Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

Articoli

No. 2 (2022)

Conspiracy theories, radicalization and quest for significance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa14613
Submitted
settembre 19, 2022
Published
2022-09-21

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has represented and continues to represent a moment of crisis for many societies worldwide. During times of emergency like this, conspiracy theories spread very quickly as they provide simple explanations to complex events giving the illusion of being in control of an unknown and often frightening reality. Recently there has been an increase in the spread, especially online, of conspiracy theories connected both to the Covid-19 pandemic and to other social events. However, the spread of conspiracy theories can have very serious social consequences such as favoring the flourishing of forms of radicalization. In the present cross-sectional research conducted in Italy (N = 197) we used the Significance Quest Theory (SQT; Kruglanski et al., 2017) to describe how radicalization is connected to the quest for significance that can lead people to embrace a conspiracy mentality which in turn can support radicalized cognitions and behaviors. The results of this study reveal that the relationships between quest for significance and the tendency to radicalization and forms of prejudice towards immigrants, are partly explained by conspiracy thinking. The theoretical-practical implications of this research take into consideration the developments of SQT applied to the understanding of conspiracy thinking and the prefiguration of educational actions to be designed in a transformative perspective. 

References

  1. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637-647.
  2. Amiraux, V., & Fabbri, L. (2020). Apprendere a vivere in una società multietnica. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 5-17.
  3. Antonelli, F. (2021). Radicalizzazione. Milano: Mondadori.
  4. Bailey, G. M., & Edwards, P. (2017). Rethinking ‘radicalisation’: Microradicalisations and reciprocal radicalisation as an intertwined process. Journal for Deradicalization, (10), 255-281.
  5. Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of prejudice, 41(1), 45-60.
  6. Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S., Kabir, N., & Li, M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, 100-119.
  7. Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Devidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10, Doi:10.1371/journal.Pone.0118093.
  8. Biddlestone, M., Cichocka, A., Žeželj, I., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Conspiracy theories and intergroup relations. In Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 219-230). Routledge.
  9. Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Gundersen, A. B. (2022). The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 prevention: A meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46,101346, Doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346.
  10. Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Pich, O. (2020). Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Applied
  11. Psychology: Health and Well- Being, 12(4), 1270-1285.
  12. Bilewicz, M., & Sedek, G. (2015). Conspiracy stereotypes. The psychology of conspiracy, 1-22.
  13. Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), pp. 691-710.
  14. Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Basingstoke UK: Palgrave MacMillan. Doi: 10.1057/9780230349216.
  15. Byington, B. (2019). Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories and Violent Extremism on the Far Right: A Public Health Approach to Counter-Radicalization. Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism, 2(1), 1-18.
  16. Caramellino, D., Melacarne, C., Ducol, B. (2021). Transformative Learning and Micro-radicalization. In Nicolaides, A., Eschenbacher, S., Buergelt, P., Gilpin-Jackson, Y., Welch, M., Misawa, M. (Eds.), Handbook of learning of transformation, pp. 1-54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Chan, H. W., Chiu, C. P. Y., Zuo, S., Wang, X., Liu, L., & Hong, Y. Y. (2021). Not-so-straightforward links between believing in COVID-19-related conspiracy theories and engaging in disease-preventive behaviours. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-10.
  18. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & De Zavala, A. G. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157-166.
  19. Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9).
  20. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  21. Cosentino, G. (2020). Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
  22. Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2010). Violent radicalization in Europe: What we know and what we do not know. Studies in conflict & terrorism, 33(9), 797-814.
  23. Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Van Den Bos, K. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586-604.
  24. Douglas, K. M. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275.
  25. Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35.
  26. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current directions in psychological science, 26(6), 538-542.
  27. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M. J. (2015). The social, political, environmental, and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories. The psychology of conspiracy, 56, 183-200.
  28. Fabbri, L., Romano, A. (2017). Metodi per l’apprendimento trasformativo. Roma: Carocci.
  29. Geeraerts, S. B. (2012). Digital radicalization of youth. Social Cosmos, 3(1), 25-32.
  30. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political psychology, 15(4), 731-742.
  31. Goreis, A., & Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1-13.
  32. Greenberg, J., & Arndt, J. (2011). Terror management theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 398-415.
  33. Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and social psychology review, 10(2), 88-110.
  34. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through selfcategorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 223-255.
  35. Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338-342.
  36. Hogg, M. A., & Adelman, J. (2013). Uncertainty-identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 436-454.
  37. Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061-1066.
  38. Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (Eds.) (2012). Terrorism studies: A reader. New YorK: Routledge.
  39. Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25-43.
  40. Jolley, D., Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 17-35.
  41. Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: The system- justifying function of conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 39(2), 465-478.
  42. Klein, K. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). Commitment and extremism: A goal systemic analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 419-435.
  43. Kramlich, D., & Romano, A. (2020). Leveraging (the potential of) the multiethnic classroom: Using the constructs of cultural humility and safety to provide belonging for Cross Cultural Kid (CCK) refugees. Educational Reflective Practices, 1(2), 146-178. DOI:10.3280/ERP2020-001008.
  44. Kruglanski, A. W., Szumowska, E., Kopetz, C. H., Vallerand, R. J., & Pierro, A. (2021). On the psychology of extremism: How motivational imbalance breeds intemperance. Psychological Review, 128(2), 264-289.
  45. Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69-93.
  46. Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., Gelfand, M., Gunaratna, R., Hettiarachchi, M., Reinares, F., Orehek, E., Sasota, J., & Sharvit, K. (2013). Terrorism-A (self) love story: Redirecting the significance quest can end violence. American Psychologist, 68(7), 559-575.
  47. Kruglanski, A. W., & Orehek, E. (2011). The role of the quest for personal significance in motivating terrorism. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. Orehek (Eds.), The psychology of social conflict and aggression (pp. 153-166). New York: Psychology Press.
  48. Lamberty, P., & Leiser, D. (2019). Sometimes you just have to go in –The link between conspiracy beliefs and political action. psiarxiv.com.
  49. Leone, L., Giacomantonio, M., Williams, R., & Michetti, D. (2018). Avoidant attachment style and conspiracy ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 329-336.
  50. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS one, 8(10), e75637.
  51. Liht, J., & Savage, S. (2013). Preventing violent extremism through value complexity: Being Muslim being British. Journal of Strategic Security, 6(4), 44-66.
  52. Marcelli, S., Valerii, M. (2021). Diciassettesimo rapporto sulla comunicazione. I media dopo la pandemia, Roma: Censis.
  53. McBride, M. K. (2011). The logic of terrorism: Existential anxiety, the search for meaning, and terrorist ideologies. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(4), 560-581.
  54. Meeus, W. (2015). Why do young people become Jihadists? A theoretical account on radical identity development. European Journal of
  55. Developmental Psychology, 12(3), 275-281.
  56. Melacarne, C., & Nicolaides, A. (2019). Developing Professional Capability: Growing Capacity and Competencies to Meet Complex Workplace Demands. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 163, 37-51.
  57. Mezirow, J. (2003). Apprendimento e trasformazione. Milano: Cortina Editore.
  58. Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American psychologist, 60(2), 161-169.
  59. Molinario, E., Elster, A., Kruglanski, A. W, Jasko, K., Webber, D, Sensales, G., Agostini, M., Leander, P., Szumowska, E. Striving for Significance: Development and Validation of the Quest for Significance Scale. [Unpublished Manuscript].
  60. Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and political violence, 21(2), 239-260.
  61. OECD (2021). Government at a Glance.
  62. Pavela Banai, I., Banai, B., & Mikloušić, I. (2021). Beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, compliance with the preventive measures, and trust in government medical officials. Current Psychology, 1-11.
  63. Popper, K. (2014). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge.
  64. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  65. Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356.
  66. Sabic-El-Rayess, A., & Marsick. V.J. (2021). Transformative Learning and Extremism. In J. Walker, G. Maestrini & S. Smythe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Adult Education in Global Times Conference/Actes de la Éducation des adults dans les temps globaux conférence (pp. 636-638). OTTAWA, ON: Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education (CASAE).
  67. Savage, S., & Liht, J. (2008). Mapping fundamentalisms: The psychology of religion as a sub-discipline in the understanding of religiously motivated violence. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 30(1), 75-92.
  68. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of counseling psychology, 53(1), 80-93.
  69. Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., ... & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242-1254.
  70. Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: Social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current opinion in psychology, 35, 1-6.
  71. Stojanov, A., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The Conspiracy Mentality Scale: Distinguishing between irrational and rational suspicion. Social Psychology, 50(4), 215-232. Doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000381.
  72. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real- world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443-463.
  73. Taylor, D. M., & Louis, W. (2004). Terrorism and the quest for identity. In F. M. Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and interventions (pp. 169-185). American Psychological Association.
  74. Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York: Oxford University Press. Doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001.
  75. Van Prooijen, J. W., & Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753-761.
  76. Van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory studies, 10(3), 323-333.
  77. Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van Lange, P. A. (2014). Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders. Cambridge University Press.
  78. Van Raemdonck, N. (2019). The echo chamber of anti-vaccination conspiracies: Mechanisms of radicalization on Facebook and Reddit. Institute for Policy, Advocacy and Governance (IPAG) Knowledge Series, Forthcoming.
  79. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
  80. Wong, A., Ho, S., Olusanya, O., Antonini, M. V., & Lyness, D. (2021). The use of social media and online communications in times of pandemic COVID-19. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22(3), 255-260.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...