Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

No. 1 (2020)

How “complex” is growth? A panel analysis in 27 European area countries

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/cgrds1-2020oa10104
Submitted
giugno 30, 2020
Published
2020-11-25

Abstract

This paper aims to build a bridge between the economic complexity and endogenous growth stream of works. Traditional growth empirical and theoretical literature tend to underestimate the relevance of the effects exerted by the systematic interactions among the growth factors. In this vein, this work adapts the Mankiw et al. (1992) model in order to consider, in the technological component of the growth function, a measure of the country’s system economic complexity. The empirical analysis refers to a panel of 27 European area countries for 12 years (2007-2018). Implementing both traditional panel estimation approach (fixed and random effects model) and dynamic generalized method of moments (system-GMM) approach, the findings obtained reveal that the economic complexity index (ECI) represents a primary determinant of actual growth path.

References

  1. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60: 323-351. DOI: 10.2307/2951599
  2. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press.
  3. Arellano M., Bond S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of economic studies, 58(2): 277-297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968.
  4. Arellano M., Bover O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68: 29-51. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d.
  5. Arrow K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of economic studies, 29: 155-73. DOI: 10.2307/2295952.
  6. Arthur W.B. (1999). Complexity and the economy. Science, 284: 107-109. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5411.107.
  7. Balassa B. (1965), Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage. The Manchester school, 33: 99-123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
  8. Baltagi B.H., Li D. (2002). Series estimation of partially linear panel data models with fixed effects. Annals of Economics and Finance, 3(1): 103-116.
  9. Barro R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of political economy, 98: S103-S105. DOI: 10.1086/261726.
  10. Becker G.S. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research: Distributed by Columbia University Press.
  11. Beinhocker E.D. (2006). The origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Harvard Business Press.
  12. Blundell R., Bond S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87: 115–143. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8.
  13. Chenery H.B. (1960). Patterns of industrial growth. The American Economic Review, 50(4): 624-654. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812463.
  14. Domar E. (1946). Capital expansion, rate of growth and employment. Econometrica, 14: 137-147. DOI: 10.2307/1905364.
  15. Ferrarini B., Scaramozzino P. (2016). Production complexity, adaptability and economic growth. Structural change and economic dynamics, 37: 52-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2015.12.001.
  16. Fukuyama F. (1996). Trust: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. Free Press Paperbacks.
  17. Furtado C. (1964). Development and underdevelopment. University of California Press.
  18. Gala P., Rocha I., Magacho G. (2018). The structuralist revenge: economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development. Brazilian journal of political economy, 38: 219-236. DOI: 10.1590/0101-31572018v38n02a01.
  19. Grossman G., Helpman E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of economic studies, 58: 43-61. DOI: 10.2307/2298044.
  20. Harrod R.F. (1939). An essay in dynamic theory. The economic journal, 49: 14-33. DOI: 10.2307/2225181.
  21. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C.A., Bustos S., Coscia M., Chung S., Jimenez J., Simoes A., Yildirim M.A. (2011). The atlas of economic complexity. Mapping paths to prosperity. Growth Lab at Harvard University.
  22. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C.A., Bustos S., Coscia M., Simoes A., Yildirim M.A. (2013). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press.
  23. Hausmann R., Klinger B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative. Center for International Development at Harvard University, Working Paper No.146.
  24. Hidalgo C.A. (2015). Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies. New York: Penguin Press.
  25. Hidalgo C.A., Hausmann R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS 106: 10570-10575. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900943106.
  26. Hirschman A.O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  27. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H.S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56: 1371-1395. DOI: 10.2307/1913103.
  28. Kaldor N. (1967). Strategic factors in economic development. New York State School of industrial and labor relations. Ithaca, NY.
  29. Kuznets S. (1966). Modern economic growth: rate, structure and spread. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT.
  30. Lewis A.W. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester school, 22: 139-191. DOI: 1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x.
  31. Lucas R.E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22: 3-42. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.
  32. Mankiw N.G., Romer D., Weil D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly journal of economics, 107: 407-437. DOI: 10.2307/2118477.
  33. Mitchell M. (2009). Complexity. A guided tour. Oxford University Press.
  34. Myrdal G. (1957). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Gerald Duckworth.
  35. Nurkse R. (1953). The problem of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  36. Prebisch R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations, New York.
  37. Prebisch R. (1959). Commercial policy in underdeveloped countries. The American Economic Review, 49(2): 251–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816120.
  38. Romer P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94: 1002–1037. DOI: 10.1086/261420.
  39. Romer P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political economy, 98: S71–S102. DOI: 10.1086/261725.
  40. Romer P.M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of economic perspectives, 8: 3-22. DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.1.3.
  41. Rosenstein-Rodan P.N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of eastern and southeastern Europe. The economic journal, 53: 202–211. DOI: 10.2307/2226317.
  42. Rostow W.W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. The economic history review, 12: 1-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.1959.tb01829.x.
  43. Sbardella A., Pugliese E., Zaccaria A., Scaramozzino P. (2018). The role of complex analysis in modelling economic growth. Entropy, 20: 883. DOI: 10.3390/e20110883.
  44. Schultz T.W. (1963). The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.
  45. Singer H.W. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review, 40(2): 473-485. WOS: 000203281600038.
  46. Solow R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70: 65-94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513.
  47. Stojkoski V., Kocarev L. (2017). The relationship between growth and economic complexity: Evidence from southeastern and central Europe. MPRA Paper No. 77837.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...