Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli

N. 58 (2023)

L’uso delle mascherine in analisi: relazione terapeutica e terapia online al tempo della pandemia di Covid-19

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/jun58-2023oa17156
Inviata
19 gennaio 2024
Pubblicato
31-01-2024

Abstract

A causa della pandemia di Covid-19, in molti paesi, le mascherine facciali sono state rese obbligatorie in ambienti chiusi per prevenire l’infezione e sono state adottate da molti analisti per proseguire il lavoro terapeutico “in presenza”. Questo articolo analizza gli effetti del loro utilizzo nell’ambito della psicoterapia a orientamento analitico. Dopo avere intervistato 305 persone (163 analisti e 142 pazienti) impegnate in trattamenti psicoterapeutici vis à vis, si è rilevato che l’utilizzo delle mascherine in analisi è stato un evento sicuramente significativo ma meno impattante di quanto si pensi. Le terapie analitiche, nei vissuti di pazienti e analisti, hanno mostrato una certa resilienza sopportando un cambiamento di setting così improvviso e perturbante grazie a fattori peculiari quali l’investimento nella relazione terapeutica, l’attenzione alla comunicazione inconscia e la considerazione nello scambio terapeutico della dimensione simbolica. L’approccio relazionale in analisi si conferma di grande utilità clinica e la relazione terapeutica elemento protettivo oltre che di cura. La terapia online, inoltre, si definisce, in questo studio, come terapia di seconda scelta rispetto alla terapia in presenza anche quando la coppia analitica è costretta a stare in stanza di analisi con il viso parzialmente coperto dalle mascherine.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Aafjes-van Doorn K., Békés V., Prout T.A. (2020). Grappling with our therapeutic relationship and professional self-doubt during COVID-19: Will we use video therapy again? Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34: 473-484. DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2020.1773404.
  2. Adolphs R. (2002). Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev., 1: 21-62. DOI: 10.1177/ 1534582302001001003.
  3. Arghya P., Prashant G., Arpit P., Pawan S. (2020). “Masking” of the mental state: Unintended consequences of personal protective equipment (PPE) on psychiatric clinical practice. Psychiatry Research, 290. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113178.
  4. Békés V., Aafjes-van Doorn K. (2020). Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30, 2: 238-247. DOI: 10.1037/int0000214.
  5. Békés V., Aafjes-van Doorn K., Prout T.A., Hoffman L. (2020). Stretching the analytic frame: Analytic therapists’ experiences with remote therapy during COVID-19. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68, 3: 437-446. DOI: 10.1177/ 0003065120939298.
  6. Blais C., Roy C., Fiset D., Arguin M., Gosselin F. (2012). The eyes are not the window to basic emotions. Neuropsychologia, 50: 2830-2838. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2012.08.010.
  7. Bruce V., Young A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal Psychology, 77: 305-327. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x.
  8. Calbi M., Langiulli N., Ferroni F., Montalti M., Kolesnikov A., Gallese V., Umiltà M.A. (2021). The consequences of covid-19 on social interactions: an online study on face covering. Sci. Rep., 11. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81780-w.
  9. Carbon C.C. (2020). Wearing facemasks strongly confuses counterparts in reading emotions. Front. Psychol., 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566886.
  10. Carragher D.J., Hancock P.J.B. (2020). Surgical face masks impair human face matching performance for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Cogn. Research, 5: 59. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-00258-x.
  11. Colman W. (2013). Bringing it all back home: how I became a relational analyst. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 58, 4: 470-459. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12028.
  12. Di Giuseppe B., Martini S. (2020). Il lockdown e l’“Upside Down”. Potenzialità e rischi della psicoterapia on line al tempo del coronavirus. Psicobiettivo, 2: 81-94. DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2020-002007.
  13. Dimberg U., Andréasson P., Thunberg M. (2011). Emotional empathy and facial reactions to facial expressions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25: 26-31. DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000029.
  14. Fitousi D., Rotschild N., Pnini C., Azizi O. (2021). Understanding the Impact of Face Masks on the Processing of Facial Identity, Emotion, Age, and Gender. Front. Psychol., 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743793.
  15. Giorgi L. (2021). Not a political statement: Psychoanalytic notes on the measures to fight the pandemic and the responses to them. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 18, 2: 224-231. DOI: 10.1002/aps.1700.
  16. Grundmann F., Epstude K., Scheibe S. (2021). Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness. PLOS ONE, 16, 4. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249792.
  17. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci., 4: 223-233. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0.
  18. Hess U., Fischer A. (2013). Emotional mimicry asocial regulation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 17: 142-157. DOI: 10.1177/1088868312472607.
  19. Humer E., Pieh C., Kuska M., Barke A., Doering B.K., Gossmann K., Probst T. (2020). Provision of psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak psychotherapists. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 13: 4811. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134811.
  20. Jung C.G. (1921). Der therapeutische Wert des Abreagierens (trad. it.: Il valore terapeutico dell’abreazione. In: Opere, vol. 16. Torino: Boringhieri, 1981).
  21. Jung C.G. (1928). Analytische Psychologie und Weltanschauung (trad. it.: Psicoterapia analitica e concezione del mondo. In: Opere, vol. 8. Torino: Boringhieri, 1976).
  22. Jung C.G. (1929). Die Probleme der modernen Psychoterapie (trad. it.: Problemi della psicoterapia moderna. In: Opere, vol. 16. Torino: Boringhieri, 1981).
  23. Jung C.G. (1934). Zur gegenwärtingen Lage der Psychoterapie (trad. it.: Situazione attuale della psicoterapia. In: Opere, vol. 10. Torino: Boringhieri, 1985).
  24. Jung C.G. (1935). Grundsätzliches zur praktischen Psychoterapie (trad. it.: Principi di psicoterapia pratica. In: Opere, vol. 16. Torino: Boringhieri, 1981).
  25. Jung C.G. (1946). Die Psychologie der Übertragung (trad. it.: Psicologia della traslazione. In: Opere, vol. 16. Torino: Boringhieri, 1981).
  26. Kastendieck T., Zillmer S., Hess U. (2021). (Un)mask yourself! Effects of face masks on facial mimicry and emotion perception during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogn. Emotion, 36: 59-69. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1950639.
  27. Marini M., Ansani A., Paglieri F., Caruana F., Viola M. (2021). The impact of facemasks on emotion recognition, trust attribution and re-identification. Scientific Reports, 11: 5577. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84806-5.
  28. Marler H., Ditton A. (2021). “I’m smiling back at you”: exploring the impact of mask wearing on communication in healthcare. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord., 56: 205-214. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12578.
  29. Merchant J. (2016). The use of Skype in analysis and training: a research and literature review. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 61, 3: 309-328. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12224.
  30. Olivera-LaRosa A., Chuquichambi E.G., Ingram G.P.D. (2020). Keep your (social) distance: pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19. Pers. Individ. Dif., 166. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110200.
  31. Oosterhof N.N., Todorov A. (2009). Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion, 9: 128-133. DOI: 10.1037/a0014520.
  32. Oruc I., Balas B., Landy M.S. (2019). Face perception: A brief journey through recent dis-coveries and current directions. Vision Research, 157: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres. 2019.06.005.
  33. Palagi E., Celeghin A., Tamietto M., Winkielman P., Norscia I. (2020). The neuroethology of spontaneous mimicry and emotional contagion in human and non-human animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 111: 149-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.020.
  34. Ribeiro E., Ferreira A., Cardoso C., Queiroz R., Silva V. (2021). Face-to-Face Clinical Practice under Covid-19 Pandemic: How Psychotherapists Describe Their Experiences. Front. Psychol., 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726439.
  35. Roberson D., Kikutani M., Döge P., Whitaker L., Majid A. (2012). Shades of emotion: What the addition of sunglasses or masks to faces reveals about the development of facial expression processing. Cognition, 125: 195-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012. 06.018.
  36. Robinson K., Blais C., Duncan J., Forget H., Fiset D. (2014). The dual nature of the human face: There is a little jekyll and a little hyde in all of us. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 139. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00139.
  37. Röesler C. (2017). Tele-analysis: the use of media technology in psychotherapy and its impact on the therapeutic relationship. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62, 3: 372-394. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12317.
  38. Saunders G.H., Jackson I.R., Visram A.S. (2020). Impact of face coverings on communication: an indirect impact of COVID-19. International Journal of Audiology, 60, 7: 495-506. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1851401.
  39. Sedgwick D. (2014). Jung as pioneer of relational analysis. Paper presented in March 2012 at the 10th Anniversary Conference on the International Association for Relational Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis (IARPP) in New York: https://www.nwaps.org/sites/default/files/Jung%20as%20a%20Pioneer%20of%20Relational%20Analysis.pdf.
  40. Tramacere A., Ferrari P.F. (2016). Faces in the mirror, from the neuroscience of mimicry to the emergence of mentalizing. J. Anthropol. Sci., 94: 113-126. DOI: 10.4436/ JASS.94037.
  41. Vainshelboim B. (2020). Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: a health hypothesis. Med. Hypotheses, 146. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.202o.110411.
  42. Wegrzyn M., Vogt M., Kireclioglu B., Schneider J., Kissler J. (2017). Mapping the emotional face. How individual face parts contribute to successful emotion recognition. PLOS ONE, 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177239.
  43. Wieckowski A.T., Flynn L.T., Richey J.A., Gracanin D., White S.W. (2020). Measuring change in facial emotion recognition in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Autism, 24, 7: 1607-1628. DOI: 10.1177/1362361320925334.
  44. Yi H., Pingsterhaus A., Song W. (2021). Effects of wearing face masks while using different speaking styles in noise on speech intelligibility during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682677.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...