Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articoli

No. 4 (2023)

Risk of recidivism among offenders: Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of the Italian Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2023oa18304
Submitted
agosto 5, 2024
Published
2024-08-08

Abstract

In the realm of national justice systems, the psychosocial evaluation of recidivism risk among offenders primarily relies on unstructured clinical judgement, often leading to errors and inefficiencies in resource allocation for their recovery and reintegration. The international scientific communityʼs emphasis on “risk assessment” procedures based on empirical methodologies and instruments has prompted organisations to seek new and more effective tools. This study explores the applicability of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) among Italian offenders. The Italian version of the LS/CMI’s Section 1 was administered to 74 Italian adults to conduct a preliminary evaluation of its psychometric properties. Results revealed significant differences compared to the North American normative sample, highlighting cultural variations among the “Central Eight” factors influencing risk assessment. Despite some inconsistencies across the eight subcomponents of the tool, the LS/CMI demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity with the Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R). Binary logistic regression showed that higher total LS/CMI scores were linked to a greater chance of recidivism, suggesting its predictive usefulness. These findings represent a first step towards validating the Italian LS/CMI, underscoring the importance of further longitudinal research to enhance the toolʼs reliability and contribute to efforts aimed at reducing recidivism in the Italian penal system.

References

  1. Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory – Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
  2. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19-52. DOI: 10.1177/0093854890017001004.
  3. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and / or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7-27. DOI: 10.1177/0011128705281756.
  4. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2004). Level of service/case management inventory: LS/CMI. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
  5. Bhutta, M. H., & Wormith, J. S. (2016). An examination of a risk/needs assessment instrument and its relation to religiosity and recidivism among probationers in a Muslim culture. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(2), 204-229. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815604011.
  6. Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2024). The psychology of criminal conduct, 7th edition. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003292128.
  7. Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2013). Applying the risk-need-responsivity principles to offender assessment. In L. A. Craig, L. Dixon, & T. A. Gannon (Eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 71-93). Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118320655.ch4.
  8. Bonta, J., Blais, J., Wilson, H.A. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 278-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014.
  9. Caretti V., Manzi, G., Schimmenti, A., & Seragusa, L. (2011). PCL-R Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised (2nd ed.). Firenze: O.S. Giunti.
  10. Castelletti, L., & Straticò, E. (2016). Dalla pericolosità sociale all’analisi del rischio di recidiva di reato per i soggetti con malattia mentale. Prospettiva storica e riflessi attuali in Italia. Rivista Sperimentale di Freniatria, (1). DOI: 10.3280/RSF2016-001009.
  11. Degenhardt, L., Bharat, C., Glantz, M. D., Sampson, N. A., Scott, K., Lim, C. C., ... & WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators. (2019). The epidemiology of drug use disorders cross-nationally: Findings from the WHO’s World Mental Health Surveys. International Journal of Drug Policy, 71, 103-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106128.
  12. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  13. Eisenberg, M. J., Van Horn, J. E., Dekker, J., Assink, M., Van Der Put, C. E., Hendricks, J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2019). Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: A metaanalysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 732-750. DOI: 10.1177/0093854819826109.
  14. Farrington, David P., Coid, Jeremy W. and Murray, J. (2009) Family factors in the intergenerational transmission of offending. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 19(2), 109-124. DOI: 10.1002/cbm.717.
  15. Fazel, S., Sariaslan, A. & Fanshawe, T. (2022). Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 28, 397-406. DOI: 10.1007/s10610-022-09520-y.
  16. Fazel, S., Yoon, I. A., & Hayes, A. J. (2017). Substance use disorders in prisoners: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis in recently incarcerated men and women. Addiction, 112(10), 1725-1739. DOI: 10.1111/add.13877.
  17. Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., & Schadee, H. (2007). Civic community and violent behavior in Italy. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33(1), 56-62. DOI: 10.1002/ab.20167.
  18. Giguere G, James, J. & Proulx, J. (2021). Validity of the LS/CMI for the Prediction of Recidivism among Male and Female Offenders. Journal of Crime and Criminal Behavior, 1(1), pp. 101-120.
  19. Gordon, H., Kelty, S. F., & Julian, R. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory among Australian offenders completing community-based sentences. Crimina Justice and Behavior, 42(11), 1089-1109. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815596419.
  20. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19-30. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19.
  21. Gualco, B., Ruocco, M., & Rensi, R. (2010). Struttura familiare e comportamenti devianti dei giovani in Italia: uno studio effettuato attraverso il metodo del self-report. Rassegna italiana di criminologia, (2), 255-281.
  22. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. North Tonawanda, New York: Multi-Health Systems.
  23. Hare, R. D. (2020). The PCL-R Assessment of Psychopathy. In: The Wiley International Handbook on Psychopathic Disorders and the Law (eds A.R. Felthous and H. Saß). DOI: 10.1002/9781119159322.ch4.
  24. Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral sciences & the law, 18(5), 623-645. DOI: 10.1002/10990798(200010)18:5%3C623::AID-BSL409%3E3.0.CO;2-W.
  25. Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1997). Psychopathy: Assessment and association with criminal conduct. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 22-35). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  26. Hawkins, J. D., Smith, B. H., Hill, K. G., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2003). Understanding and preventing crime and violence: Findings from the Seattle Social Development Project. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 255-312). New York: Kluwer Academic.
  27. Hollin, C. R., Palmer, E. J., & Clark, D. (2003). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised profile of English prisoners: A needs analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 422-440. DOI: 10.1177/0093854803253134.
  28. https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document-librarydocs/esl_infographic_final.pdf.
  29. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eac/education-and-training-monitor-2022/it/country-reports/italy.html.
  30. Leschied, A., Chiodo, D., Nowicki, E., & Rodger, S. (2008). Childhood predictors of adult criminality: A meta-analysis drawn from the prospective longitudinal literature. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50(4), 435-467.
  31. Lightfoot, L. O., & Hodgins, D. (1988). A Survey of Alcohol and Drug Problems in Incarcerated Offenders. International Journal of the Addictions, 23(7), 687-706. DOI: 10.3109/10826088809058834.
  32. Mundia, L., Matzin, R., Mahalle, S., Hamid, M. H., & Osman, R. S. (2016). Contributions of sociodemographic factors to criminal behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 9, 147-156. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S95270.
  33. Nicholls, T. L., Petersen, K. L., & Pritchard, M. M. (2016). Comparing preferences for actuarial versus structured professional judgment violence risk assessment measures across five continents: To what extent is practice keeping pace with science. International perspectives on violence risk assessment, 127-149. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.003.0008.
  34. Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2014). Thirty years of research on the level of service scales: a meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 156. DOI: 10.1037/a0035080.
  35. Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2007). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 971-984. DOI: 10.1177/0093854807300819.
  36. Payne, A.A., Welch, K. (2015). 15 How School and Education Impact the Development of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior. In: Morizot, J., Kazemian, L. (eds) The Development of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08720-7_15.
  37. Pieroni, L., & Lanari, D. (2018). The role of fathers in the criminal careers of juveniles in Italy. Journal of Demographic Economics, 84(4), 419-445.
  38. Piselli, M., Attademo, L., Garinella, R., Rella, A., Antinarelli, S., Tamantini, A., ... & Abram, K. M. (2015). Psychiatric needs of male prison inmates in Italy. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 82-88.
  39. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nonetti, R. Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7.
  40. Saita, E., Pagano, L. (2018). Là, dove i mari si toccano: la psicologia nel sistema di esecuzione della pena. Introduzione. Ricerche di psicologia, 41(3), 299-305.
  41. Saladino, V., Fusco, A., Castellani, L., Calaresi, D., & Verrastro, V. (2024). Aggressive behavior among Italian justice-involved juveniles: the impact of attachment, discipline, and moral disengagement. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2024.2303496.
  42. Scognamiglio, C., Sorge, A., Borrelli, G., Perrella, R., & Saita, E. (2024). Exploring the connection between childhood trauma, dissociation, and borderline personality disorder in forensic psychiatry: a comprehensive case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1332914.
  43. Sorge, A., Borrelli, G., Saita, E., Perrella, R. (2022). Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Case-Study of Filicide in an Italian Woman. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 6967. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19126967.
  44. Van Amsterdam, J., & Van den Brink, W. (2015). The Misuse of Prescription Opioids: A Threat for Europe? Current drug abuse reviews, 8(1), 3-14. DOI: 10.2174/187447370801150611184218.
  45. Vose, B. (2016). Risk assessment and reassessment: An evidence-based approach to offender management. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 301. DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12196.
  46. Wormith, J. S., & Bonta, J. (2020). Understanding and managing offender risk: A conversation with James Bonta. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(1), 80-98. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X19899717.
  47. Wormith, J. S., & Bonta, J. (2021). Risk/need assessment for adults and older adolescents: The level of service (LS) instruments. In K. S. Douglas & R. K. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (second edition, pp. 159-190). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9781315518374-11.
  48. Wormith, J., & Bonta, J. (2018). The level of service (LS) instruments. In J.P. Singh, D. G. Kroner, J. S. Wormith & S. L. Desmarais (Eds), Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools (first edition). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781119184256.ch6.
  49. Yukhnenko, D., Blackwood, N., & Fazel, S. (2020). Risk factors for recidivism in individuals receiving community sentences: a systematic review and metaanalysis. CNS spectrums, 25(2), 252-263. DOI: 10.1017/S1092852919001056.
  50. Zara, G. (2016). Valutare il rischio in ambito criminologico. Procedure e strumenti per l’assessment psicologico. Bologna: il Mulino.
  51. Zhang, J., & Liu, N. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LSIR with probationers. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 59(13), 1474-1486. DOI: 10.1177/0306624x14538396.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...