Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articoli

No. 2 (2021): Renzo Canestrari and the development of Italian psychology

How experimental neuropsychology and clinical neuropsychology started and developed at the University of Bologna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2021oa12599
Submitted
settembre 22, 2021
Published
2021-10-05

Abstract

This paper relates how modern psychology, which is mostly devoted to the exploration of cognitive processes and their neural bases, started been practiced at the University of Bologna in the second half of the ’60s of last century, especially because of prof. Renzo Canestrari’s effort and commitment. In those years, prof. Canestrari’s scientific interests were mainly inclined toward clinical psychology and investigating visual perception through gestaltist paradigms. However, he proved open minded enough as to promote research in fields much distant from those he was working on. The chapter relates how he supported projects, widely recognized internationally, that explored cognitive processes and functional hemispheric specialization by means of recording speed of response (i.e., reaction times). In addition, prof. Canestrari supported projects that explored cognitive deficits in brain-damaged patients. These studies, besides producing results that were internationally recognized, were also instrumental in producing positive effects in the field of clinical neuropsychology and neural rehabilitation. An outstanding example is the Center for Cognitive Neurosciences in Cesena.

References

  1. Anzola, G.P., & Nicoletti, R. (1982). Dominanza cerebrale assoluta e relativa. In C. Umiltà (a cura di), Neuropsicologia Sperimentale (pp. 77- 93). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Berlucchi, G., Heron, W., Hyman, R., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1971). Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. Brain, 94, 419-430. DOI: 10.1093/brain/94.3.419.
  3. Bonaiuto, P., & Umiltà, C. (1965). La “privazione senso-motoria” come tecnica per la modificazione delle variabili personali degli “effetti di campo”. In Atti del XV Congresso degli Psicologi Italiani (pp. 259-264). Torino: Istituto di Psicologia.
  4. Bonaiuto, P., Balloni, A., & Umiltà, C. (1967). Contributo allo studio differenziale degli “effetti di campo”. Verifica della tendenza ad una forte coesione strutturale in schizofrenici paranoidei, mediante tecniche di after-effects. Psichiatria Generale e dell'Età Evolutiva, 5, 433-489.
  5. Bonaiuto, P., Borromei, A., & Umiltà, C. (1965). Contributo allo studio differenziale degli “effetti di campo”. Rassegna critica sugli after-effects di grandezza tattile-cinestesica e verifiche sperimentali in soggetti cerebrolesi. Giornale di Psichiatria e Neuropatologia, 93 (4s), 1-153.
  6. Brighetti, G., Brunori, P., Caramelli, N., Cavallero, C., Cicogna, P.C., Contento, S., Giusberti, F., Ladavas, E., Nicoletti, R., Palomba, D., Stame, S., & Tabossi, P. (1981). Directions to masters. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 8, 349-352.
  7. Canestrari, R.: 6401, 6501, 6512, 6513, 7105, 7501, 8301.
  8. Corazza, R., Tradardi, V., & Umiltà, C. (1969). Type of response to steady illumination and level of neuronal dark discharge in the central visual pathways. Brain Research, 16,121-132. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90089-4.
  9. Corazza, R., Tradardi, V., & Umiltà, C. (1971). Tonic responses to steady diffuse illumination of the maintained neuronal discharge in the cat visual pathways. Brain Research, 27, 241-250. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90251-4.
  10. Corazza, R., Tradardi, V., & Umiltà, C. (1972). Influence of wakefulness and synchronized sleep upon the tonic response to steady, diffuse illumination of catʼs central visual path neurons. Brain Research, 36, 459-462. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90755-x.
  11. Di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas. E., & Farné, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 388, 730. DOI: 10.1038/41921.
  12. Dorello, U., Bonaiuto, P., & Umiltà, C. (1964). Rilievi sulla frequenza critica di fusione e sullʼadattamento allʼoscurità dopo privazione sensoriale. Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale, 40, 963-966.
  13. Farnè, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123, 2350-2360. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2350.
  14. Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N., & Làdavas, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 332-343. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1262-y.
  15. Frassinetti, F., Pavani, F., & Làdavas, E. (2002). Acoustical vision of neglected stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs in neglect patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 62-69. DOI: 10.1162/089892902317205320.
  16. Frassinetti, F., Rossi, M., Làdavas, E. (2001). Passive limb movements improve visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39, 725-733. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00156-1.
  17. Hebb, D.O. (1949) The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory. Wiley, New York (trad. ital. La ricerca in psicologia. Milano: Martello, 1969).
  18. Hyman, R. (1964), The Nature of Psychological Inquiry, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall (trad. ital. L'indagine sperimentale in psicologia. Milano: Martello. 1975).
  19. Hyman, R., & Umiltà, C. (1969). The information hypothesis and non-repetitions. In W.G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 37-53). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  20. Làdavas, E. (1987). Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? Brain, 110, 167-180. DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.1.167.
  21. Làdavas, E. (2002). Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(1), 17-22. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01814-3.
  22. Làdavas, E., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Neuropsicologia. Bologna: il Mulino.
  23. Làdavas, E., Umiltà, C., & Provinciali, L. (1979). Hemispheric-dependent cognitive performances in epileptic patients. Epilepsia, 20, 493-502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1979.tb04831.x.
  24. Làdavas, E, Umiltà C., & Ricci-Bitti P.E. (1980) Evidence for sex differences in right-hemisphere dominance for emotions. Neuropsychologia, 18, 361-366.
  25. Nicoletti, R. (1981a). Confronto di due ipotesi sulla specializzazione emisferica. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 8: 125-139.
  26. Nicoletti, R. (1981b). Effetto di compatibilità e stadi di elaborazione dellʼinformazione. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 8: 475-489.
  27. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G.P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.8.5.664.
  28. Nicoletti, R., & Fairweather, H. (1979). La specializzazione emisferica negli effetti di ripetizione e compatibilità. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 9, 541-559.
  29. Pavani, F., Làdavas, E., & Driver J. (2003). Auditory and multisensory aspects of visuospatial neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 407-414. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00189-x.
  30. Rizzolatti, G., Umiltà, C., & Berlucchi, G. (1971). Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain, 94, 431-442. DOI: 10.1093/brain/94.3.431.
  31. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. 1985. Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M.I. Posner and O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance XI (pp. 457-471). Hillsdale (N.J.): Erlbaum.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...