Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli

N. 2 (2024)

Learning Environments and New Technologies: Pedagogical Perspectives for the development of Inclusive Educational Scenarios

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/erpoa2-2024oa18715
Inviata
24 ottobre 2024
Pubblicato
23-01-2025

Abstract

The ongoing technological revolution in the present era brings forth new demands within the realm of education, necessitating the creation of innovative pedagogical and educational encounters. Learning through technologies serves as a framework to facilitate teaching, enabling the introduction of new experiences and social practices aimed at generating new knowledge and competencies. Within this framework, the realm of physical education demonstrates substantial interconnectedness with the application of technological tools that can serve as assets for its advancement. Hence, the objective of this manuscript is to provide insights and novel viewpoints regarding the influence of emerging information and communication technologies on the processes of teaching and learning. Indeed, these new technologies enable the diversification of teaching approaches, allowing all students to engage in knowledge acquisition through practical involvement and personal experimentation, thereby expanding the realms of perceptual-motor activities. By leveraging these new technologies, educators can create inclusive learning environments that cater to the diverse needs of all students, regardless of their abilities or backgrounds. However, it’s essential to ensure that technology integration is done thoughtfully and with consideration for accessibility, equity, and inclusivity. Ongoing professional development and support for educators are also crucial to maximize the potential of these technologies in promoting inclusive didactics.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Banville, B., & Polifko, M. (2009). Using digital video recorders in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 80(1), pp. 17-21.
  2. Barron, A. E., Orwig, G. W., Ivers, K. S., & Lilavois, N. (2001). Technologies for education. (4th ed.). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited-Greenwood Publishing Groups, Inc.
  3. Berthoz, A. (2009). The Human Brain Projects upon the World. Simplifying Principles and Rules for Perception, in A. Berthoz, Y. Christen, (a cura di), Neurobiology of Umwelt. How Living Beings Perceive the World. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Berthoz, A., & Jorland, G. (2004). L’empathie. Odile Jacob.
  5. Beyerbach, B. A., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. A. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Pre-service teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, pp. 105-127.
  6. Block, B. (2008). Using iPods in dance pedagogy. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(7), pp. 25-28.
  7. Bortoli, L., & Robazza C. (2016). L’apprendimento delle abilità motorie. Due approcci tra confronto e integrazione. SdS/Scuola dello Sport, 35(109), pp. 23-34.
  8. Bottino, R. (2015). Evoluzione e prospettive nella ricerca in tecnologie didatti-che. La Didattica nell’era digitale, a cura di V. Campione, pp. 23-38, il Mulino, Bologna.
  9. Campos, C.M., & del Castillo Fernández, H. (2016). The benefits of active video games for educational and physical activity approaches: A systematic review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(2), 115.
  10. Chiappini, G., & Manca S. (2006). L'introduzione delle tecnologie educative nel contesto scolastico italiano. Form@re. Newsletter per la formazione in rete, 46.
  11. Cippitelli, E., Gambi, E., & Spinsante, S., (2017). Radar and RGB-Depth Sensors for fall detection: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(12).
  12. Clapham, E.D., Sullivan, E.C., & Ciccomascolo, L.E. (2015). Effects of a physical education supportive curriculum and technological devices on physical activity. The Physical Educator, 72(1), pp. 102-116.
  13. Colella, D. (2016). The contribution of technology to the teaching of physical education and health promotion. Motor competences and physical activity levels, in Novak D., Antala B., Knjaz D. (Eds.), Physical education and new technologies, pp. 51-60, Croatian Kinesiology association, Zagreb, Printed by: Tiskara Zelina, Katarine Krizmanić 1, 10380 Sveti Ivan Zelina.
  14. Colella, D., & Monacis, D., (2022). Il contributo degli Exergames per lo sviluppo delle funzioni esecutive dei bambini con disturbi dello spettro autistico. Revisione sistematica della letteratura. Formazione & Insegnamento, XX–1s. doi: 10.7346/-feis-XX-01-22_13.
  15. Colella, D., & Vasciarelli, E. (2020). La formazione degli insegnanti attraverso la video-analisi. attualità e prospettive. MeTis. Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni 10(1), pp. 18-34.
  16. Colella, D., Morano, M., & Bortoli, L., (2007). Metodi di valutazione dei livelli di attività fisica. SDS/Rivista di Cultura Sportiva, xxvi(73).
  17. Commissione delle Comunità Europee (2005). Raccomandazione del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio relativa a competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. Bruxelles.
  18. Coshott, R., Thin, A., & Young, B. W. M. (2009). Exergaming definition Retrieved November 8, 2009, from www.exergaming.pbworks.com.
  19. Damasio, A. (1995). L’errore di Cartesio. Emozione, ragione e cervello umano. Milano: Adelphi.
  20. De Simone, G. (2023). Strumenti metodologici e nuove tecnologie per l’apprendimento in rete. Mizar. Costellazione di pensieri, 1(18), pp. 74-87.
  21. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interac-tion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT press.
  22. Duncan, M., Birch, S., & Woodfield, L. (2012). Efficacy of an integrated school curriculum pedometer intervention to enhance physical activity and to reduce weight status in children. European Physical Education Review, 18, pp. 396-407.
  23. Fabiano, A. (2020). Didattica digitale e inclusione nella scuola dell’autonomia (Vol. 1, pp. 1-224). Anicia Editore.
  24. Fedeli, L., & Rossi, P.G. (2011). Percorsi di apprendimento in Second Life: il valore del concetto di embodiment, in M.B. Ligorio, E. Mazzoni, A. Simone, M. Schaerf (a cura di), Didattica on-line nell'Università: teorie, esperienze e strumenti, Editore Scriptaweb, pp. 204-226.
  25. Fiorentino-Holland, L., & Gibbone, A. (2005). Using the Virtual Gym for practice and drills. Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 16(5), pp. 14-16.
  26. Freedson, P.S., & Miller, K. (2000). Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 71 Suppl 2, pp. 21-29. Doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082782.
  27. Gallego-Lema, V., Munoz-Cristobal, A.J., Arribas-Cubero, F.H., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2017). Orienteering in the Natural Environment: Ubiquitous Learning Through the Use of Technology. Movimento, 23(2), pp. 755-770.
  28. Gallese V. (2005). Being like me: self-other identity, mirror neurons and empathy. In: Hurley & Chater, Vol. 1.
  29. Gashaj, V., Dapp, L. C., Trninic, D., & Roebers, C. M. (2021). The effect of video games, exergames and board games on executive functions in kindergarten and 2nd grade: An explorative longitudinal study. Trends in neuroscience and education, 25, 100162. Doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2021.100162.
  30. George, A.M., Rohr, L.E., & Byrne, J. (2016). Impact of Nintendo Wii games on physical literacy in children: Motor skills, physical fitness, activity behaviors, and knowledge. Sports, 4(1), 3.
  31. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley, New York.
  32. Glenberg, A. M., Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), pp. 558-565.
  33. Gomez Paloma, F. & Damiani, P. (2015). Cognizione corporea, competenze integrate e formazione dei docenti. I tre volti dell’Embodied Cognitive Science per una scuola inclusiva. Trento: Centro Studi Erickson.
  34. Gomez Paloma, F. (2013). Embodied Cognitive Science. Atti incarnati della didattica. Roma: Nuova Cultura.
  35. Grissom, T., Ward, P., Martin, B. & Leenders, N. (2005). Physical Activity in Physical 397 Education: Teacher or Technology Effects. Family and Community Health, 28, pp. 125-129.
  36. Holland, S., Wilkie, K., Bouwer, A., M., D., & Mulholland, P. (2011). Whole Body Interaction in Abstract Domains. In D. England (Ed.), Whole Body Interaction. (Vol. Human-Computer Interaction Series). London: Springer Verlag.
  37. Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2009). Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of DiGRA 2009 Brunel University, UK.
  38. Ladda, S., Keating, T., Adams, D., & Toscano, L. (2004). Including technology in instructional programs. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 75(4), pp. 12-13.
  39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  40. Lindberg, R., Seo, J., & Laine, T.H. (2016). Enhancing Physical Education with Exergames and Wearable Technology, in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), pp. 328-341, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2016.2556671.
  41. Lo Presti, F., & Zizza, S. (2024). L’uso delle nuove tecnologie nei percorsi didattici e di formazione. Possibilità di sviluppo e versanti critici. NUOVA SECONDARIA, pp. 346-355.
  42. Johnson M. (1987). The body in the mind, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  43. Majumder, S., Mondal, T., & Deen, M. J. (2017). Wearable Sensors for Remote Health Monitoring. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 17(1), 130. Doi: 10.3390/s17010130.
  44. Marsh, K.L., Richardson, M.J., & Schmidt, R.C. (2009). Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination. Topics in cognitive science, 1(2), pp. 320-339.
  45. McCaughtry, N., Oliver, K. L., Rocco Dillon, S., & Martin, J. J. (2008). Teachers’ perspectives on the use of pedometers as instructional technology in physical education: A cautionary tale. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(1), pp. 83-99.
  46. McCormack, G. & Giles-Corti, B. (2002) Report to the physical activity taskforce, evaluation and monitoring group: An assessment of self-report questionnaires and motion sensors for measuring physical activity in children. Department of Public Health, The University of Western Australia, Australia.
  47. Melanson, E.L. Jr, & Freedson, P.S. (1996). Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 36(5), pp. 385-396. Doi: 10.1080/10408399609527732.
  48. Mezzani, A., & Giannuzzi, P. (2000). Test ergometrico e livello di attività fisica quotidiana nello scompenso cardiaco cronico. Italian Heart Journal Supplement, 1(3), pp. 384-392.
  49. Monacis, D., & Colella, D., (2019). The contribution of technologies for learning and development of motor skills in early age. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa – Italian Journal of Educational Research. Pensa MultiMedia Editore srl. Doi: 10.7346/SIRD-012019-P31.
  50. Montoye, H.J., & Taylor, H.L. (1984). Measurement of Physical Activity in Population Studies: A Review. Human Biology, 56(2), pp. 195-216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41463567.
  51. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, NASPE (2009). Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines for Children from Birth to Age 5 (2nd ed.). Sewickley, PA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance.
  52. Navidad, L., Padial-Ruz, R., & Cepero González, M., (2021). Nutrition, Physical Activity, and New Technology Programs on Obesity Prevention in Primary Ed-ucation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10187.
  53. Oppert, J.M. (2006). Méthodes d’évaluation de l’activité physique habituelle et obésité. Science & Sports, 21(2), pp. 80-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2006.03.008.
  54. Ozdoba, R., Corbin, C.B., & Le Masurier, G.C. (2004). Does reactivity exist in children when measuring activity levels with unsealed pedometers?. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 16, pp. 158-66.
  55. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: a literature review. Computers & Education, 53(3), pp. 603-622.
  56. Pasco, D., Roure C., Kermarrec G., Pope Z., & Gao Z. (2017). The effects of a bike active video game on players physical activity and motivation. J. Sport Health Sci., 6, pp. 25-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.11.007.
  57. PCPFS, (2004). Physical Activity for Children: Current Patterns and Guidelines. In: The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Research Digest, Series 5, n° 2 June.
  58. Riva, G. (2004), Psicologia dei nuovi media. Teorie, tecniche, formati. Bologna: il Mulino.
  59. Robinson, D. & Randall, L. (2017). Gadgets in the Gymnasium: Physical Educators’ Use of Digital Technologies. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 43(1).
  60. Rossi, P.G. (2011). Didattica enattiva. Complessità, teorie dell’azione, professionalità docente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  61. Rowe, D. A., Mahar, M. T., Raedeke, T. D., & Lore, J. (2004). Measuring physical activity in children with pedometers: Reliability, reactivity, and replacement of missing data. Pediatric Exercise Science, 16, pp. 342-354.
  62. Santoianni, F., Ciasullo, A., & Silva, L. (2023). Flessibilità cognitiva, adattabilità e nuove tecnologie| Cognitive flexibility, adaptability and new technologies. In Ricerca didattica e formazione insegnanti per lo sviluppo delle Soft Skills (pp. 244-257). Pensa Multimedia.
  63. Scruggs, P. W., Beveridge, S. K., & Clocksin, B. D. (2005). Triaxial accelerometry and heart rate telemetry: Relation and agreement with behavioral observation in 174 elementary physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(4), pp. 203-218.
  64. Sgrò, F., Sghembi, R., Pignato, S., & Lipoma, M., (2016). Educazione Motoria, exergamese apprendimento vicariante. Formazione & Insegnamento, XIV(3).
  65. Sibilio, M. (2002). Il corpo intelligente. Napoli: Simone.
  66. Sirard, J. R., Ainsworth, B. E., Mclver, K. L., & Pate, R. R. (2005). Prevalence of active commuting at urban and suburban elementary school in Columbia, SC. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), pp. 236-237.
  67. Staley, D.J. (2004). Adopting digital technologies in the classroom: 10 assessment questions. Educause Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 20-27.
  68. Thomas, M.O., Hong, Y.Y., & Oates, G. (2017). Innovative uses of digital technology in undergraduate mathematics. In: Innovation and Technology Enhancing Mathematics Education (pp. 109-136). Cham: Springer.
  69. van Hilvoorde, I., & Koekoek, J. (2018). Digital Technology in Physical Education. Routledge.
  70. Westerterp, K.R. (1999). Obesity and physical activity. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders. Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 23, Suppl 1, pp. 59-64. Doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800797.
  71. Zhu, W., Cole E.L. (1996). Gross motor mapping. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(2), p. 505.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...