The journal's articles are subject to peer review. Each submission is initially evaluated by the Executive Editorial Board, which assesses its alignment with the editorial line. If the evaluation is positive, the manuscript is assigned to two reviewers, selected from the list of referees, the members of the Scientific Committee, or among external experts invited to contribute based on their recognized expertise.

The complete list of referees is kept by the Editorial Office and periodically published on the Journal’s website.

In the following step, the reviewers’ comments are communicated to the author. If the reviewers provide conflicting assessments, a third reviewer will be consulted.

The corrections made by the author will then be reviewed by the referees until the revisions are deemed satisfactory. If not, the Editorial Office will request further modifications based on the reviewers' feedback.

Before final acceptance, the manuscript must fully comply with the Journal’s editorial guidelines, according to the instructions provided by the Editorial Office.

List of referee:

Referees 2025

Overall list of referees