Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Studies and researches

No. 46 (2020)

Facing trauma to handle disability: Preliminary results of an intervention for parents

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/qpc46-2020oa10162
Submitted
luglio 20, 2020
Published
2020-07-20

Abstract

Families are really challenged by the communication of a disability of a child. They need to recreate a new balance to face a difficulty with such an overwhelming emotional impact.
The acceptance of the disability of one’s child is the result of a process that does not happen automatically. Parents of children with medium and severe disabilities experience high levels of stress and burden, with effects comparable to those of a traumatic event. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) allows the reorganization of memories in a functional and adaptive way according to the principles of Adaptive Information Processing reducing its emotional impact. EMDR promote an adaptive processing of the traumatic experience of receiving a disability diagnosis and negative prognosis of a child. We aimed at investigating the effectiveness of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing with this population with the Integrative Group Treatment Protocol (EMDR-IGTP). Thirty-nine
parents entered in the study. The treatment consisted of ten group sessions. Emotional distress, coping and post-traumatic growth were measured before the treatment, and three months post-intervention, using several clinical scales. Preliminary results show that parents increase scores in the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory at post-intervention. We will illustrate the intervention protocol and outcomes.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013), DSM-5. Manuale diagnostico e statistico dei disturbi mentali (trad. it.: Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2014).
  2. Balbo M. (2006). EMDR: uno strumento di dialogo fra le psicoterapie. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Bernstein E.M., Putnam F.W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12): 727-35. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004.
  4. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintrub J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2): 267-83.
  5. David D., Lynn S.J., Ellis A. (2010). Rational and irrational beliefs: research, theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Dondi A. (2008). Disabilità, Trauma familiare e resilienza. Il peso della normalità per fratelli e sorelle delle persone disabili. Quaderni di Psicologia, Analisi Transazionale e Scienze Umane, 49: 117-142.
  7. Ellis A. (1994). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A rational emotive behavioral theory. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 12(1): 3-25.
  8. Fabbri Bombi A., Bertin I., Cristante F., Colombo F. (1996). Un contributo alla standardizzazione della Dissociative Experience Scale (DES) di Bernstein e Putnam. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 219: 39-46.
  9. Felitti V. (2013) Adverse Childhood experiences (ACE) study. Rivista di Psicoterapia EMDR. EMDR Italia, 41.
  10. Fernandez G., Maslovaric M., Galvagni V. (2011). Traumi psicologici ferite dell’anima, il contributo della terapia con EMDR. Napoli: Liguori.
  11. Giannantonio M. (2005). Psicotraumatologia e psicologia dell’emergenza (2nd ed). Salerno: Ecomind.
  12. Horowitz M., Wilner N., Alvarez W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41: 209-218.
  13. Incerti A., Maslovaric G., Rossi F., Fernandez I. (2016). Caregiving parent group: affrontare il trauma per gestire la disabilità mediante un intervento basato su EMDR e CBT. Relazione presentata al Congresso SITCC 2016.
  14. Incerti A., Cimorelli F., Maslovaric G., Rossi F., Fernandez I. (2019). Facing Trauma to handle disability. Poster presentato al congresso Emdr Europe Cracovia 2019.
  15. Luber M. (a cura di) (2015). I protocolli terapeutici dell’EMDR. Roma: Giovanni Fioriti.
  16. Manetti M., Zanobini M., Usai M.C. (2002). La famiglia di fronte alla disabilità. Stress, risorse e sostegni. Trento: Erikson.
  17. March of Dimes (2000). Lives in the balance: 2000 annual report. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation.
  18. Moroni L., Sguazzin C., Filipponi L. (2008). Caregiver Need Assessment: uno strumento di analisi dei bisogni del caregiver. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 30(3): B84-B90.
  19. Pavone M. (a cura di) (2009) Famiglia e progetto di vita. Crescere un figlio disabile dalla nascita alla vita adulta. Trento: Erickson.
  20. Pontiggia G. (2000). Nati due volte. Milano: Oscar Mondadori.
  21. Prati G., Pietrantoni L. (2006). Crescita post-traumatica: Un’opportunità dopo il trauma? Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 12: 133-144.
  22. Quinn G. (2007a). Emergency EMDR-treating victims from man made to natural disasters. Articolo presentato all’England Ireland Conference, 23 marzo, Glasgow, Scotland.
  23. Quinn G. (2007b). Emergency EMDR-treating victims from man made to natural disasters. Articolo presentato al World Psychiatric Association Meeting, 18-21 Aprile, Seul Corea.
  24. Shapiro F. (2000). EMDR, desensibilizzazione e rielaborazione attraverso i movimenti oculari. Edizione italiana a cura di Isabel Fernandez. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  25. Shapiro F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  26. Shapiro F. (2006). New notes on adaptive information processing. Hamden, CT: EMDR Humanitarian Assistance Programs.
  27. Sorrentino A.M. (2006). Figli disabili. La famiglia di fronte all’handicap. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  28. Tedeschi R., Park C., Calhoun L. (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  29. Zanobini M., Manetti M., Usai C.M. (2002). La famiglia di fronte alla disabilità, stress, risorse e sostegni. Trento: Erickson.
  30. Walen S.R., DiGiuseppe R., Dryden W. (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rationalemotive therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  31. World Health Organization (2013). Guidelines for the management of conditions that are specifically related to stress. Geneva.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...