Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo

Special issue - The circular economy as a lever for decarbonization

No. 1 (2026)

The agri-food sector’s contribution to decarbonization: Recycling strategies and waste recovery

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/epe2026oa22892
Submitted
maggio 26, 2026
Published
2026-06-09

Abstract

The agri-food sector plays a strategic role in decarbonization due to both its significant environmental footprint and its potential to drive circular and bio-based transitions. This article presents a scoping narrative review of the scientific literature on agri-food waste and by-product valorization pathways as systemic tools for greenhouse gas mitigation and circular bioeconomy development within the European context. Food loss and food waste are analyzed across all stages of the supply chain production, processing, distribution and consumption highlighting their implications for resource efficiency and climate impact. The review integrates technological options including anaerobic digestion, composting, biochar, biomaterials, biorefineries and 3D food printing with enabling dimensions such as digital traceability systems and policy frameworks. Particular attention is devoted to the role of structural factors, including small and medium-sized enterprises and territorial ecosystems, in shaping implementation pathways. Overall, the literature suggests that valorization strategies can reduce the carbon footprint of agri-food systems, foster bio-based markets and strengthen territorial resilience, although environmental benefits depend on scale, governance and effective integration within circular economy frameworks.

References

  1. th REPORT ON THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN ITALY (2025). By the Circular Economy Network. -- https://circulareconomynetwork.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Summary-Report-on-Circular-Economy-in-Italy-2025.pdf.
  2. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe – Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment – Updated bioeconomy strategy, Publications Office, 2018 -- https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/792130.
  3. Adamashvili, N., Zhizhilashvili, N., Tricase, C. (2024). The Integration of the Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, and Blockchain Technology for Advancing the Wine Supply Chain. Computers, 13, 72. DOI: 10.3390/computers13030072.
  4. Ahmad, T., Esposito, F., Cirillo, T., (2024). Valorization of agro-food by-products: Advancing sustainability and sustainable development goals 2030 through functional compounds recovery. Food Bioscience, 62, 105194. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105194.
  5. APAT Manuals and Guidelines (2005). Digestione anaerobica della frazione organica dei rifiuti solidi Aspetti fondamentali, progettuali, gestionali, di impatto ambientale ed integrazione con la depurazione delle acque reflue. -- https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/contentfiles/00003400/3482-manuali-linee-guida-2005.pdf.
  6. Arksey, H., O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
  7. Ashton, K. (2009). That “Internet of Things” thing. RFID Journal, 22(7), 97-114.
  8. Avila, L. B., Pinto, D., Silva Oliveira, L. F. O., Silva de Farias, B. S., Costa Moraes, C. C., Silveira Da Rosa, G., Dotto, G. L. (2022). Antimicrobial bilayer film based on chitosan/electrospun zein fiber loaded with jaboticaba peel extract for food packaging applications. Polymers, 14(24), 5457. DOI: 10.3390/polym14245457.
  9. Bastard, A., Chaillet, A. (2023). Digitalization from vine to wine: Successes and remaining challenges – A review. 44th World Congress of Vine and Wine, 68, 01034. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20236801034.
  10. Biomethane production potentials in the EU – Feasibility of REPowerEU 2030 targets, production potentials in the Member States and outlook to 2050 (2022). A Gas for Climate report/Guidehouse. -- https://gasforclimate2050.eu/publications/.
  11. Çakmakçı, S., Polatoğlu, B., Çakmakçı, R. (2024). Foods of the Future: Challenges, Opportunities, Trends, and Expectations. Foods, 13(17), 2663. DOI: 10.3390/foods13172663.
  12. Centennial Celebration and Congress of the International Union of Soil Sciences IUSS (2024). Abstract Book. -- https://centennialiuss2024.org/.
  13. Charlebois, S., Latif, N., Ilahi, I., Sarker, B., Music, J., Vezeau, J. (2024). Digital Traceability in Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Comparative Analysis of OECD Member Countries. Foods, 13, 1075. DOI: 10.3390/foods13071075.
  14. Cherubini, F. (2010). The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 7, 1412-1421. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015.
  15. Crescente, G., Cascone, G., Volpe, M. G., Moccia, S. (2024). Application of PLA-Based films to preserve strawberries’ bioactive compounds. Foods, 13(12), 1844. DOI: 10.3390/foods13121844.
  16. Curadelli, F., Alberto, M., Martín Uliarte, E., Combina, M., Funes-Pinter, I. (2023). meta-analysis of yields of crops fertilized with compost tea and anaerobic digestate. Sustainability, 15(2), 1357. DOI: 10.3390/su15021357.
  17. Curto, J. P., Gaspar, P. D. (2021). SME focused traceability framework for chain-wide quality and safety-Part 2. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 6, 2, 679-707. DOI: 10.3934/agrfood.2021042.
  18. Curto, J. P., Gaspar, P. D. (2021). Traceability in food supply chains: Review and SME focused analysis-Part 1. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 6, 2, 679-707. DOI: 10.3934/agrfood.2021041.
  19. Debapam, S., Mrutyunjay, P., Azmirul, H., Gajendra, P. (2025). 3D printing technology for valorization of food processing wastes and byproducts: A systematic review. Waste Management Bulletin, 3, 4, 100192. DOI: 10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100192.
  20. Dincă, M. N., Ferdes, M., Zăbavă, B. S., Ionescu, M., Moiceanu, G., Paraschiv, G. (2025). Effective valorization of anaerobic digestate – A sustainable approach to circular economy. Applied Sciences, 15(16), 8939. DOI: 10.3390/app15168939.
  21. Domżalska, Z., Jakubczyk, E. (2025). Characteristics of Food Printing Inks and Their Impact on Selected Product Properties. Foods, 14(3), 393. DOI: 10.3390/foods14030393.
  22. EEA – European Environment Agency (2024). Analysis and data. -- https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/europes-circular-economy-in-facts.
  23. EEA – European Environment Agency (2024). Europe’s circular economy in facts and figures. -- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52019DC0640.
  24. EEA – European Environment Agency Report (11/2024). Trends and projections in Europe 2024. DOI: 10.2800/7574066.
  25. Escudero-Curiel, S., Giráldez, A., Pazos, M., Sanromán, A. (2023). From waste to resource: Valorization of lignocellulosic agri-food residues through engineered hydrochar and biochar for environmental and clean energy applications – A comprehensive review. Foods, 12(19), 3646. DOI: 10.3390/foods12193646.
  26. European Commission – Biomethane Factsheet (2023). -- https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/bioenergy/biomethane_en.
  27. European Commission – Pact for skills annual report (2024). Progress on Upskilling and Reskilling the European.
  28. European Commission (2019). EU Actions Against Food Waste. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety.
  29. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2025). The Clean Industrial Deal: A Joint Roadmap for Competitiveness and Decarbonization.
  30. European Commission. Pact for Skills: About the initiative. European Union (2024). -- https://pact-for-skills.ec.europa.eu/about_en.
  31. European Commission-COM(2019). 640 final, Brussels. -- https://eurlex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0006.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
  32. Eurostat (2024). Farmers and the agricultural labour force – statistics explained. European Union. -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/.
  33. Eurostat (2025). Regions in Europe – Agriculture statistics. European Union. -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/regions-2024.
  34. Fan, H., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Jiang, J., Waheed, A., Wang, S., Majid, S., Zhang, L., Zhang, R. (2023). Effects of organic fertilizer supply on soil properties, tomato yield, and fruit quality: A global meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2556. DOI: 10.3390/su15032556.
  35. FAO (2013). Food wastage footprint Impacts on natural resources. Summary report.
  36. FAO (2015). Climate change and food security. risks and responses. FAO, 110.
  37. FAO (2023). Most of the 9.1 million farms in the EU are family-run. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations -- https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1682074.
  38. Farrell, M., Griffith Gareth, W., Hobbs, P. J., Perkins, W. T., Jones, D. L. (2009). Microbial diversity and activity are increased by compost amendment of metal-contaminated soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 71(1), 94-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00793.x.
  39. Fernandes, F., Delerue-Matos, C., Grosso, C. (2025). Unveiling the potential of agrifood by-products: A comprehensive review of phytochemicals, bioactivities and industrial applications. Waste Biomass Valor, 16, 2715-2748. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-024-02622-0.
  40. Filiciotto, L., Rothenberg, G. (2020). Biodegradable plastics: Standards, policies, and impacts. Advanced Energy Materials, ChemSusChem, Batteries & Supercaps, 14(1), 56-73. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202002044.
  41. Ford, S., Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573-1587. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150.
  42. Grant, M. J., Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 89-168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
  43. Gross, A., Bromm, T., Glaser, B. (2021). Soil organic carbon sequestration after biochar application: A global meta-analysis. Agronomy, 11(12), 2474. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11122474.
  44. Haupt, M., Hellweg, S. (2019). Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 1-2, 100005. DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2019.100005.
  45. He, Z., Ding, B., Pei, S., Cao, H., Liang, J., Li, Z. (2023). The impact of organic fertilizer replacement on greenhouse gas emissions and its influencing factors. Science of The Total Environment, 905, 166917. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166917.
  46. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024). Data and statistics -- https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/interactive-map-of-global-biogas-and-biomethane-potential.
  47. ISPRA (2024). Environmental Indicators Database update. A key tool for outlining a com-prehensive and detailed picture of the State of the Environment in Italy.
  48. ISPRA (2023). Institute for Environmental Protection and Research. Municipal Waste Report.
  49. Jeníček, L., Malaťák, J., Velebil, J., Neškudla, M. (2025). Pyrolyzed agro-food by-products: A sustainable alternative to coal. Materials, 18(7), 1495. DOI: 10.3390/ma18071495.
  50. Kamm, B., Kamm, M., Gruber, R. (2005). Biorefinery Industrial Processes and Products – an overview. Biorefineries – Industrial Processes and Products. DOI: 10.1002/9783527619849.ch1.
  51. Karastergiou, A., Gancel, A.-L., Jourdes, M., Teissedre, P.-L. (2024). Valorization of grape pomace: A review of phenolic composition, bioactivity, and therapeutic potential. Antioxidants, 13(9), 1131. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13091131.
  52. Kavitha Shree, G., Arokiamary, S., Kamaraj, M., Aravind J., (2025). Biorefinery approaches for converting fruit and vegetable waste into sustainable products. Journal of Environmen-tal Science and Technology, 22, 7211-7230. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-024-06202-6.
  53. Khattab, M., Yaser, D. (2019). Production and recovery of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate bioplastics using agro-industrial residues of hemp hurd biomass. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 42, 1115-1127. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-019-02109-6.
  54. Korosuo, A., Borzacchiello, M. T., Giuntoli, J., Lasarte Lopez, J., M’barek, R., Mubareka, S. B., Camia, A. (2024). Trends in the EU bioeconomy – update 2024. European Commis-sion. DOI: 10.2760/0141556.
  55. Kramp, T., Kranenburg, R.v., Lange, S. (2013). Introduction to the Internet of Things. Ena-bling Things to Talk. Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40403-0_1.
  56. Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., Zymbler, M. (2019). Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: A review. Journal of Big Data, 6, 111. DOI: 10.1186/s40537-019-0268-2.
  57. Kussainova, G. B., Saghaian, S. H., Reed, M. R. (2021). Innovation behavior of agri-food small and medium-sized enterprises: the case of Europe’s emerging economies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, 24(2).
  58. Lee, R. A., Lavoie, J.-M. (2013). From first- to third-generation biofuels: Challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Animal Frontiers, 3(2), 6-11. DOI: 10.2527/af.2013-0010.
  59. Li, S., Tasnady, D. (2023). Biochar for soil carbon sequestration: Current knowledge, mechanisms, and future perspectives. Journal of Carbon Research, 9(3), 67. DOI: 10.3390/c9030067.
  60. Li, M., Jia, N., Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Wie, L., Jin, Y., Raubenheimer, D. (2022). Global food-miles account for nearly 20% of total food-systems emissions. Nature Food, 3, 445-453. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00531-w.
  61. Ligarda-Samanez, C., Huamán-Carrión, M. L., Calsina-Ponce, W. C., De la Cruz, G., Calde-rón Huamaní, D. F., Cabel-Moscoso, D. J., Garcia-Espinoza, A. J., Sucari-León, R., Aroquipa-Durán, Y., Muñoz-Saenz, J. C., Muñoz-Melgarejo, M., Jilaja-Carita, E. E. (2025). Technological innovations and circular economy in the valorization of agri-food by-products: Advances, challenges and perspectives. Foods, 14(11), 1950. DOI: 10.3390/foods14111950.
  62. Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., Wang, Y. (2017). 3D printing: Printing precision and application in food sector, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 69, 83-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018.
  63. Lucchetta, M., Romano, A., Yorlady Alzate Zuluaga, M., Fornasier, F., Monterisi, S., Pii, Y., Marcuzzo, P., Lovat, L., Gaiotti, F. (2023). Compost application boosts soil restoration in highly disturbed hillslope vineyard. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1289288. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1289288.
  64. Malisic, B., Misic, N., Krco, S., Martinovic, A., Tinaj, S., Popovic, T. (2023). Blockchain adoption in the wine supply chain: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Innovation in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 15(19), 14408. DOI: 10.3390/su151914408.
  65. Marone, A., Varrone, C., Fiocchetti, F., Giussani, B., Izzo, G., Mentuccia, L., Rosa, S., Si-gnorini, A. (2015). Optimization of substrate composition for biohydrogen production from buffalo slurry co-fermented with cheese whey and crude glycerol, using microbial mixed culture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(1), 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.008.
  66. Martin, M., Eldridge, A. L., Hartmann, C., Klassen, P., Ingram, J., Meijer, G. W. (2024). Benefits and challenges of food processing in the context of food systems, value chains and sustainable development goals. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 153, 104703. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104703.
  67. Mathur, R., Srivastava, V. K. (2019). Crop residue burning: Effects on environment. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3272-2_9.
  68. Merino, D., Quilez-Molina, A. I., Perotto, G., Bassani., Spigno, G., Athanassiou, A. (2022). A second life for fruit and vegetable waste: a review on bioplastic films and coatings for potential food protection applications. Green Chemistry, 24, 4703-4727. DOI: 10.1039/D1GC03904K.
  69. Molina, A., Cortés, D., Chairez, I., Alfaro-Ponce, M., Alvarez, M. M., Trujillo de Santiago, G. (2024). Comprehensive sustainable development of a multifunctional machine: 3D food printer and didactic platform. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 17(1), 413-428. DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2024.2355895.
  70. Möller, K., Müller, T. (2012). Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12(3), 242-257. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201100085.
  71. Monforti Ferrario, F., Scarlat, N., Fahl, F., Lugato, E., Dallemand, J. F. (2018). Potential of energy production from agricultural residues in Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. -- http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-10076-10001.
  72. National Agency for Agricultural Mechanization (ENAMA) (2010). Renewable energy from biomass. Study and Documents, Case Study No. 5. -- https://www.progettobiomasse.it/it/casi.php.
  73. Neri, A., Bernardi, B., Zimbalatti, G., Benalia, S. (2023). An overview of anaerobic digestion of agricultural by-products and food waste for biomethane production. Energies, 16(19), 6851. DOI: 10.3390/en16196851.
  74. Nilsen-Nygaard, J., Fernández Noriega, E., Radusin, T., Rotabakk Tore, B., Sarfraz, J., Sharmin, N., Sivertsvik, M., Sone, I., Pettersen Kvalvåg, M. (2021). Current status of biobased and biodegradable food packaging materials: Impact on food quality and effect of innovative processing technologies. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 20(2), 1333-1380. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12715.
  75. Pawankumar, R., Mehrotra, S., Priya, S., Gnansounou, E. D., Sharma, S. K. (2021). Recent advances in the sustainable design and applications of biodegradable polymers. Bioresource Technology, 325, 124739. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124739.
  76. Qasim Ali, M., Ahmad, N., Akmal Azhar, M., Munaim, M. S. A., Hussain, A., Mahdi, A. A. (2024). An overview: exploring the potential of fruit and vegetable waste and by-products in food biodegradable packaging. Discover Food, 4, 130. DOI: 10.1007/s44187-024-00117-4.
  77. Rana, R. L., Bux, C., Lombardi, M. (2023). Carbon footprint of the globe artichoke supply chain in Southern Italy: From agricultural production to industrial processing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 391, 136240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136240.
  78. Reduce Food Loss & Waste (2025). -- https://drawdown.org/explorer/reduce-food-loss-waste.
  79. REPowerEU with clean energy, Publications Office of the European Union (2022). -- https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/528866.
  80. Ryals, R., Whendee, L. S. (2013). Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecological Applications, 23(1), 15-69. DOI: 10.1890/12-0620.1.
  81. Senga, R., Nasr, M., Fujii, M., Abdelhaleem, A. (2024). Sustainable valorization of agricul-tural waste into bioplastic and its end-of-life recyclability for biochar production: Econom-ic profitability and life cycle assessment. Chenosphere, 369, 143847. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143847.
  82. Siciliano, S., Lopresto, C. G., Lamonaca, F. (2024). From traditional packaging to smart bio-packaging for food safety: A review. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 9, 1971-1986. DOI: 10.1007/s41207-024-00627-8.
  83. Silva, S. d. O., Mafra, A. K. C., Pelissari, F. M., Rodrigues de Lemos, L., Molina, G. (2025). Biotechnology in agro-industry: Valorization of agricultural wastes, by-products and sus-tainable practices. Microorganisms, 13, 1789. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13081789.
  84. Singh, S., Habib, M., Rao, S. E., Kumar, Y., Bashir, K., Jan, S., Jan, K. (2025). A comprehensive overview of biodegradable packaging films: Part I-sources, additives, and preparation method. Discover Food, 5, 41. DOI: 10.1007/s44187-025-00303-y.
  85. Stublić, K., Ranilović, J., Bulatović Ocelić, V., Grgić Kučić, D. (2024). Advancing sustainability: Utilizing bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoate for food packaging. Processes, 12(9), 1886. DOI: 10.3390/pr12091886.
  86. Sun, J., Peng, Z., Yan, L., Fuh, J. Y. H., Hong, G. S. (2015). 3D food printing - An innovative way of mass customization in food fabrication. International Journal of Bioprinting, 1(1), 27-38. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.2015.01.006.
  87. Taalbi, J. (2025). Innovation with and without patents: An information‑theoretic approach. Scientometrics, 130, 4879-4897. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05406-y.
  88. Tan, H. L. (2025). 3D food printing technologies for functional foods: Applications and anti-oxidant integration. Food and Humanity, 5, 100694. DOI: 10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100694.
  89. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2019) 640 final, Bruxelles, 11.12.2019.
  90. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Pe-ters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., Godfrey, C. M., Macdonald, M. T., Langlois, E. V., Soares-Weiser, K., Moriarty, J., Clifford, T., Tunçalp, Ö., Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850.
  91. Tsegaye, B., Jaiswal, S., Jaiswal, A. K. (2021). Food waste biorefinery: Pathway towards circular bioeconomy. Foods, 10, 1174. DOI: 10.3390/foods10061174.
  92. Tubiello, F. N., Karl, K., Flammini, A., Gütschow, J., Obli-Laryea, G., Conchedda, G., Pan, X., Qi, S. Y., Halldórudóttir Heiðarsdóttir, H., Wanner, N., Quadrelli, R., Rocha Souza, L., Benoit, P., Hayek, M., Sandalow, D., Mencos Contreras, E., Rosenzweig, C., Rosero Moncayo, J., Conforti, P., Torero, M. (2022). Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems. Earth System Science Data, 14, 1795-1809. DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-1795-2022.
  93. Tyupova, A., Harasym, J. (2024). Valorization of fruit and vegetables industry by-streams for 3D printing – A review. Foods, 13(14), 2186. DOI: 10.3390/foods13142186.
  94. UN Climate Change (2024). Food loss and waste account for 8-10% of annual global green-house gas emissions, Sep. -- https://unfccc.int/news/food-loss-and-waste-account-for-8-10-of-annual-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-cost-usd-1-trillion.
  95. Verdouw, C. N., Wolfert, S., Beulens, A. J. M., Rialland, A. (2016). Virtualization of food supply chains with the Internet of Things. Journal of Food Engineering, 176, 128-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.009.
  96. Visco, A., Scolaro, C., Facchin, M., Brahimi, S., Belhamdi, H., Gatto, V., Beghetto, V. (2022). Agri-food wastes for bioplastics: European prospective on possible applications in their second life for a circular economy. Polymers, 14, 2752. DOI: 10.3390/polym14132752.
  97. Yadav, K., Jagadevan, S. (2019). Influence of process parameters on synthesis of biochar by pyrolysis of biomass: An alternative source of energy. Recent Advances in Pyrolysis. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88204.
  98. Yaman, S. (2004). Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(5), 651-671. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00177-8.
  99. Yang, J., Mattoo, A. K., Liu, Y., Zvomuya, F., He, H. (2023). Trade-offs of organic and organic-inorganic fertilizer combinations in tomato quality and yield: A global meta-analysis (1992-2021). European Journal of Agronomy, 151, 126985. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126985.
  100. Yogarajan, L., Masukujjaman, M., Ali, M. H., Khalid, N., Osman, L. H., Alam, S. S. (2023). Exploring the hype of blockchain adoption in agri-food supply chain: A systematic literature review. Agriculture, 13, 1173. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13061173.
  101. Zawat, A., Umair, K., Zain, A., Faiza, K. (2025). Plant based ingredients in 3D food printing: A sustainable approach to personalized nutrition. Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences, 10(10), 606-617. DOI: 10.36348/sjls.2025.v10i10.007.
  102. Zhai, X., Xue, Y., Sun, Y., Ma, X., Ban, W., Marappan, G., Tahir, H. E., Huang, X., Wu, K., Chen, Z. (2025). Colorimetric food freshness indicators for intelligent packaging: Pro-gress, shortcomings, and promising solutions. Foods, 14(16), 2813. DOI: 10.3390/foods14162813.
  103. Zhang, J., Wu, H. (2025). Valorization of bioactive compounds from food by-products using supercritical fluid extraction: A technological and industrial perspective. Food Chemistry, 484, 144277. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144277.
  104. Zhang, N., Ye, X., Gao, Y., Liu, G., Liu, Z., Zhang, Q., Liu, E., Sun, S., Ren, X., Jia, Z., Siddique Kadambot, H. M., Zhang, P. (2023). Environment and agricultural practices regulate enhanced biochar-induced soil carbon pools and crop yield: A meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 905(20), 167290. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167290.
  105. Zhong, L., Lewis, J. R., Sim, M., Bondonno, C. P., Wahlqvist, M. L., Mugera, A., Hodgson, J. M. (2023). Three-dimensional food printing: its readiness for a food and nutrition insecure world. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 82(4), 468-477. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665123003002.
  106. Zhou, Q., Nan, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, L., Chen, J., Li, J., Wang, H., Ruan, Z. (2023). Effect of 3D food printing processing on polyphenol system of loaded aronia melanocarpa and post-processing evaluation of 3D printing products. Foods, 12(10), 2068. DOI: 10.3390/foods12102068.
  107. Zink, T., Geyer, R. (2017). Circular economy rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 593-602. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12545.