Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

Articoli

No. 4 (2022): Is it time to change the paradigm to address neural development disorders? From research to clinical practice

“No Theory, No Party”: Without theory, there is no change

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa15628
Submitted
marzo 16, 2023
Published
2023-03-21

Abstract

The “transdiagnostic” approach to neurodevelopmental disorders can foster research and communication, but lacks theory. Without a theoretical model, identifying the causes of cognitive and behavioral disorders beyond their description and categorization is impossible. A first step towards change is to overcome the methodological distinction between developmental neuropsychology and adult neuropsychology.

References

  1. Antonietti, A., Borgatti, R., & Giorgetti, M. (2022). Cambiare paradigma per i disturbi del neurosviluppo? Dalla ricerca alla pratica clinica. Ricerche di Psicologia, 45, 1-12. doi: 10.3280/rip2022oa14921.
  2. Astle, D. E., Holmes, J., Kievit, R., & Gathercole, S. E. (2022). Annual Research Review: The transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 397-417.
  3. Balboni, G., & Cubelli, R. (2011). How to use psychological tests for functional diagnosis: The case of assessment of learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, Volume 24: Assessment and intervention (pp. 79-92). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  4. Caramazza, A., & McCloskey, M. (1988). The case for single-patient studies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 517-527.
  5. Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126.
  6. Friedmann, N., & Coltheart, M. (2018). Types of developmental dyslexia. In A. Bar-On, & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistics perspectives (pp. 721-752). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  7. Hyman, S.E. (2007). Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V?. Nature Review Neuroscience, 8, 725-732.
  8. Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748-751.
  9. Jaffee, S. R. (2022). Editorial: The times they are a-changin’: Paradigm shifts in child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 357-359.
  10. Kushki, A., Anagnostou, E., Hammill, C. Duez, P., Brian, J., Iaboni, A., Schachar, R., Crosbie, J., Arnold, P., & Lerch, J. P. (2019). Examining overlap and homogeneity in ASD, ADHD, and OCD: A data-driven, diagnosis-agnostic approach. Translational Psychiatry, 9, 318.
  11. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.
  12. Stevens, E., Dixon, D.R., Novack, M. N., Granpeesheh, D., Smith, T., & Linstead, E. (2019). Identification and analysis of behavioral phenotypes in autism spectrum disorder via unsupervised machine learning. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 129, 29-36.
  13. Volterra, V. (2010). Neuropsicologia e sviluppo. In S. Vicari & M.C. Caselli (Eds.), Neuropsicologia dello sviluppo (pp. 11-19). Bologna: il Mulino.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...