Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articoli

No. 4 (2022): Is it time to change the paradigm to address neural development disorders? From research to clinical practice

The progressive redrafting of the use of diagnostic categories in neurodevelopment disorders: Some reflections starting with the intervention of Antonietti, Borgatti, and Giorgetti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa15606
Submitted
marzo 13, 2023
Published
2023-03-20

Abstract

In response to the target article “A paradigm shift for neurodevelopmental disorders? From research to clinical practice” we wrote a contribution on the dimensional versus categorical approach. The article develops reflections both on a methodological and research level and on a clinical level.

References

  1. American Psychology Association, DSM-5 Task Force (2013). DSM-5: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5t h Edition. Washington, C.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Ammaniti, M., Cornoldi, C., & Vicari, S. (2015). Novità nell’approccio alla psicopatologia dello sviluppo nel DSM-5. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 19, 297-299.
  3. Antonietti, A., Borgatti, R., & Giorgetti, M. (2022). Cambiare paradigma per i disturbi del neurosviluppo? Dalla ricerca alla pratica clinica. Ricerche di Psicologia, 45, 1-12. DOI: 10.3280/rip2022oa14921.
  4. Astle, D. E., Holmes, J., Kievit, R., & Gathercole, S. E. (2022). The transdiagnostic revolution in neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 397-417.
  5. Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., Antonello, A., Di Criscienzo, L. & Toffalini, E. (2022). Inferring the Performance of Children with Dyslexia from that of the General Population: The Case of Associative Phonological Working Memory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26, 47-60. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2021.1897596.
  6. Carretti, B., & Re, A.M. (2014). Alcuni commenti sulle linee-guida: implicazioni per il trattamento. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 18, 99-103.
  7. Celi, F. (2017). Talvolta i fiumi straripano. Trento: Erickson.
  8. Cornoldi, C. (a cura di) (2019). I disturbi dell’apprendimento. Bologna: il Mulino.
  9. Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012). Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine, 42, 5, 903-920. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291711001966.
  10. Levy, F., Hay, D.A., Mcstephen, M., Wood, C., & Waldman, I. (1997). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A category or a continuum? Genetic analysis of a large-scale twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 6, 737-744. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199706000-00009.
  11. Mammarella, I.C., Toffalini, E., Caviola, S., Colling, & L., Szűcs, D. (2021). No evidence for a core deficit in developmental dyscalculia or mathematical learning disabilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62, 704-714. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13397.
  12. McGrath, L., Peterson, R., & Pennington, B. (2020). The multiple deficit model: Progress, problems, and prospects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24, 7-13. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2019.1706180.
  13. Peters, L., & Ansari, D. (2019). Are specific learning disorders truly specific, and are they disorders?. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 17, 100115. DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2019.100115.
  14. Tein, J.-Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 640-657. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2013.824781.
  15. Toffalini, E., Girardi, P., Giofrè, D., Altoè, G. (2022). Entia non sunt multiplicanda … Shall I look for clusters in my cognitive data?. PLoS ONE, 17, 6, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269584.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...