Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

Articoli

No. 4 (2021)

Early intervention in psychosis. How can it be useful? A catamnestic study in an Italian Community Mental Health Center

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2021oa13393
Submitted
febbraio 22, 2022
Published
2022-02-22

Abstract

Objective: Early intervention demonstrates that, when psychotic symptoms are treated early, a higher therapeutic success rate is guaranteed. Besides, this kind of treatment maximizes the effectiveness of the interventions. The study aims to identify innovative therapeutic and assistance treatment and to investigate the effects of an integrated and multidimensional treatment after one year on subjects at risk mental states.
Methods: This catamnestic study observed 30 young patients during one year of treatment, comparing the standard care protocol with a specialized early intervention named TR-43 Project. The therapeutic course and outcome were evaluated through the consultations of subjects’ medical records and the administration of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF).
Results: The entire group presented a statistically significant GAF score increase. The TR-43 Project staff showed a more consistent presence of professionals complementary to the psychiatrist.
Conclusions: The positive outcome observed in the whole group attested appropriate patient management, while the lower presence of the psychiatrist observed in the TR-43 staff is likely useful to prevent patients’ medicalization. An integrated and multidimensional treatment, such as the TR-43 Project, can produce better clinical outcomes than a generic one.

References

  1. Aceituno, D., Vera, N., Prina, A. M., & McCrone, P. (2019) Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis: systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1-7. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.298.
  2. Frances, A., Pincus, H. A., & First, M. B. (1994) The global assessment of functioning scale (GAF). In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. Haaga, D.A.F. (2000) Introduction to the special section on Stepped Care Models in Psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 547-548.
  4. McGorry, P.D. (2008) Is early intervention in the major psychiatric disorders justified?. Yes. British Medical Journal, 337: a695. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a695.
  5. McGorry, P.D. (2015) Early Intervention in Psychosis. Obvious, Effective, Overdue. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203(5), 310-318. DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000284.
  6. McGorry, P.D. (2012) Truth and reality in early intervention. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 313-6. DOI: 10.1177/2F0004867412442172.
  7. Moos, R.H., McCoy, L., Moos, B.S. (2000) Global assessment of functioning (GAF) ratings: determinants and roles ad predictors of one-year treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 449-61.
  8. Pelosi, A. (2008) Is early intervention in the major psychiatric disorders justified? No. British Medical Journal, 337: a710. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a710.
  9. Pelosi, A., Birchwood M. (2003) Is early intervention for psychosis a waste of valuable resources?. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(3), 196-198.
  10. Singh, S. P. (2010) Early intervention in psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196(5), 343-345.
  11. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 20, 2191-2194.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...