Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito

Articles

N. 1 (2026)

Impact of wind energy on the European interconnections: Congestions, loop-flows and zonal pricing

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/epe2026oa22884
Inviata
26 maggio 2026
Pubblicato
09-06-2026

Abstract

This paper investigates the implications of the substantial expansion of renewable energy sources, particularly wind power, on cross-border electricity trade in Europe. Employing Germany – a market with a high penetration of renewables – as a case study, the analysis demonstrates that during periods of high wind generation, Germany functions as a net exporter to all neighboring jurisdictions. Conversely, during periods of negligible wind injection, Germany reverts to a net importer position. This volatility is attributable, in part, to internal congestion within the German transmission system. In the absence of adequate infrastructure, this bottleneck results in the emergence of loop flows, which compromise network management in adjacent countries. Consequently, it is imperative to invest in domestic grid infrastructure within countries generating these loop flows, while simultaneously incentivizing renewable energy storage. This may be achieved through the reform of transmission and distribution network access tariffs. An alternative market design involves the implementation of zonal pricing (market splitting), as observed in the Nord Pool (e.g., Norway and Sweden), which would internalize congestion constraints. While the implementation of locational marginal pricing is often politically resisted in favor of uniform national pricing to ensure regional equity, the consequent socialization of congestion costs may induce spatial distortions and market inefficiencies.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. ACER (2022). ACER has decided on alternative electricity bidding zone configurations -- https://www.acer.europa.eu/news/acer-has-decided-alternative-electricity-bidding-zoneconfigurations (accessed 4.16.25).
  2. Amundsen, E. S., Bergman, L. (2006). Why has the Nordic electricity market worked so well?. Utilities Policy, 14, 148-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2006.01.001.
  3. Amundsen, E. S., Bergman, L. (2007). Integration of multiple national markets for electricity: The case of Norway and Sweden. Energy Policy, 35, 3383-3394. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.014.
  4. Borowski, P. F. (2020). Zonal and nodal models of energy market in European Union. Energies (Basel), 13. DOI: 10.3390/en13164182.
  5. CRE (2024). Les interconnexions françaises au coeur de l’Europe : vitales face à la crise, indispensables pour la décarbonation. Paris.
  6. CRE (2025). Communication sur les zones pour les utilisateurs éligibles à la composante annuelle d’injection-soutirage introduite dans le TURPE 7 HTB et dans le TURPE 7 HTABT -- https://www.cre.fr/documents/deliberations/communication-sur-les-zones-pourles-
  7. utilisateurs-eligibles-a-la-composante-annuelle-dinjection-soutirage-introduite-dansle-turpe-7-htb-et-dans-le-turpe-7-hta-bt.html (accessed 10.23.25).
  8. Entso-e (2018). Explanatory note on the SEE TSOs proposal for methodology for redispatching and countertrading cost-sharing in accordance with establishing a Guideline on Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management. Entso-e (2024). ENTSO-E Transparency Platform -- https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ (accessed 10.1.24).
  9. Glachant, J. M., Pignon, V. (2005). Nordic congestion’s arrangement as a model for Europe? Physical constraints vs. economic incentives. Utilities Policy, 13, 153-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2004.12.009.
  10. Knörr, J., Bichler, M., Dobos, T. (2025). Zonal vs. Nodal Pricing: An Analysis of Different Pricing Rules in the German Day-Ahead Market.
  11. Lauer, H. (2021). La modernisation des réseaux électriques – talon d’Achille de l’Energiewende -- https://allemagne-energies.com/tag/loop-flows/ (accessed 7.29.24).
  12. Lété, Q., Smeers, Y., Papavasiliou, A. (2022). An analysis of zonal electricity pricing from a long-term perspective. Energy Economics, 107. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105853.
  13. Massicotte, P., South, A. (2025). rnaturalearth: World Map Data from Natural Earth -- https://docs.ropensci.org/rnaturalearth/ (accessed 3.28.25).
  14. Montel (2025). Bidding zone split to impact prices, liquidity -- https://montelnews.com/news/e8d1c443-e71e-42fc-b215-40a7ed24e469/bidding-zone-split-to-impact-prices-liquidityepex-spot (accessed 4.14.25).
  15. Neuhoff, K., Adamson, S., Bichler, M., Klaucke, F., Mindrup, K., Olmos, L., Papavasiliou, A., Staschus, K., Stolle, L., Vitiello, S. (2025). Local marketplaces. DIW, Berlin.
  16. Neuhoff, K., Barquin, J., Bialek, J. W., Boyd, R., Dent, C.J., Echavarren, F., Grau, T., von Hirschhausen, C., Hobbs, B. F., Kunz, F., Nabe, C., Papaefthymiou, G., Weber, C., Weigt, H. (2013). Renewable electric energy integration: Quantifying the value of design of markets for international transmission capacity. Energy Economics, 40, 760-772. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.004.
  17. Percebois, J., Pommeret, S. (2018). Cross-subsidies Tied to the Introduction of Intermittent Renewable Electricity. An Analysis Based on a Model of the French Day-Ahead Market. The Energy Journal, 39, 245-268. DOI: 10.5547/01956574.39.3.jper.
  18. Percebois, J., Pommeret, S. (2021). Efficiency and dependence in the European electricity transition. Energy Policy, 154, 112300. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112300.
  19. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. DOI: 10.1108/eb003648.
  20. Riou, J.-P. (2024). Focus sur les loop flows -- URL https://lemontchampot.blogspot.com/ (accessed 7.29.24).
  21. Sarfati, M., Holmberg, P. (2020). Simulation and evaluation of zonal electricity market designs. Electric Power Systems Research, 185. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106372.
  22. Singh, A., Frei, T., Chokani, N., Abhari, R. S. (2016). Impact of unplanned power flows in interconnected transmission systems – Case study of Central Eastern European region. Energy Policy, 91, 287-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.006.
  23. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York.