Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

Articoli

No. 4 (2022): Is it time to change the paradigm to address neural development disorders? From research to clinical practice

From categories to dimensions: Some considerations, waiting for a new paradigm

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa15608
Submitted
marzo 13, 2023
Published
2023-03-20

Abstract

This contribution offers a brief overview about the development of the nosology of the mental diseases proposed by the DSM system, taking into consideration the epistemological background of such evolution. The aim of this overview is to understand whether a change in the scientific paradigm is actually taking place, as Antonietti, Borgatti and Giorgetti’s (2022) paper suggests. RDoC (2009) and Human Connectome (2011) projects, supported by NHI, are proposing alternative ways to carry out a diagnostic process in the case of mental diseases and, in particular, in the case of neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the thesis of this contribution is that, so far, these new perspectives cannot be considered valid substitutions of the DSM/ICD systems yet. Hence, for the moment, it seems wise to keep teaching and using diagnostic categories listed in manuals, as they play a relevant role in the communication of the diagnosis and provide normative means to support the person with special needs and his/her family. The awareness of the drawbacks of such categories, though, currently suggests applying and promoting an assessment procedure aimed to get the representation of the whole functioning profile of the person according to a transdiagnostic and multidimensional perspective. Such integration of categories and dimensions is expected to offer the best way to plan interventions to support adaptive behavior and wellbeing in people with special needs.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1952). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1968). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Second Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  5. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  6. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  7. Antonietti, A., Borgatti, R., & Giorgetti, M. (2022). Cambiare paradigma per i disturbi del neurosviluppo? Dalla ricerca alla pratica clinica. Ricerche di Psicologia, 45, 1-12. DOI: 10.3280/rip2022oa14921.
  8. Aragona, M. (2006). Aspettando la rivoluzione. Oltre il DSM-V: Le nuove idee sulla diagnosi tra filosofia della scienza e psicopatologia. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
  9. Aragona, M. (2009). About and beyond comorbidity: does the crisis of the DSM bring on a radical rethinking of descriptive psychopathology?. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 29-33. DOI: 10.1353/ppp.0.0214.
  10. Aragona, M. (2015). Rethinking received views on the history of psychiatric nosology: Minor shifts, major continuities. In P. Zachar, D. S. Stoyanov, M. Aragona & A. Jablensky (Eds.), Alternative perspectives on psychiatric classification (pp. 27-46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Astle, D. E., Holmes, J., Kievit, R., & Gathercole, S. E. (2022). The transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 397-417. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13481.
  12. Auerbach, R.P., Pagliaccio, D., Hubbard, N. A., Frosch, I., Kremens, R., Cosby, E., ... & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2022). Reward related circuitry in depressed and anxious adolescents: A human connectome project. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61, 308-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.04.014.
  13. Fischer, B. A. (2012). A review of American psychiatry through its diagnoses: the history and development of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 200, 1022-1030. DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e318275cf19.
  14. Fletcher-Watson, S. (2022). Transdiagnostic research and the neurodiversity paradigm: commentary on the transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders by Astle et al. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 418-420. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13589.
  15. Haier, R. J. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155-179.
  17. Kawa, S., and Giordano, J. (2012). A brief historicity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 7, 2. DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-7-2.
  18. Kendell, R. E. (2002). Five criteria for an improved taxonomy of mental disorders. In J. E. Helzer & J. J. Hudziak (Eds.), Defining psychopathology in the 21st century. DSM-V and beyond (pp. 3-17). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  19. Kendell, R. E., and Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4-12. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4.
  20. Khun, T.S. (1991). The road since structure. In A. Fine, M. Forbes, & L. Wessels (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (Vol. II, pp. 3-13). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
  21. Kupfer, D. J., First, M. B., & Regier, D. A. (2002). Introduction. In D. J. Kupfer, M. B. First, & D. A. Regier (eds), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. xv–xxiii). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  22. Lombardi, E., Traficante, D., Bettoni, R., Offredi, I., Vernice, M. & Sarti, D. (2021). Comparison on well-being, engagement and perceived school climate in secondary school students with learning difficulties and specific learning disorders: An exploratory study. Behavioral Science, 11, 103. DOI: 10.3390/bs11070103.
  23. Maitland, C.A., Rhodes, S., O’Hare, A., & Stewart, M.E. (2021). Social identities and mental well-being in autistic adults. Autism, 25, 1771-1783. DOI: 10.1177/13623613211004328.
  24. Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 983-986. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.126.7.983.
  25. Schneider, J.W., & McGrew, K.S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In P.D. Flanagan & P.L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Third edition (pp. 99-144). New York: Guilford Press.
  26. Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2022). Linea guida sulla gestione dei Disturbi Specifici dell’Apprendimento. https://snlg.iss.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/LG-389-AIP_DSA.pdf.
  27. Zachar, P., & Jablensky, A. (2015). Introduction: The concept of validity in psychiatry and psychology. In P. Zachar, D. S. Stoyanov, M. Aragona & A. Jablensky (Eds.), Alternative perspectives on psychiatric classification (pp. 3-24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. World Health Assembly, 19 (1966). Eighth revision of the International Classification of Diseases. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/89390.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...