Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

Articoli

No. 2 (2024)

Using virtual reality to support L2 learning in students with dyslexia: A proposal for an educational intervention

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2024oa18585
Submitted
ottobre 1, 2024
Published
2024-11-15

Abstract

This contribute presents some data from the research project INCLUDI (www.includi.eu), aimed at the planning and implementation of new teaching methods for supporting English learning in secondary-school students with diagnosis of dyslexia. Beyond practical and creative activities to be realized during the English class, the use of Virtual Reality (VR) was proposed to consolidate lexical, semantic, grammatical, and syntactical knowledge in English, by using interactive exercises, specifically developed to support learning processes according to the typical cognitive functioning of the students with dyslexia, such as described by the MIND (Materiality, Interconnectivity, Narrativity, Dynamics) model (Eide & Eide, 2011). This work presents the results on the effects of VR on the attitude and the self-efficacy towards English learning of 84 secondary-school students. Results show that using VR can support students’ engagement in English learning, in particular when they received a diagnosis of dyslexia.

References

  1. Andreoletti, C., & Lombardi, E. (2021). Kit progetto INCLUDI. Proposte per una didattica inclusiva della lingua inglese nella Scuola Secondaria. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola.
  2. Balboni, P. E. (2011). Conoscenza, verità, etica nell’educazione linguistica. Perugia: Guerra.
  3. Balboni, P. E. (2014). Etica nell’approccio, nel metodo, nelle azioni dell’educazione linguistica. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 1, 1-14. DOI: 10.21283/2376905X.1.11.
  4. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney, & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-76). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsycho- logia.2009.10.029.
  6. Cho, J., Jung, T., Macleod, K., & Swenson, A. (2021). Using virtual reality as a form of simulation in the context of legal education. In M. C. tom Dieck, T. H. Jung, & S. M. C. Loureiro, Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality (pp. 141-154), Progress in IS. Edinburgh: Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68086-2_11.
  7. Cornoldi, C., Orsini, A., Cianci, L., Giofrè, D., & Pezzuti, L. (2013). Intelligence and working memory control: Evidence from the WISC-IV administration to Italian children. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.005.
  8. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222-251. DOI: 10.3102/00346543049002222.
  9. Daloiso, M. (2012a). Lingue straniere e dislessia evolutiva: Teoria e metodologia per una glottodidattica accessibile. Torino: UTET Università.
  10. Daloiso, M. (2013). Riflessioni sul raggio d’azione della glottodidattica speciale. Una proposta di definizione e classificazione dei ‘Bisogni linguistici specifici, Educazione Linguistica. Language Education (EL.LE), 2, 635-649.
  11. Dekker, T., & Lisi, M. (2020). Sensory development: integration before calibration. Current Biology, 30, R409-R412. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.060.
  12. Eide, B. L., & Eide, F. F. (2011). The dyslexic advantage: Unlocking the hidden potential of the dyslexic brain. New York: Hudson Street Press.
  13. Elman, J. L. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on develop- ment (Vol. 10). Boston: MIT press.
  14. Gallese, V. (2006). Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. In G. Bock, & J. Goode, Empathy and Fairness: Novartis Foundation Symposium 278 (pp. 3-19). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9780470030585.ch2.
  15. Giofrè, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2015). The structure of intelligence in children with specific learning disabilities is different as compared to typically development children. Intelligence, 52, 36-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.002.
  16. Lieven, E., e Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson, & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 178-206). New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203938560.
  17. Liuzza, M. T., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2011). Do not resonate with actions: sentence polarity modulates cortico-spinal excitability during action-related sentence reading. PloS one, 6(2), e16855. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016855.
  18. Lombardi, E., & Andreoletti, C. (in preparazione). Io studio inglese.
  19. MacWhinney, B. (2008). A Unified Model. In N. C. Ellis, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 341- 372). New York: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Magenes, S., Monti, F., Cancer, A., Curti, S., Antonietti, A., & Traficante, D. (2021). Rappresentazione di sé e del futuro e impegno scolastico in bambini e adolescenti con disturbo specifico dell’apprendimento. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 25, 493-506. DOI: 10.1449/100600.
  21. Magenes, S., Cancer, A., Curti, S., Pradella, C., & Antonietti, A. (2022). Learning skills, creativity, and self-efficacy in vocational school students. Learning and Motivation, 79, 101829, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101829.
  22. Mameli, C., & Passini, S. (2017). Measuring four-dimensional engagement in school: a validation of the student engagement scale and of the agentic engagement scale. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24, 527-602.
  23. Mulders, M., Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2020). A framework for the use of immersive virtual reality in learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15, 208-224. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v15i24.16615.
  24. Palladino, P. (2018). English is fun! Programma per la valutazione degli atteggiamenti e delle abilità nell’apprendimento della lingua inglese. Trento: Erickson.
  25. Philippe, S., Souchet, A. D., Lameras, P., Petridis, P., Caporal, J., Coldeboeuf, G., & Duzan, H. (2020). Multimodal teaching, learning and training in Virtual Reality: A review and case study. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2, 421-442. DOI: 10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.008.
  26. Raven, J. (1954). Standard Progressive Matrices, It. Ad. SPM, Firenze: Giunti Psychometrics, 2008.
  27. Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2, 27-49. DOI: 10.1207/s15473341lld0201_2.
  28. Su, R., Tay, L., Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology. Health and Well-being, 6, 251-79. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12027.
  29. Tallal, P. (1984). Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia? That is the question. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 167-169. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400004963.
  30. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  31. Zhao, X., & Li, P. (2013). Simulating cross-language priming with a dynamic computational model of the lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 288-303. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728912000624.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...