. (2008). 80 Tools for participatory development. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture-IICA.
  31. Geist, H.J., & Lambin, E.F. (2002). Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2.
  32. Guldan, S.J., Fernald, A.G., Ochoa, C.G., & Tidwell, V.C. (2013). Collaborative community hydrology research in Northern New Mexico. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 152(1), 49-54. -- http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lah&AN=20143131504&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1936-704X%5Cnemail:sguldan@nmsu.edu%5Cafernald@nmsu.edu.
  33. Gumindoga, W., Rientjes, T.H.M., Haile, A.T., & Dube, T. (2014). Predicting streamflow for land cover changes in the Upper Gilgel Abay River Basin, Ethiopia: A TOPMODEL based approach. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 76-78, 3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2014.11.012.
  34. Hettig, E., Lay, J., & Sipangule, K. (2016). Drivers of Households’ Land-Use Decisions: A Critical Review of Micro-Level Studies in Tropical Regions. Land, 5(4), 32. doi: 10.3390/land5040032.
  35. Hewitt, R., van Delden, H., & Escobar, F. (2014). Participatory land use modelling, pathways to an integrated approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 52, 149-165. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.019.
  36. Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R. S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., & Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 1-12. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009.
  37. IAvH Instituo de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (2014). El bosque seco tropical en Colombia (C. Pizano, & H. García (Eds.)). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  38. IDEAM (2010). Leyenda nacional de coberturas de la tierra. Metodología CORINE Land Cover Adaptada para Colombia. Escala 1:100.000.
  39. IGAC (2009). Estudio general de suelos y zonificación de Tierras. In Departamento de Córdoba.
  40. Johansson, E.L., & Isgren, E. (2017). Local perceptions of land-use change: Using participatory art to reveal direct and indirect socioenvironmental effects of land acquisitions in Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 22(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-08986-220103.
  41. Julio, V., Martínez, B., Adolfo, G., & Parra, C. (2022). Factors influencing the use of non-timber forest products in cattle production under humid tropical conditions. Economia Agro-Alimentare/Food Economy, 24, 1-15. doi: 10.3280/ecag2022oa12566.
  42. Kalácska, M., Calvo-Alvarado, J.C., & Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.a. (2005). Calibration and assessment of seasonal changes in leaf area index of a tropical dry forest in different stages of succession. Tree Physiology, 25(6), 733-744. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.6.733.
  43. Kalra, N., Groves, D.G., Bonzanigo, L., Molina-perez, E., Ramos, C., Brandon, C., & Cabanillas, I.R. (2015). Robust Decision-Making in the Water Sector A Strategy for Implementing Lima’s Long-Term Water Resources Master Plan.
  44. Kissinger, G., Herold, M., & De Sy, V. (2012). Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation.
  45. Lambin, E.F., Geist, H.J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 205-241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459.
  46. Lambin, E.F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465-3472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100480108.
  47. Lambin, E.F., Meyfroidt, P., Rueda, X., Blackman, A., Börner, J., Cerutti, P.O., Dietsch, T., Jungmann, L., Lamarque, P., Lister, J., Walker, N.F., & Wunder, S. (2014). Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change, 28(1), 129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.007.
  48. Lovett, A., & Shutidamrong, F. (2008). ‘Riding an Elephant to Catch a Grasshopper’: Applying and Evaluating Techniques for Stakeholder Participation in Land-Use Planning within the Kae Watershed, Northern Thailand. In: A. Lovett, & K. Appleton (Eds.), GIS for environmental decision-making (pp. 149-164). Taylor & F.
  49. Mahecha, L. (2003). Importancia de los sistemas silvopastoriles y principales limitantes para su implementación en la ganadería colombiana. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 16(1), 11-18.
  50. Marques, A., Martins, I.S., Kastner, T., Plutzar, C., Theurl, M.C., Eisenmenger, N., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Wood, R., Stadler, K., Bruckner, M., Canelas, J., Hilbers, J.P., Tukker, A., Erb, K., & Pereira, H.M. (2019). Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(4), 628-637. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0824-3.
  51. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (2014). Guía Técnica para la formulación de los POMCAS, 104.
  52. Mitsuda, Y., & Ito, S. (2011). A review of spatial-explicit factors determining spatial distribution of land use/land-use change. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7(1), 117-125. doi: 10.1007/s11355-010-0113-4.
  53. Patel, M., Kok, K., & Rothman, D.S. (2007). Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy, 24(3), 546-561. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005.
  54. Reed, M.S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
  55. Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C.H., & Stringer, L.C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
  56. Reilly, K.H., Adamowski, J.F., & John, K. (2017). Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosystem Services, 30, 107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002.
  57. Robles-Morua, A., Halvorsen, K.E., Mayer, A.S., & Vivoni, E.R. (2014). Exploring the application of participatory modeling approaches in the Sonora River Basin, Mexico. Environmental Modelling and Software, 52, 273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.006.
  58. Rodriguez, D.A., Tomasella, J., & Linhares, C. (2010). Is the forest conversion to pasture affecting the hydrological response of Amazonian catchments? Signals in the Ji-Paran? Basin. Hydrological Processes, 24(10), 1254-1269. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7586.
  59. Sanderson, M.R., Bergtold, J.S., Heier Stamm, J.L., Caldas, M.M., & Ramsey, S.M. (2017). Bringing the “social” into sociohydrology: Conservation policy support in the Central Great Plains of Kansas, USA. Water Resources Research, 53(8), 6725-6743. doi: 10.1002/2017WR020659.
  60. Sierra, C.A., Mahecha, M., Poveda, G., Álvarez-Dávila, E., Gutierrez-Velez, V.H., Reu, B., Feilhauer, H., Anáya, J., Armenteras, D., Benavides, A.M., Buendia, C., Duque, Á., Estupiñan-Suarez, L.M., González, C., Gonzalez-Caro, S., Jimenez, R., Kraemer, G., Londoño, M.C., Orrego, S.A., … Skowronek, S. (2017). Monitoring ecological change during rapid socio-economic and political transitions: Colombian ecosystems in the post-conflict era. Environmental Science and Policy, 76(April), 40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.011.
  61. Siyum, Z.G. (2020). Tropical dry forest dynamics in the context of climate change: syntheses of drivers, gaps, and management perspectives. Ecological Processes, 9(1). doi: 10.1186/s13717-020-00229-6.
  62. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (2015). Managing Watersheds for Ecosystem Services in the Steepland Neotropics (J.S. Hall, V. Kirn, & E. Yaguas (Eds.)). doi: 10.18235/0000163.
  63. UPRA - Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria (2017). Departamento de Córdoba.
  64. Viola, M.R., Mello, C.R., Beskow, S., & Norton, L.D. (2014). Impacts of Land-use Changes on the Hydrology of the Grande River Basin Headwaters, Southeastern Brazil. Water Resources Management, 28(13), 4537-4550. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0749-1.
  65. Wassenaar, T., Gerber, P., Verburg, P.H., Rosales, M., Ibrahim, M., & Steinfeld, H. (2007). Projecting land use changes in the Neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 86-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.007.
  66. Wubie, M.A., Assen, M., & Nicolau, M.D. (2016). Patterns, causes and consequences of land use/cover dynamics in the Gumara watershed of lake Tana basin, Northwestern Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 5(1), 8. doi: 10.1186/s40068-016-0058-1.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...