Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Gender Inequalities in Academia: Work, Organizational Cultures, and Policies

2024

Diseguaglianze di genere in accademia: approcci multipli per chiudere il ga

  • Emanuela Lombardo
  • Manuela Naldini
  • Barbara Poggio
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2024-168001
Inviata
9 maggio 2024
Pubblicato
29-05-2024

Abstract

Questo numero speciale intende contribuire al dibattito sulle disuguaglianze di genere nel mondo accademico e sulle politiche di parità che le affrontano. In questa introduzione offriamo una panoramica del dibattito e delle principali questioni di ricerca e prospettive teoriche, mostrando come siano necessari una molteplicità di approcci sia per comprendere che per trasformare l’università. Gli approcci che prestano attenzione al livello macro, meso e micro mettono in luce i fattori individuali, culturali e istituzionali di genere che limitano e consentono la vita accademica, con particolare attenzione al modo in cui la svolta neoliberista, e le sue implicazioni in termini organizzativi, esacerbano le disuguaglianze di genere. Gli approcci centrati sulle donne, sul genere, sulla cura e sull’intersezionalità consentono di concentrarsi sulle diverse relazioni di genere o intersezionali all’interno del mondo accademico. Gli approcci orientati alle politiche ci consentono di analizzare e valutare i progressi negli sforzi istituzionali per colmare il divario sulle disuguaglianze di genere nel mondo accademico. Gli studi incentrati sugli attori mettono in luce le lotte di potere tra attori che si oppongono o promuovono le politiche di parità di genere nel mondo accademico.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Addis, E. (2008). Genere ed eccellenza. La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 2:199-230.
  2. Addis, E. and Villa, P. (2003). The editorial boards of Italian economics journals: women, gender, and social networking. Feminist Economics, 9(1): 75-91. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000057062].
  3. Ahrens, P., Erzeel, S., Evans, E., Kantola, J., Kuhar, R. and Lombardo, E. (2021). Gender and politics research in Europe: towards a consolidation of a flourishing political science subfield? European Political Science, 20: 105-122. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00304-8]
  4. Allen. A. (1999). The power of feminist theory, New York: Routledge.
  5. Alonso, A., Ciccia, R., and Lombardo, E. (2023). A Southern European model? Gender regime change in Italy and Spain. Women’s Studies International Forum, 98 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102737]
  6. Azmat, G. and Petrongolo, B. (2014). Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments?. Labour Economics, 30: 32-40. [doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.005]
  7. Azzolina, L., Naldini, M. and Poggio, B. (2023). Processi di governance, culture di genere e politiche. Un’analisi multilivello.n Naldini, M., Poggio, B. (eds.) Genere e accademia. Carriere, culture e politiche, Bologna:Il Mulino, 307-338.
  8. Bosak, J. and Sczesny, S. (2008). Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position, Sex Roles, 58(9-10): 682-688. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9380-4]
  9. Bozzon, R., Murgia, A., and Poggio, B. (2018) Gender and precarious careers in academia and research. Macro, meso and micro perspectives. In Murgia, A., Poggio, B. (eds.) Gender and Precarious Research Careers: A Comparative Analysis, Routledge, 15-49.
  10. Bustelo, M. (2023). Resilience and gender-structural change in universities: How bottom-up approaches can leverage transformation when top-level management support fails. Sociologica 17(2): 17–36. [https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17787].
  11. Cannito, M., Carreri, A. and Poggio, B. (2023). Culture organizzative di genere: cittadinanza, pratiche e politiche in accademia. In Naldini, M., Poggio, B. (eds) Genere e accademia. Carriere, culture e politiche, Bologna, Il Mulino, 225-250.
  12. Cannito, M., Poggio, B. and Tuselli, A. (2023). Gender Equality Plans. Processes, potentialities, contradictions and resistances in contexts of science production. About Gender, 12(24).
  13. Cannito, M., Naldini, M. and Santero, A. (2023). Investigating the Glass Ceiling in Italian Academia. Women’s Strategies and Barriers to Career Advancement. Sociologica, 17(2): 1-22. https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/17592 [https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17592].
  14. Carriero, R. and Naldini, M (2022). Gender Disparity in Access to Academia in Italy. The barriers to women’s early career stages. Polis, 1:5-32. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1424/103557].
  15. Carreri, A., and Naldini, M. and Tuselli, A. (2024). Inequalities in Academic Work during Covid-19: The Intersection of Gender, Class, and Individuals’ Life-Course Stage. Social Sciences, 13(3):162. [https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030162].
  16. Castaño, C., Vázquez-Cupeiro, S. and Martínez-Cantos, J.L. (2019). Gendered management in Spanish universities: Functional segregation among vice-rectors. Gender and Education, 31(8): 966–985. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1410109]
  17. Castro M.R. and Holvino E. (2016). Applying Intersectionality in Organizations: Inequality Markers, Cultural Scripts and Advancement Practices in a Professional Service Firm. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3): 328-347. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12129]
  18. Checchi, D., Cicognani, S. and Kulic, N. (2019). Gender Quotas or Girls’ Networks? Evidence from an Italian Research Selection, Work, Employment and Society, 33(3): 462-482. [https://doi.org/10.1177/095001701881307].
  19. Cho S., Crenshaw, K. W., and McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory applications, and praxis. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4): 785-810. [https://doi.org/10.1086/669608]
  20. Christoffersen, A. (2021). The Politics of Intersectional Practice: Competing Concepts of Intersectionality. Policy & Politics, 49(4): 573-593. [https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16194316141034]
  21. Clavero, S. and Galligan, Y. (2020). Analysing gender and institutional change in academia: evaluating the utility of feminist institutionalist approaches. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(6): 650-666, [DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2020.1733736]
  22. Cois, E., Naldini, M. and Solera, C. (2023). Addressing Gender Inequality in National Academic Contexts. An Introduction to the Symposium “Don’t Fix Women, Fix Academia?”. Sociologica, 18 (2) [https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18373]
  23. Collins, P.H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and Politics of Empowerment, Hove: Psychology Press.
  24. Collins, P.H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41: 1–20. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142].
  25. Connell, R. (2015). The knowledge economy and university workers. Australian Universities' Review, 57(2), 91-95.
  26. Crenshaw, K.W. (1989). Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8): 139-167.
  27. Croson, R. and Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 448-474. [DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448]
  28. De Paola, M., Ponzo, M. and Scoppa, V. (2018). Are Men Given Priority for Top Jobs? Investigating the Glass Ceiling in the Italian Academia. Journal of Human Capital, 12(3): 475-503. [https://doi.org/10.1086/698133]
  29. Docka‐Filipek, D. and Stone, L. B. (2021). Twice a “housewife”: On academic precarity, “hysterical” women, faculty mental health, and service as gendered care work for the “university family” in pandemic times. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(6):2158–2179. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12723]
  30. Douglas H. M., Settles I. H, Cech E. A., Montgomery G. M., Nadolsky L. R., Hawkins A. K., Ma G., Davis T. M., Elliott K. C., Spence Cheruvelil K. (2022). Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early-career academic scientists. PLoS ONE, 17(9): e0274278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274278
  31. Filandri, M. and Pasqua, S. (2021). Being good isn’t good enough’: gender discrimination in Italian academia, Studies in Higher Education, 46(8):1533-1551. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2019.1693990
  32. Gaiaschi, C. and Musumeci, R. (2020). Just a Matter of Time? Women’s Career Advancement in Neo-Liberal Academia. An Analysis of Recruitment Trends in Italian Universities, Social Sciences, 9(9): 163. [https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9090163]
  33. Garforth, L. and Kerr, A. (2009). Women and science: What's the problem?, Social Politics, 16(3): 379-403. [https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp015]
  34. Gill, R. 2009. Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. In Flood, R. and Gill, R. (eds.) Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, London: Routledge, 228–244.
  35. Gorodetskaya, O., Vitali, A. Tocchioni, V. and Minello, A. (2023). The best time to become a parent: the effect of tenure on fertility among academics in Italy, paper presented at Final Conference PRIN-GEa Gendering Academia “Percorsi nell’accademia italiana. Squilibri di genere e politiche di parità”, Università di Torino, 30 nov-1 dic 2023.
  36. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6): 581-592. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581].
  37. Johansson, J., Gao, G., Sölvell, I. and Wigren Kristoferson, C. (2024). Exploring caring collaborations in academia through feminist reflexive dialogs. Gender, Work and Organization, Early view [https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13115].
  38. Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  39. Kasymova, S., Place, J. M., Billings, D. and Aldape J. D. (eds) (2021), Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the productivity of academics who mother. Gender Work and Organization. 1–15.
  40. King, M. M., and Frederickson, M. (2020). The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity. SocArXiv. September 12.
  41. La Barbera, M. (2017). Intersectionality and its Journeys: from Counterhegemonic Feminist Theories to Law of European Multilevel Democracy. Investigaciones Feministas 8(1): 131–149. [https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.54858].
  42. Le Feuvre, N. (2009). Exploring women's academic careers in cross-national perspective: Lessons for equal opportunity policies, in Equal Opportunities International, 28(1): 9-23. [DOI:10.1108/02610150910933604]
  43. Leira, A. (1994) Concept of caring: loving, thinking and doing. Social Service Review, June, 185-201.
  44. Leira, A. and Saraceno, C. (2002). 3. Care: actors, relationships and contexts. In Hobson, B., Lewis, J. and Siim B. (eds.), Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Elgar, p. 55-83.
  45. Lombardo, E. and Bustelo, M. (2021). Sexual and sexist harassment in Spanish universities: policy implementation and resistances against gender equality measures, Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1): 8-22. Open access [https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1924643]
  46. Lund, R. (2012). Publishing to become an ideal academic: An institutional ethnography and feminist critique. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(3): 218–228. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.003]
  47. Lutter; M. and Schröder, M. (2019). Is there a motherhood penalty in academia? The gendered effect of children on academic publications in German Sociology. European Journal of Sociology, 36(3):442-459. [https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz067]
  48. Mairesse, J. and Pezzoni, M. (2015). Does Gender Affect Scientific Productivity : A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Panel Data Econometric Analysis for French Physicists. Revue économique, 66: 65-113. [https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.661.0065]
  49. Minello, A., and Russo (2021). Dentro lo schema: accademiche italiane tra ricerca e didattica. Sociologia del lavoro, 160(2):88-109.
  50. Minello, A., Martucci, S. and Manzo, L.K.C. (2021) The Pandemic and the Academic Mothers: Present Hardships and Future Perspectives. European Societies, 23 (sup1):82–94.
  51. Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H. and Templer, A. (2012). Gender, Work Time, and Care Responsibilities Among Faculty 1. Sociological Forum, 27(2): 300-323. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01319.x]
  52. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. and Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41): 16474-16479. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109]
  53. Murgia, A. and Poggio, B. (2019). Gender and precarious research careers: A comparative analysis, London: Routledge.
  54. Musselin, C. (2005). European Academic Labour Markets in Transition, in Higher Education, 49: 135-154. [DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-2918-2].
  55. Naldini, M. and Poggio, B. (2023). Genere e accademia. Carriere, culture e politiche, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  56. OECD (2017). The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle, Paris, OECD Publishing.
  57. Paternotte, D. and M. Verloo. (2020). Political Science at Risk in Europe. Frailness and the Study of Power. In Boncourt, T., Engeli, I, and Garcia, D. (eds) Political Science in Europe. Achievements, Challenges, Prospects, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 287–310.
  58. Pautasso, M. (2015). The Italian university habilitation and the challenge of increasing the representation of women in academia. Challenges, 6(1): 26-41. [https://doi.org/10.3390/challe6010026]
  59. Pereira do Mar, M. (2021). Researching Gender Inequalities in Academic Labour during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Common Problems and Asking Different Questions. Gender, Work & Organization, 28: 498-509.
  60. Picardi, I. (2019). The glass door of academia: Unveiling new gendered bias in academic recruitment. Social Sciences, 8(5): 160 [https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050160].
  61. Poggio, B. (2018). Structural changes in higher education in the neoliberal age. Insight from Connell’s theory, in R. Connell, P. Martin, J. W. Messerschmidt, M. Messner (eds.) Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research, pp. 234-260, New York, New York University Press.
  62. Rosa, R. and Clavero, S. (2022). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies 31(1): 1-7 [https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2007446]
  63. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism. Gender and Society, 18(4): 429-450. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349]
  64. Risman, B.J. and Davis, (2013). From sex roles to gender structure. Current Sociology, 61(5-6): 733-755 [https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479315].
  65. Schiebinger, L. (2021). Gendered Innovations: integrating sex, gender, and intersectional analysis into science, health & medicine, engineering, and environment, Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1). [DOI: 10.1080/25729861.2020.1867420]
  66. Tildesley, R. La Barbera, M. and Lombardo, E. (2023). “What Use is the Legislation to Me?” Contestations Around the Meanings of Gender Equality in Legislation and Its Strategic Use to Drive Structural Change in University Organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 30(6): 1–18. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13039].
  67. Tildesley, R., Lombardo, E. and Verge, T. (2022). Power Struggles in the Implementation of Gender Equality Policies: The Politics of Resistance and Counter-resistance in Universities, Politics & Gender, 18(4): 879-910 Open access [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000167]
  68. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care, Routledge, New York
  69. Uhly, K. M., Visser, L. M. and Zippel, K. S. (2017). Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4): 760-782. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1072151]
  70. Van den Brink, M and Benschop, Y (2012). Slaying the Seven‐Headed Dragon: The Quest for Gender Change in Academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(1): 71–92. [doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x]
  71. Van den Brink, M. and Benschop, Y. (2011). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4): 507-524. [https://doi.org/10.1177/135050841141429].
  72. Verge, T. (2021). Gender equality policy and universities: Feminist strategic alliances to re-gender the curriculum. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. Epub. June 2. [DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2021.1904763].
  73. Verge, T, Ferrer-Fons, M and González, MJ (2018). Resistance to Mainstreaming Gender into the Higher Education Curriculum. European Journal of Women’s Studies 25(1): 86–101. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816688237].
  74. Waerness, K. (1987). On the rationality of caring. In Sasson, A. S. (ed), Women and the State, London, Hutchinson, 207-34.
  75. Waite, D. and Waite S.F. (2021). The Work of the Neoliberal University: A Critique. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Third International Handbook of Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Cham. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66003-1_10]
  76. Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529-560. [https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052]
  77. Witz, A. (1990). Patriarchy and Professions: The Gendered Politics of Occupational Closure. Sociology, 24(4), 675-690. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024004007]

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...