Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli

2022

Il lavoro non è una merce. Contenuto e significato del lavoro nel Ventunesimo secolo

  • Alain Supiot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2022-164001oa
Inviata
28 dicembre 2022
Pubblicato
11-01-2023

Abstract

In his valedictory lecture before the Collège de France, Alain Supiot reviews his work on the transformation of labour in the twenty-first century, highlighting the role of law and institutions in addressing the consequences of the digital revolution and environmental crisis. In his view, the moral, social and environmental bankruptcy of neoliberalism calls for us to reconsider the legal fiction of labour as a commodity and to re-establish the truly «humane labour regime» envisaged by the preamble to the ILO Constitution, recognizing both the meaning and content of work. He uses the case of scientific research to illustrate his argument.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Abbott E.A. (1984). Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. London: Seeley.
  2. Bots H., Waquet F. (1997). La République des Lettres. Paris/Brussels: Belin/De Boeck.
  3. Cadbury Report (1992). The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Lon-don: Professional Publishing Ltd.
  4. Castoriadis C. (1991 [2005]). Une société à la dérive. Entretiens et débats (1974-1997). Paris: Seuil 131.
  5. Chenavier R. (2019). De Simone Weil à André Gorz: travail ou non-travail ?. In: Supiot A., a cura di, Mondialisation ou globalisation? Les leçons de Simone Weil. Paris: Éditions du Collège de France.
  6. Chesterton G.K. (1925). The Everlasting Man. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  7. Clot Y. (2019). Le travail: un objet politique sans sujet?. In: Supiot A., a cura di, Mondialisation ou globalisation? Les leçons de Simone Weil. Paris: Éditions du Collège de France.
  8. Coase R. (1974). The Economics of the First Amendment: The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas. American Economic Review, 64(2): 384-391.
  9. de Leonardis O. (2008). Nuovi conflitti a Flatlandia. In: Grossi G., a cura di, I con-flitti contemporanei. Contrasti, scontri e confronti nelle società del III millen-nio. Torino: Utet.
  10. Debruyne N.L. (2017). Uber Drivers: A Disputed Employment Relationship in Light of the Sharing Economy. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 92(1): 289-315.
  11. Dufour D.R. (1990). Les mystères de la trinité. Paris: Gallimard.
  12. Durkheim É. (1969). Leçons de sociologie. (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  13. Fabre-Magnan M. (2019). Droit des obligations. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  14. Ferric C., Fang R., Steen G. e Casadevall A. (2012). Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific. Publications Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109(42): 17028-17033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
  15. Friedrich A., Hayek F.A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Gardies J.L. (1987). L’erreur de Hume. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  17. Gary S., Becker G.S. (1964 [1994]). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Godlee F. (2010). Conflicts of Interest and Pandemic Flu: WHO Must Act Now to Restore Its Credibility, and Europe Should Legislate. British Medical Journal, 340(2947): 1256-1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2947
  19. Hahn R. (1971). The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. Hansmann H., Kraakman R. (2000). The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2): 439-468.
  21. Haudricourt A.G. (1962). Domestication des animaux, culture des plantes et trai-tement d’autrui. L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie, 2(1): 40-50.
  22. Hauriou M. (1925[1933]). Aux sources du droit: le pouvoir, l'ordre et la liberté. Paris: Bloud & Gay.
  23. Hénaff M. (2002). Le prix de la vérité. Le don, l’argent, la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.
  24. Hokusai K. (1988). One Hundred Views of Mt. Fuji. New York: George Braziller.
  25. Hughes O.E. (1994). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Kafka F. (1924 [1948]). The Penal Colony. New York: Schocken Books (trad. Wil-la Muir and Edwin Muir)
  27. Kafka F. (1931[2002]). The Metamorphosis and Other Writings. New York: Con-tinuum. Ed. Helmuth Kiesel (trad. Edwin Muir and Willa Muir).
  28. Kantorowicz E.H. (1961). Kingship under the Impact of Scientific Jurisprudence. In: Clagett M., Clagett M., Post G. e Reynolds R., a cura di, Twelfth-Century Europe and the Foundations of Modern Society. Madison: University of Wis-consin Press.
  29. Kessler D. (2007). Adieu 1945, raccrochons notre pays au monde!. Challenges.fr, 4 October 2007, testo disponibile al sito: https://www.challenges.fr/magazine/adieu-1945-raccrochons-notre-pays-au-monde-l-editorialiste_338714
  30. Kojève A. (1982). Esquisse d’une phénoménologie du droit. Paris: Gallimard.
  31. Kott S. (2018). L’OIT en tension: entre travail humain et productivisme. In: Musso P. e Supiot A., a cura di, Qu’est-ce qu’un régime de travail réellement humain?. Paris: Hermann.
  32. Le Goff J. (1985[1957]). Les intellectuels au Moyen Âge. Paris: Seuil.
  33. Leroi-Gourhan A. (1993). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge: MIT Press (trad. Anna Bostock Berger).
  34. Lévy J.P. (1939). La hiérarchie des preuves dans le droit savant du Moyen Âge depuis la renaissance du droit romain jusqu’à la fin du xiv e siècle. Paris: Si-rey.
  35. Lévy-Bruhl H. (1964). La preuve judiciaire. Étude de sociologie juridique. Paris: Marcel Rivière & Cie.
  36. Longo G. (2014). Science, Problem Solving and Bibliometrics. In: Blockmans W., Engwall L. e Weaire D., a cura di, Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance. London: Portland Press.
  37. Lyon-Caen G. (1967). The Publishing of the Text of Professors’ Courses of Lec-tures. Revue internationale du droit d’auteur, 52: 136-175.
  38. Matthew W., Finkin M.W. (2017). L’arbitrage aux États-Unis, une véritable histoire d’amour. Droit social, 2: 128-135.
  39. Mayali L., a cura di (2002). Le Façonnage juridique du marché des religions aux États-Unis. Paris: Mille et une nuits.
  40. McWatters C.S., Lemarchand Y. (2006). Accounting Representation and the Slave Trade: The Guide du Commerce of Gaignat de l’Aulnais. Accounting Histori-ans Journal, 33(2): 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.33.2.1
  41. Méda D. (2018). Simone Weil et Hannah Arendt, deux philosophes du travail post-modernes. In: Musso P. e Supiot A., a cura di, Qu’est-ce qu’un régime de tra-vail réellement humain?. Paris: Hermann.
  42. Merton R.K. (1967 [1942]). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  43. Morck R.K., a cura di (2007). A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago: Universi-ty of Chicago Press.
  44. Notat N., Sénard J.D. (2018). L’Entreprise, objet d’intérêt collectif. Report to the Ministers of Ecological Transition and Solidarity, Justice, Economy and Fi-nance, and Labour.
  45. Nowotny H., Pestre D., Schmidt-Aßmann E., Schulze-Fielitz H. e Trute H.H. (2005). The Public Nature of Science under Assault: Politics, Markets, Science and the Law. Berlin: Springer.
  46. OECD (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD.
  47. Polanyi K. (1944 [2001]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
  48. Post G., Giocarinis K. e Kay R. (1955). The Medieval Heritage of a Humanistic Ideal: Scientia donum Dei est, unde vendi non potest. Traditio, 11: 196-234. DOI: 10.1017/S0362152900006358
  49. Rigaudiat J. (2018). La dette, arme de dissuasion sociale massive. Vulaines-sur-Seine: Éditions.
  50. Robé J.P. (2009). À qui appartiennent les entreprises?. Le débat, 3: 32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/deba.155.0032
  51. Schwartz Y. (1997). Reconnaissances du travail: pour une approche ergologique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  52. Sewell W.H. (1980). Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Shapin S. (1994). A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  54. Simondon G. (1958 [2012]). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
  55. Stalin J.V. (1978). Address to the Graduates from the Red Army Academies. De-livered in the Kremlin, May 4, 1935. Works, 14: 1934-1940.
  56. Stokes A.M. (2017). Driving Courts Crazy: A Look at How Labor and Employ-ment Laws Do Not Coincide with Ride Platforms in the Sharing Economy. Ne-braska Law Review, 95(3): 853-884.
  57. Supiot A. (1991). Sur l’ouverture de l’Université. In: Babinet F. e David M., a cura di, Convergences. Études offertes à Marcel David. Quimper: Calligrammes.
  58. Supiot A. (2013). Ontologie et déontologie de la doctrine. Recueil Dalloz, 21: 1421-1428.
  59. Supiot A. (2017). Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Alle-giance. Oxford: Hart.
  60. Supiot A. (2018). Democracy Laid Low by the Market. Jurisprudence, 9(3): 449-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2018.1545734
  61. Supiot A., a cura di (2001). Beyond Employment: Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  62. Supiot A., a cura di (2015). L’Entreprise dans un monde sans frontières: perspec-tives économiques et juridiques. Paris: Dalloz.
  63. Supiot A., a cura di (2018). Face à l’irresponsabilité: la dynamique de la solidari-té. Paris: Collège de France.
  64. Supiot A., Delmas-Marty M., a cura di (2015). Prendre la responsabilité au sé-rieux. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  65. Vacarie I. (2019). Repenser la condition juridique des travailleurs dans une éco-nomie « disruptive ». In: Supiot A., a cura di, Mondialisation ou globalisa-tion? Les leçons de Simone Weil. Paris: Éditions du Collège de France.
  66. Verger J. (1999). Culture, enseignement et société en Occident aux xii e et xiii e siècles. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
  67. Volle M. (2018). De la main-d’oeuvre au cerveau d’œuvre. In: Musso P. e Supiot A., a cura di, Qu’est-ce qu’un régime de travail réellement humain?. Paris: Hermann.
  68. Waquet F. (2003). Parler comme un livre. L’oralité et le savoir (xvi e–xx e siècle), Paris: Albin Michel.
  69. Waquet F. (2010). Respublica academica: rituels universitaires et genres du sa-voir (xvii e–xxi e siècle). Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris Sorbonne.
  70. World Bank (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Washington: World Bank Group.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...