Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

No. 1 (2026)

Industry 5.0 in Waste Management: Uncovering the Dynamic Capabilities Behind the Transition

  • Maria Vincenza Ciasullo
  • Miriana Ferrara
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23330
Submitted
luglio 22, 2026
Published
2026-07-29

Abstract

Industry 5.0 represents a transformative paradigm that addresses disruptive megatrends by calling for a human-centred approach and sustainability orientation. Despite growing academic interest, little is known about how organisations are transitioning towards this innovative strategical posture, particularly in the service businesses. The study addresses this gap by investigating the dynamic capabilities that waste management organisations must activate to undertake the aforemen-tioned transition. Drawing on the Dynamic Capabilities Theory and a qualitative multiple-case study conducted on three Italian waste management firms, data were collected through 18 semi-structured interviews and archival sources and analysed by using the Gioia methodology. The results reveal three aggregate dimensions of capability such as: Waste Ecosystem Scanning Capability; People-Technology Orchestration Capability; Smart Waste Cycle Reconfiguration Capability. All togeth-er, these capabilities constitute an integrated architecture through which organisa-tions perceive environmental complexity, orchestrate technological and human re-sources, and reconfigure their strategic, operational, and relational processes.

References

  1. Anitha, R., & Parthiban, A. (2025). Smart waste ecosystems under industry 5.0: A framework integrating digital twins, edge-AI, graph theory, and 9R circularity. Results in Engineering, 107988. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107988.
  2. Beta, K., Nagaraj, S.S., & Coleman, A. (2025). Skills and dynamic capabilities for generative AI: embracing the Industry 5.0 paradigm and nourishing innovation in public institutions. Public Money Management, 1–15.DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2585357.
  3. Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0, towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5): 811-831. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337.
  4. Chauhan, A., Pandey, G., Attri, S., Sethi, M., Singh, M.V., Barrili, S., & Malimba, P.M. (2026). Revolutionizing Waste Management: Harnessing AI and Industry 5.0 Applications for Sustainable Solutions. In The Circular Path: Rethinking Waste for a Sustainable Future (pp. 251-268). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  5. Ciasullo, M.V., & Ferrara, M. (2025). The nexus between sustainability and industry 5.0: a hybrid systematic review and future research agenda. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(1): 61-79. DOI: 10.1002/joe.70000.
  6. Ciasullo, M.V., Calabrese, M., & La Sala, A. (2024). Surfing across industrial revolutions: A resilient sensemaking perspective on innovation. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2): 27-42. DOI: 10.1002/joe.22219.
  7. Ciasullo, M.V., La Sala, A., & Ferrara, M. (2023, April). Normalizing digitization into a new 5.0 equilibrium. Insights from socio-ecological systems. In The International Research & Innovation Forum (pp. 107-115). Springer International Publishing.
  8. Das, S., Lee, S.H., Kumar, P., Kim, K.H., Lee, S.S., & Bhattacharya, S.S. (2019). Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228: 658-678. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323.
  9. Destouet, C., Tlahig, H., Bettayeb, B., & Mazari, B. (2023). Flexible job shop scheduling problem under Industry 5.0: A survey on human reintegration, environmental consideration and resilience improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 67: 155-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.01.004.
  10. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.
  11. Ghobakhloo, M., Fathi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Vilkas, M., Grybauskas, A., & Amran, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in manufacturing: opportunities for actualizing Industry 5.0 sustainability goals. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(9): 94-121. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2023-0530.
  12. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Tseng, M.L., Grybauskas, A., Stefanini, A., & Amran, A. (2023). Behind the definition of Industry 5.0: A systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 40(6): 432–447. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2023. 2216701.
  13. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M.F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying Industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33: 716-737. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003
  14. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., & Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16(1): 15-31. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112452151.
  15. Gomathi, L., Mishra, A.K., & Tyagi, A.K. (2023, April). Industry 5.0 for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities, challenges and future research possibilities. In 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) (pp. 204-213). IEEE.
  16. Govindaraj, M., Gnanasekaran, C., Ramasamy, M.M.S., & Suresh, N.R.V. (2024, November). Beyond conventional methods: A cost-benefit analysis of Industry 5.0 inspired machinery for solid waste management in the digital circular economy. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3192, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
  17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1): 59-82. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
  18. Hashim, M.A.M., Tlemsani, I., Mason-Jones, R., Matthews, R., & Ndrecaj, V. (2024). Higher education via the lens of Industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9: 100828. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828.
  19. Helfat, C.E., & Peteraf, M.A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management journal, 36(6): 831-850. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2247.
  20. Hussain, S., Singh, A.M., Mohanty, P., & Gavinolla, M.R. (2023). Next-generation employability and career sustainability in the hospitality industry 5.0. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 15(3): 308–321.
  21. Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1): 23606. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v9.23606.
  22. ISPRA Report (2024) available at: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2024/pubblicazioni/rapporti/rapportorifiutiurbani_ed-2024_n406_versione_integrale.pdf
  23. Kvale, S. (2007). Learning the craft of interviewing.
  24. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews—Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. Applied sciences, 10(12): 4182. DOI: 10.3390/app10124182.
  26. Maddikunta, P.K.R., Pham, Q.V., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T.R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of industrial information integration, 26, 100257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257.
  27. Magnani, G., & Gioia, D. (2023). Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research. International business review, 32(2): 102097. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102097.
  28. Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2023). Can Industry 5.0 be seen as a remedy for the problem of waste in industrial companies? Procedia Computer Science, 225: 1816-1825. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.171.
  29. Modgil, S., Singh, R.K., & Agrawal, S. (2025). Developing human capabilities for supply chains: an industry 5.0 perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 348(3): 2075-2105. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05245-1.
  30. Mohammed, A., Al Balushi, F. A., Zubairu, N., & Govindan, K. (2025). Dynamics capabilities 5.0 toward inner business resiliency: A conceptual and evaluation panacea. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 206: 111223. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.111223.
  31. Montera, R., Nevi, G., & Cucari, N. (2026). Framing Quality 5.0 through purpose governance: a conceptual model for humanizing organizations. The TQM Journal, 1-23. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-08-2025-0476.
  32. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0 􀯅 A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16): 4371. DOI: 10.3390/su11164371.
  33. Naughtin, C.K., Schleiger, E., Bratanova, A., Terhorst, A., & Hajkowicz, S. (2024). Forty years in the making: A systematic review of the megatrends literature. Futures, 103329. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2024.103329.
  34. Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  35. Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 4: 49-63. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243.n4.
  36. Renda, A., Schwaag Serger, S., Tataj, D., Morlet, A., et al. (2021). Industry 5.0, a transformative vision for Europe: Governing systemic transformations towards a sustainable industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
  37. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  38. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  39. Sustainable development foundation Report (2024) available at https://www.fondazionesvilupposostenibile.org/wpcontent/uploads/dlm_uploads/il-RICICLO-in-ITALIA-2024.pdf
  40. Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of dynamic capabilities and their role in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640.
  41. Teece, D.J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms, 37, 211-225. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  42. Teece, D.J. (2023). The evolution of the dynamic capabilities framework. In Artificiality and sustainability in entrepreneurship: Exploring the unforeseen, and paving the way to a sustainable future (pp. 113-129). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  43. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  44. Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6): 511-521. DOI: 10.1177/1077800411409884.
  45. Turner III, D.W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3): 754-760. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1178.
  46. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of manufacturing systems, 61: 530-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006.
  47. Yin, R.K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
  48. Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
  49. Zoumpoulis, P., Konstantinidis, F.K., Tsimiklis, G., & Amditis, A. (2024, May). Advancing urban waste management using Industry 5.0 principles: A novel smart bin. In 2024 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0 & IoT) (pp. i-vi). IEEE.