Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

No. 2 (2023)

The value of reflexivity in educational work, starting from the interweaving of gestures and professional knowledge

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/erp2-2023oa15893
Submitted
maggio 15, 2023
Published
2023-07-25

Abstract

Educational work is a deeply relational practice that, by its nature, unfolds in everyday life, assuming the complexity that distinguishes contemporary society as a horizon of reference. This implies the need to avoid standardized techniques or methods, in order to identify, in the actual circumstances, the way to support the subjects involved in a process of refinement and existential design. It is believed that for educators it is, therefore, fundamental to start a constant reflexivity in action and on action, evaluating their knowledge, their gestures, the posture taken and their communicative and relational mode.

The educational studies focused, in particular, on knowledge, language and speech, while the body stays in the background. The paper aims to move from an analysis of non-verbal communication, with reference to gestures and the value of gestures in the professional field. In the educational domain, reflexivity on gestures can lead to a cognitive gain on several fronts, by investigating the intent behind the professional action. The goal becomes, at the theoretical level, the delineation of training practices for a reflective learning in educational work.

References

  1. Alin, C. (2010). La Geste Formation. Gestes professionnels et Analyse des pratiques. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  2. Bateson, G. (1972). Verso un’ecologia della mente. Milano: Adelphi, 1983.
  3. Bateson, G. (1979). Mente e natura (tr. it. di G. Longo). Milano: Adelphi, 1984.
  4. Bucheton, D., & Dezutter, O. (Eds.) (2008). Le développement des gestes professionnels dans l’einseignement du français - Un défi pour la recherche et la formation. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
  5. Butson, R., & Thomson, C. (2011). Reflections on the Use of Autovideography in an Undergraduate Education Context. Journal of Research Practice, 7(2), pp. 1-11. Testo disponibile al sito: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952783.pdf (consultato in data 06.03.2023).
  6. Cadei, L. (2017). Quante storie! Narrare il lavoro educativo. Brescia: La Scuola.
  7. Cadei, L., & Ramsamy-Pratt, P. (2018). Tra rifugiati e educatori: la cura dei gesti. Educazione Interculturale. Ricerche. Pratiche, 16(2), pp. 85-97.
  8. Cadei, L., Simeone, D., Serrelli, E., & Abeni, L. (Eds.) (2022). L’altro educatore. Verso le competenze di secondo livello. Brescia: Scholé.
  9. de Certeau, M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.
  10. Dewey, J. (1933). Come pensiamo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina editore, 2019.
  11. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, pp. 353-374.
  12. Gamelli, I. (2005). Sensibili al corpo. I gesti della formazione e della cura. Roma: Meltemi.
  13. Gamelli I. (2012). Parlare del corpo, parlare dal corpo. Una riflessione in forma di premessa. In Id. (Ed.), Di che corpo parliamo? I saperi incorporati nell’educazione e nella cura (pp. 7-22). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Gevaert, J. (2010). Il problema dell’uomo. Introduzione all’antropologia filosofica. Torino: Elledici, 2010.
  15. Iori, V. (2018). Le professioni educative e la formazione pedagogica. In V. Iori (Ed.), Educatori e pedagogisti. Senso dell’agire educativo e riconoscimento professionale (pp. 15-38). Trento: Erickson.
  16. Jorro, A. (1998). L’inscription des gestes professionnels dans l’action. En question, 19, pp. 1-20. Testo disponibile al sito: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00112344/document (consultato in data 06.03.2023).
  17. Jorro, A. (1999). L’instance évaluative dans les pratiques professionnelles des enseignants. Questions de Recherche en Education, 1, pp. 251-257.
  18. Jorro, A. (2002). Professionnaliser le métier d’enseignant. Paris: ESF.
  19. Jorro, A. (2005). Réflexivité et auto-évaluation dans les pratiques enseignantes. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 27(2), pp. 33-47. Doi: 10.7202/1087976ar.
  20. Jorro, A. (2006). Postures professionnelles des conseillers en évolution professionnelle. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 32(3), pp. 1-15. Doi: 10.4000/ripes.1131.
  21. Jorro, A. (2016). Postures et gestes professionnels de formateurs dans l’accompagnement professionnel d’enseignants du premier degré. eJRIEPS [Online], 38. Doi: 10.4000/ejrieps.906.
  22. Kemmis, S. (2019). A practice sensibility: An invitation to the theory of practice architectures. Berlino: Springer.
  23. Kemmis, S. (2022). Transforming practice: Changing the world with the theory of practice architectures. Berlino: Springer.
  24. Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing Practices, Changing Education. Berlino: Springer.
  25. Kemmis, S., & Hopwood, N. (2022). Connective Enactment and Collective Accomplishment in Professional Practices. Professions and Professionalism, 12(3). Doi: 10.7577/pp.4780.
  26. Lameul, G. (2016). Postures et activité du sujet en formation: de l’intention au geste professionnel. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 32(3), pp. 1-8. Doi: 10.4000/ripes.1160.
  27. Lasswell, H.D. (1948). The structure and Function of Communication in Society. In Bryson, L., The Communication of Ideas (pp. 37-51). New York: Harper.
  28. Le Bellu S., Lahlou S., & Nosulenko V. (2010). Capter et transférer le savoir incor-poré dans un geste professionnel. Social Science Information, 49(3), pp. 371-413.
  29. Le Breton, D. (2006). Il sapore del mondo. Un’antropologia dei sensi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina editore, 2007.
  30. Leach, E. (1972). L’influenza del contesto culturale sulla comunicazione non ver-bale nell’uomo. In R.A. Hinde (Ed.), La comunicazione non verbale (pp. 419-457). Bari: Laterza, 1974.
  31. Leão, M. (2007). La présence totale au mouvement. Ivry sur Seine: Point d’Appui.
  32. Löwen, A. (1958). Il linguaggio del corpo. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1978.
  33. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  34. Morin, E. (2014). Insegnare a vivere. Manifesto per cambiare l’educazione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina editore, 2015.
  35. Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). I gesti. Origine e diffusione. Milano: Mondadori, 1983.
  36. Pati, L. (1984). Pedagogia della comunicazione educativa. Brescia: La Scuola.
  37. Pati, L. (2003). Dalla “pedagogia generale” alla “pedagogia sociale della famiglia”. In L. Pati (Ed.), Ricerca pedagogica ed educazione familiare: studi in onore di Norberto Galli (pp. 219-252). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  38. Pierce, C.S. (2014). Illustrations of the Logic of Sciences. Chicago: Open Court.
  39. Polany M., & Sen A. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  40. Ramsamy-Pratt P. (2019). Apprendre par le geste. Apprendre du geste. Consultori Familiari Oggi, 27(1), pp. 95-110.
  41. Schön, D.A. (1983). Il professionista riflessivo. Per una nuova epistemologia del-la pratica professionale. Bari: Dedalo, 1993.
  42. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois.
  43. Simeone, D. (2002). La consulenza educativa. Dimensione pedagogica della relazione di aiuto. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  44. Striano, M., Melacarne, C., & Oliverio, S. (2018). La riflessività in educazione. Prospettive, modelli, pratiche. Brescia: Scholè.
  45. Vermersch, P. (1994). L’Entretien d’explicitation en formation continue et initiale. Paris: ESF.
  46. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H., & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatica della comunicazione umana. Roma: Astrolabio, 1971.
  47. Zani, B., Selleri, P., & David, D. (1998). La comunicazione. Modelli teorici e contesti sociali. Roma: Carocci.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...