Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

temi e progetti

N. 103 (2022)

Infrastrutture globali e divenire urbano. Pireo, Trieste e il ‘Corridoio Adriatico’

  • Francesca Governa
  • Angelo Sampieri
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2022-103002OA
Inviata
4 December 2023
Pubblicato
19-12-2023

Abstract

Come osservare e interrogare gli spazi costruiti e trasformati dai grandi progetti infrastrutturali? Quali gli attori, le strategie e le scale da tenere sotto osservazione? Quali le relazioni fra il cosiddetto ‘global infrastructure turn’ e le dinamiche di urbanizzazione? Ponendo queste domande l’articolo introduce i testi del servizio che, nel suo insieme, si interroga sulle trasformazioni spaziali connesse al recente sviluppo infrastrutturale lungo il cosiddetto ‘Corridoio Adriatico’, a partire dai porti di Trieste e del Pireo. L’articolo discute la necessità di superare una visione puramente tecnica delle infrastrutture e dei processi che le riguardano, per riconoscerne l’attuale ‘salto di scala’ e vedere dal terreno tali interventi come parte delle nuove forme del fenomeno urbano contemporaneo.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Amin A., 2002, «Spatialities of globalisation». Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34, 3: 385-399. Doi: 10.1068/a3439.
  2. Amin A., 2014, «Lively infrastructure». Theory, Culture & Society, 31, 7-8: 137-161. Doi: 10.1177/0263276414548490.
  3. Amin A., Lancione M., 2002, eds., Grammars of the Urban Ground. Londra: Duke.
  4. Amin A., Thrift N., 2016, Seeing Like a City. Cambridge: Polity (trad. it., 2020, Vedere come una Città. Milano: Mimemis).
  5. Angelo H., Wachsmuth D., 2015, «Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 1: 16-27. Doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12105.
  6. Apostolopoulou E., 2021a, «A novel geographical research agenda on Silk Road urbanisation». The Geographical Journal, 187, 4: 386-393. Doi: 10.1111/geoj.12412.
  7. Apostolopoulou E., 2021b, «Tracing the links between infrastructure-led development, urban transformation, and inequality in China’s Belt and Road Initiative». Antipode, 53, 3: 831-858. Doi: 10.1111/anti.12699.
  8. Bonino M., Governa F., Repellino M.P., Sampieri A., 2019, eds., The city after Chinese New Towns: Spacesand imaginaries from contemporary urban China. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  9. Brenner N., Katsikis N., 2018, «Operational landscapes: Hinterlands of the capitalocene». AD Architectural Design, 90, 1: 22-31. Doi:10.1002/ad.2521.
  10. Brenner N., Schmidt C., 2014 «The ‘Urban Age’ in Question». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 3: 731-755. Doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12115.
  11. Brenner N., Schmidt C., 2015, «Towards a new epistemology of the urban?». City, 19, 2-3: 151-182. Doi: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.
  12. Dodson J., 2017, «The Global Infrastructure Turn and Urban Practice». Urban Policy and Research, 35, 1: 87-92, Doi: 10.1080/08111146.2017.1284036.
  13. D’Amelio D., 2022, «Porto, il colosso cinese COSCO sceglie Trieste: Ecco il nuovo gate per l’Europa Centrale». Il Piccolo. Trieste, 27 giugno. https://ilpiccolo.gelocal.it/trieste/cronaca/2022/06/27/news/porto-il-colosso-cinese-cosco-sceglie-trieste-ecco-il-nuovo-gate-per-l-europa-centrale-1.41540056 (accesso 2023.01.23).
  14. Easterling K., 2014, Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. Londra-New York: Verso (trad. it., 2019, Lo Spazio in cui ci Muoviamo: L’Infrastruttura come Sistema Operativo. Torino: Treccani).
  15. Fei D., 2017, «Worlding developmentalism: China’s economic zones within and beyond its border». Journal of International Development, 29, 6: 825-850. Doi: 10.1002/jid.3277.
  16. Filion P., Keil R., 2017, «Contested infrastructures: Tension, inequity and innovation in the Global Suburb». Urban Policy and Research, 35, 1: 7-19. Doi: 10.1080/08111146.2016.1187122.
  17. Fujiya M., Krugman P., Mori T., 1999, «On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems». European Economic Review, 43, 2: 209-251. Doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00066-X.
  18. Furlong K., 2021, «Geographies of infrastructure III: Infrastructure with Chinese characteristics». Progress in Human Geography, 46, 3: 915-925. Doi: 10.1177/03091325211033652.
  19. Governa F., Sampieri A., 2020, «Urbanisation processes and new towns in contemporary China: A critical understanding from a decentred view». Urban Studies, 57, 2: 366-382. Doi: 10.1177/0042098019860807.
  20. Graham S., Marvin, S., 2001, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Londra: Routledge.
  21. Henderson V., 2003, «The urbanization process and economic growth: The so what question». Journal of Economic Growth, 8: 47-71. Doi: 10.1023/A:1022860800744.
  22. Kanai J.M., Schindler S., 2022, «Infrastructure-led development and the peri-urban question: Furthering crossover comparisons». Urban Studies, 59, 8: 1597-1617. Doi: 10.1177/00420980211064158.
  23. Krugman P., 1991, «Increasing returns and economic geography». Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-499. Doi: 10.1086/261763.
  24. Larkin B., 2013, «The politics and poetics of infrastructure». Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 1: 327-343. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.
  25. LeCavalier J., 2016, The Rule of Logistics: Walmart and the Architecture of Fulfillment. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  26. LeCavalier J., 2019, «Human exclusion zones: Logistics and new machine landscapes». AD Architectural Design, 89, 1: 48-55. Doi: 10.1002/ad.2388.
  27. Liu W., Dunford M., 2016, «Inclusive globalization: Unpacking China’s Belt and Road Initiative». Area Development and Policy, 1, 30: 323-340. Doi: 0.1080/23792949.2016.1232598.
  28. Lyster C., 2016, Learning from Logistics: How Networks Change Our Cities. Basilea: Birkhäuser.
  29. Lyster C., 2019, «Disciplinary hybrids». AD Architectural Design. Special Issue: Machine Landscape. Architecture of the Post-Anthropocene, 89, 1: 100-105. Doi: 10.1002/ad.2396.
  30. Murton G., 2021, «Power of Blank Spaces: A Critical Cartography of China’s Belt and Road Initiative». Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62, 3: 274-280. Doi:10.1111/apv.12318.
  31. Oakes T., 2021, «The Belt and Road as method: Geopolitics, technopolitics and power through an infrastructure lens». Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62, 3: 281-285. Doi: 10.1111/apv.12319.
  32. Oliveira G. de L.T., Murton G., Rippa A., Harlan T., Yang Y., 2020, «China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Views from the ground». Political Geography, 82, pubblicazione anticipata online. Doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102225.
  33. Ramondetti L., 2022, The Enriched Field: Urbanising the Central Plains of China. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  34. Roy A., 2016, «What is urban about critical urban theory?». Urban Geography, 37, 6: 810-823. Doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105485.
  35. Safina A., Ramondetti L., Governa F., 2023, «Rescaling the Belt and Road Initiative in urban China: The local complexities of a global project». Area Development and Policy (pubblicazione anticipata online). Doi: 10.1080/23792949.2023.2174888.
  36. Schindler S., Kanai J.M., 2021, «Getting the territory right: Infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies». Regional Studies, 55, 1: 40-51. Doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984.
  37. Scholvin S., 2021, «Getting the territory wrong: The dark side of development corridors». Area Development and Policy, 6, 4: 441-450. Doi: 10.1080/23792949.2021.1940227.
  38. Silver J., 2021, «Corridor urbanism». In: Lancione M., McFarlane C. (eds.), Global Urbanism. Londra: Routledge, 251-58.
  39. Simone A., 2019, «Maximum exposure: Making sense in the background of extensive urbanization». Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37, 6: 990-1006. Doi: 10.1177/0263775819856351.
  40. Star S.L., 1999, «The ethnography of infrastructure». American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 3: 377-391. Doi: 10.1177/0002764992195532.
  41. Steele W., Legacy C., 2017, «Critical urban infrastructure». Urban Policy and Research, 35, 1: 1-6. Doi: 10.1080/08111146.2017.1283751.
  42. Summers T., 2016, «China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: Sub-national regions and networks of global political economy». Third World Quarterly, 37, 9: 1628-1643. Doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415.
  43. Summers T., 2020, «Negotiating the boundaries of China’s Belt and Road Initiative». Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38, 5: 809-813. Doi: 10.1177/2399654420911410b.
  44. Toops S., 2016, «Reflections on China’s Belt and Road Initiative». Area Development and Policy, 1, 3: 352-360. Doi: 10.1080/23792949.2016.1233072.
  45. Turner C., 2021, The Infrastructured State: Territoriality and the National Infrastructure System. Londra: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  46. Wall A.,1999, «Programming the urban surface». In: Corner J. (ed.), Recovering Landscapes. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 232-249.
  47. Wiig A., Silver J., 2019, «Turbulent presents, precarious futures: Urbanization and the deployment of global infrastructure». Regional Studies, 53, 6: 912-23. Doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566703.
  48. Winter T., 2019, Geocultural power: China’s quest to revive the Silk Roads for the twenty-first century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  49. Yeh E.T., Wharton E., 2016, «Going west and going out: Discourses, migrants, and models in Chinese development». Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57, 3: 286-315. Doi: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1235982.
  50. Young L., 2019, «Neo-machine: Architecture without people». AD Architectural Design, 89, 1: 6-13. Doi: 10.1002/ad.2381.
  51. Yu H., 2017, «Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank». Journal of Contemporary China, 26, 105: 353-368. Doi: 10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...