Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articoli

Latest Articles

The crucial knots of psychological practice between theory and action: Demand analysis as a transformative device

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2025oa22609
Submitted
aprile 20, 2026
Published
2026-08-03

Abstract

This paper presents a case study on the analysis of psychological demand conducted within a training and support intervention requested by a regional office of the Italian Penitentiary Administration for its personnel. The six-month project involved six managerial figures and eight operators through individual semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Text analysis, carried out using the T-LAB software and based on the collusive processes model, identified six thematic clusters related to organizational issues (fragmentation, inconsistency) and relational resources (peer support). The intervention activated a space for intersubjective reflection and enabled a reformulation of the initial request as an opportunity for shared meaning-making, fostering the development of a change-oriented planning process.

References

  1. April, K., Dharani, B., & April, A. (2023). Lived experiences of exclusion in the workplace: Psychological & behavioural effects. Emerald Publishing Limited. Doi: 10.1108/S2051-233320230000007011.
  2. Carli, R. (2016). Theoretical foundations of clinical psychological intervention. Quaderni della Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1, 4-15. Retrieved from http://www.rivistadipsicologiaclinica.it/quaderni.
  3. Carli, R. (2020). Psicosociologia e psicoanalisi: Tracce per la storia di un movimento internazionale e per l’analisi delle sue vicende italiane. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 15(1), 47-68. doi: 10.14645/RPC.2020.1.791.
  4. Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. M. (2003). Analisi della domanda: Teoria e intervento in psicologia clinica. il Mulino.
  5. Cigoli, V. (2001). Temi e problemi di ricerca relazionale. Rivista di psicoterapia relazionale, 14, 1000-1003. http://hdl.handle.net/10807/24529.
  6. Cigoli, V. (2006). L’albero della discendenza. Clinica dei corpi familiari. FrancoAngeli.
  7. Consiglio Nazionale dell’Ordine degli Psicologi (2020, 20 giugno). Atti tipici e riservati della professione psicologica: la competenza del counseling. [Docu-mento ufficiale]. Retrieved from https://www.psy.it/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/10/Documento-atti-tipici-e-riservati-CNOP-20-giugno-2020-1.pdf.
  8. Forti, D., & Natili, F. (2014). Luigi Pagliarani: Saggi scelti. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  9. Gennari, M. L., Molgora, S., Pirovano, N., & Saita, E. (2015). La costruzione della domanda psicologica attraverso il colloquio clinico: I fondamenti, il metodo, i contesti (p. 206). Franco Angeli. http://hdl.handle.net/10807/67889.
  10. Gennari, M. L., Molgora, S., & Saita, E. (2022). Introduzione. Tra sogno e professionalità. In Analisi di casi attraverso i primi colloqui psicologici (pp. 7-11). Vita e Pensiero.
  11. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266.
  12. Jaques, E. (1970). Work, creativity, and social justice. Heinemann Educational.
  13. Kagan, C., Burton, M., & Siddiquee, A. (2008). Action research. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 32-53). London: SAGE Publications.
  14. Kaneklin, C., & Galuppo, L. (2009). La sostenibilità della vita lavorativa come co-strutto e come processo: Una ricerca sul campo. Risorsa Uomo, 16(2), 183-199.
  15. Lancia, F. (2004). Strumenti per l’analisi dei testi: Introduzione all’uso di T-LAB. FrancoAngeli.
  16. Oreg, S., & Sverdlik, N. (2011). Ambivalence toward imposed change: The conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 337-349. Doi: 10.1037/a0021100.
  17. Vakola, M., & Petrou, P. (Eds.). (2018). Organizational change: Psychological effects and strategies for coping. Routledge.
  18. Rubat du Mérac, E. (2022). Studio di caso e focus group. In G. Domenici, P. Lucisano, & V. Biasi (a cura di), Ricerca sperimentale e processi valutativi in educazione (pp. 233-258). McGraw-Hill Education.
  19. Saita, E. (2018). Penitentiary institutions: transforming processes and Well-Being. World Futures, 74(6), 355-359. Doi: 10.1080/02604027.2018.1445692.
  20. Saita, E., & Tramontano, M. (2018). Navigating the complexity of the therapeutic and clinical use of photography in psychosocial settings: A review of the literature. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 21(1), 293. Doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2018.293.
  21. Savaresi, S. M., & Boley, D. L. (2004). A comparative analysis on the bisecting K-means and the PDDP clustering algorithms. Intelligent Data Analysis, 8(4), 345-362. Doi: 10.3233/IDA-2004-8403.
  22. Scaratti, G., Kaneklin, C., Ripamonti, S., & Gorli, M. (2009). Nuove prospettive della ricerca-azione. Ricerche di Psicologia, 3-4, 67-91. Doi: 10.3280/RIP2009-003004.
  23. Sorge, A., De Luca, L., Tamanza, G., & Saita, E. (2021). Ward staff as a tool to pro-mote wellbeing among prison employees. Sustainability, 13(18), 10392. Doi: 10.3390/su131810392.
  24. Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (2000). A comparison of document clustering techniques. KDD Workshop on Text Mining, 400(1), 525-526. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/215421.
  25. Venuleo, C. (2022). Contesti di vulnerabilità e domanda di senso: Riflessioni sulle sfide sociali della psicologia clinica. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 16(2), 76-88. https://quadernidipsicologiaclinica.com/index.php/rpc-archivio/article/view/1397.