Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Regular Articles

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023)

Healthy food consumption in the Covid-19 era: Empirical evidence from Italian consumers choices on functional products

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2023oa13842
Submitted
maggio 20, 2022
Published
2023-04-07

Abstract

This study provides an explorative analysis of the potential appreciation manifested by 312 Italian consumers for functional confectionery products, obtained from high-amylose soft wheat flours (high-amylose confectionery products, HACPs). An online questionnaire was administered in 2021, which assessed respondents’ willingness to pay (WTP) a premium price for HACPs with respect to non-functional confectionery products. Detailed information about respondents and their families was collected and put in relation with the willingness, or not, to pay a premium price for HACPs through a Binary Logit model. Two thirds of respondents were willing to pay a premium price for HACPs, that stood at +12.3%. Analysis of the results of the Binary Logit model led to highlight that respondents’ WTP for HACPs is positively influenced by age, level of family income, satisfaction with the latter during the COVID-19 pandemic, habit to purchase food products on e-commerce channels, adoption of healthy eating styles and belief that functional foods can contribute to improve well-being. At the opposite, respondents’ WTP is negatively influenced by family size, presence of dependent members and, interestingly, habit to practice physical activity with high frequency. Based on these findings, useful insights also in support of confectionery industry and commercial distribution are finally reported.

References

  1. Alongi, M., & Anese, M. (2021). Re-thinking functional food development through a holistic approach. Journal of Functional Foods, 81, 104466. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104466.
  2. Annunziata, A., & Vecchio, R. (2011). Functional foods development in the European market: A consumer perspective. Journal of Functional Foods, 3(3), 223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.011.
  3. Ares, G., & Gámbaro, A. (2007). Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods. Appetite, 49(1), 148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.006.
  4. Ares, G., Gimenez, A., & Gambaro, A. (2009). Consumer perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional milk desserts. Influence of ingredient, ingredient name and health claim. Food Quality and Preference, 20(1), 50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.07.002.
  5. Baglione, S.L., Tucci, L.A., & Stanton, J.L. (2012). Self-reported nutritional knowledge and the acceptance of health-related food benefit claims. British Food Journal, 114(4), 453-468. doi: 10.1108/00070701211219496.
  6. Baker, M.T., Lu, P., Parrella, J.A., & Leggette, H.R. (2022). Consumer acceptance toward functional foods: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031217.
  7. Barauskaite, D., Gineikiene, J., Fennis, B.M., Auruskeviciene, V., Yamaguchi, M., & Kondo, N. (2018). Eating healthy to impress: How conspicuous consumption, perceived self-control motivation, and descriptive normative influence determine functional food choices. Appetite, 131, 59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.015.
  8. Bentivoglio, D., Rotordam, M., Staffolani, G., Chiaraluce, G., & Finco, A. (2021). Understanding consumption choices of innovative products: an outlook on the Italian functional food market. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 6(3), 818-837. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021050.
  9. Bird, A.R., & Regina, A. (2018). High amylose wheat: A platform for delivering human health benefits. Journal of Cereal Science, 82, 99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.05.011.
  10. Bleiel, J. (2010). Functional foods from the perspective of the consumer: How to make it a success?. International Dairy Journal, 20(4), 303-306. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.11.009.
  11. Bruschi, V., Teuber, R., & Dolgopolova, I. (2015). Acceptance and willingness to pay for health-enhancing bakery products – Empirical evidence for young urban Russian consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 46, 79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.008.
  12. Castellini, A., Canavari, M., & Pirazzoli, C. (2002). Functional foods in the European Union: an overview of the sector’s main issues. In: Proceedings of 8th Joint Conference on Food, Agriculture and the Environment, Red Cedar Lake, Wisconsin, 25-28 August 2002. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.14456.
  13. Cavaliere, A., Ricci, E.C., & Banterle, A. (2015). Nutrition and health claims: Who is interested? An empirical analysis of consumer preferences in Italy. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.002.
  14. Data Bridge Market Research (2022). -- Retrieved from: www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-functional-confectionery-market.
  15. Del Giudice, T., Nebbia, S., & Pascucci, S. (2009). The role of consumer acceptance in the food innovation process: young consumer perception of functional food in Italy. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, Insbruck-Igls, Austria, 16-20 February 2009. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.59112.
  16. Diplock, A.T., Aggett, P.J., Ashwell, M., Bornet, F., Fern, E.B., & Roberfroid, M.B. (1999). Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. British Journal of Nutrition, 81, Suppl. 1, S1-S27. doi: 10.1079/BJN19990002.
  17. Euromonitor International (2022). -- URL: www.euromonitor.com/fortifiedfunctional-packaged-food-in-italy/report.
  18. Furno, M., Verneau, F., & Sannino, G. (2016). Assessing hypothetical bias: An analysis beyond the mean of functional food. Food Quality and Preference, 50, 15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.12.012.
  19. Gibson G.R., & Williams C.M. (Eds.) (2000). Functional foods, 9, 9-27. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Publishing.
  20. Henke, R., & Sardone, R. (2020). Innovation in the Italian Sector of Vending Machines. Between Growth and Search for Sustainability. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 75(2), 13-23. doi: 10.13128/rea-12067.
  21. Idda, L., Madau, F.A., & Pulina, P. (2008). The motivational profile of organic food consumers: a survey of specialized stores customers in Italy. In: Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists – EAAE 2008, Ghent, Belgium, 26-29 August 2008. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.43946.
  22. Jew, S., AbuMweis, S.S., & Jones, P.J. (2009). Evolution of the human diet: linking our ancestral diet to modern functional foods as a means of chronic disease prevention. Journal of Medicinal Food, 12(5), 925-934. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2008.0268.
  23. Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M. (2009). Impact of beliefs and attitudes on young consumers’ willingness to use functional food. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 59(2), 183-187.
  24. Karelakis, C., Zevgitis, P., Galanopoulos, K., & Mattas, K. (2020). Consumer trends and attitudes to functional foods. Journal of International Food Agribusiness Marketing, 32(3), 266-294. doi: 10.1080/08974438.2019.1599760.
  25. Kavoosi-Kalashami, M., Pourfarzad, A., Ghaibi, S., Allahyari, M.S., Surujlal, J., & Borsellino, V. (2017). Urban consumers’ attitudes and willingness to pay for functional foods in Iran: A case of dietary sugar. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2(3), 310-323. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.310.
  26. KBV Research (2021). -- Retrieved from: www.kbvresearch.com/functional-food-market/.
  27. Khan, R.S., Grigor, J.V., Win, A.G., & Boland, M. (2014). Differentiating aspects of product innovation processes in the food industry: An exploratory study on New Zealand. British Food Journal, 116(8), 1346-1368. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2013-0094.
  28. Kraus, A., Annunziata, A., & Vecchio, R. (2017). Sociodemographic factors differentiating the consumer and the motivations for functional food consumption. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 36(2), 116-126. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2016.1228489.
  29. Martirosyan, D., von Brugger, J., & Bialow, S. (2021). Functional food science: Differences and similarities with food science. Functional Foods in Health and Disease, 11(9), 408-430. doi: 10.31989/ffhd.v11i9.831.
  30. McCullough, D. (1998). Web-based market research: The dawning of a new age. DIRECT Mark. CITY, 61, 36-38.
  31. Moro, D., Veneziani, M., Sckokai, P., & Castellari, E. (2015). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Catechin-enriched Yogurt: Evidence from a Stated Choice Experiment. Agribusiness, 31(2), 243-258. doi: 10.1002/agr.21401.
  32. Moskowitz, H.R., Saguy, I.S., & Straus, T. (Eds.) (2009). An integrated approach to new food product development. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Publishing.
  33. Moutinho, P., Andrade, I., & Macedo, A. (2022). Functional food consumption by Portuguese university community: Knowledge, barriers and motivators. Economia agro-alimentare. doi: 10.3280/ecag2022oa13258.
  34. Newberry, M., Berbezy, P., Belobrajdic, D., Chapron, S., Tabouillot, P., Regina, A., & Bird, A.R. (2018). High-amylose wheat foods: A new opportunity to meet dietary fiber targets for health. Cereal Foods World, 63(5), 188-193. doi: 10.1094/CFW-63-5-0188.
  35. Paffarini, C., Torquati, B., Tempesta, T., Venanzi, S., & Vecchiato, D. (2021). Rural sustainability and food choice: the effect of territorial characteristics on the consumers’ preferences for organic lentils. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1186/s40100-021-0200-9.
  36. Palmieri, N., Stefanoni, W., Latterini, F., & Pari, L. (2021). An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica. Agriculture, 11(8), 701. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11080701.
  37. Palmieri, N., Stefanoni, W., Latterini, F., & Pari, L. (2022). Factors influencing Italian consumers’ willingness to pay for eggs enriched with omega-3-fatty acids. Foods, 11(4), 545. doi: 10.3390/foods11040545.
  38. Pappalardo, G., & Lusk, J.L. (2016). The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods. Food Quality and Preference, 53, 151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.009.
  39. Plasek, B., & Temesi, Á. (2019). The credibility of the effects of functional food products and consumers’ willingness to purchase/willingness to pay-review. Appetite, 143, 104398. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104398.
  40. Roberfroid, M.B. (2000). Prebiotics and probiotics: are they functional foods?. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(6), 1682S-1687S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1682S.
  41. Rodríguez, G. (2007). Lecture Notes on Generalized Linear Models. -- Retrieved from: https://grodri.github.io/glms/notes/.
  42. Saguy, I.S., & Moskowitz, H.R. (1999). Integrating the consumer into new product development. Food Technology, 53(8), 68-73.
  43. Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., & Kastenholz, H. (2008). Consumers’ willingness to buy functional foods. The influence of carrier, benefit and trust. Appetite, 51(3), 526-529. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.003.
  44. Siegrist, M., Shi, J., Giusto, A., & Hartmann, C. (2015). Worlds apart. Consumer acceptance of functional foods and beverages in Germany and China. Appetite, 92, 87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.017.
  45. Siró, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., & Lugasi, A. (2008). Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance – A review. Appetite, 51(3), 456-467. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060.
  46. Stein, A.J., & Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. (2008). Functional food in the European Union. Joint Research Centre. European Commission. doi: 10.2791/21607.
  47. The Business Research Company (2022). -- Retrieved from: www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/functional-foods-global-market-report.
  48. Topolska, K., Florkiewicz, A., & Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A. (2021). Functional Food – Consumer Motivations and Expectations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105327.
  49. Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L. (2001). Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 12(1), 29-37. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00025-2.
  50. Van Kleef, E., van Trijp, H.C., & Luning, P. (2005). Functional foods: health claimfood product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite, 44(3), 299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.009.
  51. Van Trijp, H.C., & Van der Lans, I.A. (2007). Consumer perceptions of nutrition and health claims. Appetite, 48(3), 305-324. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.011.
  52. Vecchio, R., Van Loo, E.J., & Annunziata, A. (2016). Consumers’ willingness to pay for conventional, organic and functional yogurt: evidence from experimental auctions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(3), 368-378. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12264.
  53. Vicentini, A., Liberatore, L., & Mastrocola, D. (2016). Functional foods: trends and development of the global market. Italian Journal of Food Science, 28(2), 338-351. doi: 10.14674/1120-1770/ijfs.v211.
  54. Vorage, L., Wiseman, N., Graca, J., & Harris, N. (2020). The Association of Demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults. Nutrients, 12(9), 2582. doi: 10.3390/nu12092582.
  55. Zanchini, R., Di Vita, G., & Brun, F. (2022). Lifestyle, psychological and sociodemographic drivers in functional food choice: a systematic literature review based on bibliometric and network analysis. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2022.2048361.
  56. Zhang, B., Fu, Z., Huang, J., Wang, J., Xu, S., & Zhang, L. (2018). Consumers’ perceptions, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for safe vegetables: a case study of Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1498-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.273A.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...