Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Ricerche di Psicologia/Psychological Research Journal - Open Access

FORUM: “IL CONTRIBUTO DI MARCELLO CESA-BIANCHI ALLO SVILUPPO DELLA PSICOLOGIA IN

No. 1 (2021): The contribution of Marcello Cesa Bianchi to the growth of psychology in Italy

The patient-doctor relation: A dialogue between psychology and medicine about adaptation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rip1-2021oa11606
Submitted
aprile 6, 2021
Published
2021-04-06

Abstract

The doctor-patient relationship, a subject widely debated in the literature, is proposed here indicating adaptation as a meeting ground in which medicine and psychology can dialogue, sharing the same point of observation, while maintaining their specificity of reading phenomena and intervention.
Life is a continuous adaptive process whose history is the deterministic and unpredictable result of the interplay of resources, possibilities, constraints, limits and opportunities of both the subject and reality.
This formulation of adaptation applies as much to biological development as to psychological development and, despite the difference in observable "materials", offers a common observation vertex.
Illness is an almost inevitable event in life and involves the subject in all its bio-psycho-social complexity.
Hence, the urge to include the patient with his subjectivity (values, history, emotions, fantasies ...) within the clinical field. This inclusion, however, raises two questions: on the one hand, on the reasons for the eclipse of the interest in subjectivity and, on the other hand, on the potential added value brought by the
presence of the patient’s subjectivity in the clinical field.
The logic of the development of knowledge and techniques in medicine explains the reasons for the progressive disinterest in subjectivity, but the same development implies the valorisation of biological individuality. Individuality is not, in itself, subjectivity, but is undoubtedly the way to take into account the singularity of the processes adaptive to the disease.
The inclusion of subjectivity, if it appears clearly advantageous for the patient, also offers the clinician the advantage of active participation and adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. In the patient’s narration of the history of the illness, in fact, one can also trace and understand his adaptive strategy. In particular, the proposal of reading the narration is made by assuming as organizers of the narration the experience of the disease and the expectations towards the caregiver.

References

  1. Cesa-Bianchi, M., Bosio, A. (1996-7). Contributi per la Medicina. Ricerche di Psicologia, 18(4) 19(1).
  2. Canguilhem, G. (1958). Qu’est-ce que la psychologie? Canguilhem G. Études d’histoires et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Vrin.
  3. Canguilhem, G. (1985). Le statut épistémologique de la médecine. In Canguilhem G. (2002) Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences concernant les vivants et la vie. Paris: Vrin.
  4. Ceruti, M. (1986). Il vincolo e la possibilità. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  5. Charon, R. (2006). Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Cipolli, C. & Moja, E.A. (2015). Le comunicazioni difficili in medicina: come apprendere (e formare) specifiche abilità comunicative?. Ricerche di Psicologia, 38(3): 487-498.
  7. Freud, S. (1899). L’interpretazione dei sogni. Opere di Sigmund Freud. Torino: Boringhieri (1966).
  8. Guerra, G. (2001). Che cos’è la psicologia? Commento a un saggio di Georges Canguilhem. Teorie & Modelli, VI(3) 5- 25.
  9. Guerra, G. (2003). Autonomy and Constructivism. European Journal of School Psychology, 1(1), 97-118.
  10. Guerra, G. (2004). Qu’est-ce qu’est un fait clinique?. Psychologie clinique, Nouvelle série, 17, 29-44.
  11. Guerra, G. (2006). Meccanismi difensivi istituzionali. In Giordano M. (Ed.), Burnout-
  12. Seminario gruppoanalitico nazionale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Guerra, G. (2010). La place de la subjectivité dans le champ de la médecine. Cliniques méditerranéennes, 82, 73-85.
  14. Guerra, G. (2017). Autonomy: A Concept at the Crossroads of Medicine and Psychology. In Freda, M. F. & De Luca Picione, R. (Eds.), Healthcare and Culture: Subjectivity in Medical Contexts. Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  15. Hood, L. & Flores, M. (2012). A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnology, 29(6): 613-624.
  16. Loch, W. (1970). Premesse e meccanismi del processo psicoanalitico. Torino: Boringhieri.
  17. Menzies, I. E. P. (1970). The functioning of Social Systems as a Defence against Anxiety. London: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
  18. Moja, E.A. & Vegni, E. (2000). La visita medica centrata sul paziente. Milano: Cortina.
  19. Porro, A. (2012). De senectute: stereotipi e realtà nei secoli. Ricerche di Psicologia, 2-3, 183-193.
  20. Quill, T. E. & Holloway, R. G. (2012). Evidence, Preferences, Recommendations-Finding the Right Balance in Patient Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(3), 1653-1655.
  21. Solano L. (Ed.) (2011). Dal Sintomo alla Persona: Medico e Psicologo insieme per l’assistenza di base. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Solano, L. (2014). Through symptoms to subjects: the family physician and the psychologist together in primary care. In Emde, R. N., Leutzinger-Bohleber, M. (Eds), Early parenting and prevention of disorder: Psychoanalytic Research at Interdisciplinary Frontiers. London: Karnac.
  23. Zorrilla Ruiz, C. (2019). Dall’esperienza all’apprendimento: transizioni nella costruzione
  24. di un pensiero sull’intervento psicologico in un reparto di Diabetologia e Malattie Metaboliche. Tesi di Specializzazione in Psicologia della Salute, Università La Sapienza, Roma.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...