Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
logo

Articles

No. 1 (2026)

The impact of environmental tax and emission trading system on environmental quality in OECD countries

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/epe2026oa22889
Submitted
maggio 26, 2026
Published
2026-06-09

Abstract

Achieving sustainability requires a coherent policy mix to address the climate change problem. To internalize the cost of carbon emissions resulting from the existing mode of production, central market-based mechanisms, such as carbon taxes and emissions trading systems (ETS), can be applied. Nevertheless, structural and technological context may affect their effectiveness. In this context, the present study tries to assess the impact of carbon pricing instruments on CO₂ emissions while explicitly accounting for the structural and technological framework by integrating energy intensity and the usage of low-carbon energy in the energy mix, using a dynamic panel approach based on the Generalized Method of Moments for 31 OECD countries over the period 1997-2020.

The results show that the implementation of carbon taxes or ETS does not have a statistically significant impact on emission reductions. However, combining the two instruments alongside a higher penetration of low-carbon energy sources leads to a significant decline in emissions. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of economic instruments should be combined with complementary structural and technological transformations. An integrated policy mix that simultaneously promotes energy efficiency and accelerates the transition toward low-carbon energy systems may be embedded with carbon pricing.

References

  1. Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1-30. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20170144.
  2. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  3. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
  4. Bai, J., Ru, H. (2024). Carbon emissions trading and environmental protection: International evidence. Management Science, 70(7), 4593-4603. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.03143.
  5. Bargaoui, S. A., Liouane, N., Nouri, F. Z. (2014). Environmental impact determinants: An empirical analysis based on the STIRPAT model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 449-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.489.
  6. Bargaoui, S. A., Nouri, F. Z. (2017). Dynamic panel data analysis of CO2 emissions driving forces. Journal of Economics Studies and Research, 1-18. DOI: 10.5171/2017.947798.
  7. Bartram, S. M., Hou, K., Kim, S. (2022). Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), 668-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.015.
  8. Bashir, M. F., Ma, B., Bilal, F., Komal, B., Bashir, M. A. (2021). Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 20700-20716. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-12123-x.
  9. Bashir, M. F., MA, B., Shahbaz, M., & Jiao, Z. (2020). The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions, with the roles of environmental technology and financial development. PLOS One, 15(11), e0242412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242412.
  10. Bayer, P., Aklin, M. (2020). The European Union emissions trading system reduced CO₂ emissions despite low prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8804-8812. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918128117.
  11. Ben-David, I., Jang, Y., Kleimeier, S., Viehs, M. (2021). Exporting pollution: Where do multinational firms emit CO2?. Economic Policy, 36(107), 377-437. DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiab009.
  12. Bian, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, B., Jiao, J. (2024). A green path towards sustainable devel-opment: The impact of carbon emissions trading system on urban green transformation development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 140943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140943.
  13. Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080.
  14. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321-340. DOI: 10.1080/07474930008800475.
  15. Bushnell, J. B., Chong, H., Mansur, E. T. (2013). Profiting from regulation: Evidence from the European carbon market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 78-106. DOI: 10.1257/pol.5.4.78.
  16. Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173-191. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00470.
  17. Chameides, W., Oppenheimer, M. (2007). Carbon trading over taxes. Science, 315(5819), 1670. DOI: 10.1126/science.1138299.
  18. Clò, S. (2009). The ETS reform and carbon leakage: Economic analysis of the new ETS Di-rective. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1375544.
  19. Dogan, E., Hodžić, S., Fatur Šikić, T. (2022). A way forward in reducing carbon emissions in environmentally friendly countries: The role of green growth and environmental taxes. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5879-5894. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2039261.
  20. Ellerman, A. D., Marcantonini, C., Zaklan, A. (2016). The European Union emissions trading system: ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), rev014. DOI: 10.1093/reep/rev014.
  21. Geng, Y. (2024). The effectiveness of EU ETS on the Environment: Assessing the Impact of Emissions Trading Systems on Carbon Emissions in OECD Countries: A 1995-2016 Analysis.
  22. Gujarati, D. N. (2002). Basic Econometrics. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education.
  23. Hájek, M., Zimmermannová, J., Helman, K., Rozenský, L. (2019). Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries. Energy Policy, 134, 110955. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110955.
  24. Halkos, G. E. (2003). Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environment and Development Economics, 8(4), 581-601. DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X0300317.
  25. He, P., Ya, Q., Chengfeng, L., Yuan, Y., Xiao, C. (2021a). Nexus between environmental tax, economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from China, Finland, and Malaysia based on a Panel-ARDL approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(3), 698-712. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1658068.
  26. He, Y., Wen, C., Zheng, H. (2021b). Does China’s environmental protection tax law effectively influence firms? Evidence from stock markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(15), 4436-4447. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1822810.
  27. Hoffmann, V. H. (2007). EUs and investment decisions: The case of the German electricity industry. European Management Journal, 25(6), 464-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.008.
  28. International Carbon Action Partnership (2021). Emissions Trading Worldwide. Status Report 2021.
  29. International Energy Agency (2024). Energy Efficiency 2024 (Licence CC BY 4.0). -- https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/f304f2ba-e9a2-4e6d-b529-fb67cd13f646/EnergyEfficiency2024.pdf.
  30. International Energy Agency (2025). World energy outlook 2025 (Licence CC BY 4.0). -- https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/81980a53-9716-47f1-904e-b92a2c4d2ea4/WorldEnergyOutlook2025.pdf.
  31. International Monetary Fund (2019). Fiscal monitor: How to mitigate climate change. Inter-national Monetary Fund.
  32. IRENA (2018). Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050 (Transformation énergétique mondiale: une feuille de route pour 2050). Agence internationale de l’énergie renouvelable, Abu Dhabi.
  33. Jebli, M. B., Youssef, S. B., Ozturk, I. (2016). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecological Indicators, 60, 824-831. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031.
  34. Ji, X., Wu, G., Lin, J., Zhang, J., Su, P. (2022). Reconsider policy allocation strategies: A review of environmental policy instruments and application of the CGE model. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116176.
  35. Jung, H., Song, C. K. (2023). Effects of the emission trading scheme (ETS) on the change rate of carbon emissions. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 912. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28154-6.
  36. Kill, J., Ozinga, S., Pavett, S., Wainwright, R. (2010). Trading Carbon: How it Works and Why it is Controversial. FERN.
  37. Kosonen, K., Nicodème, N. (2009). The Role of Fiscal Instruments in Environmental Policy. Brussels: European Union Working Paper.
  38. Levine, R., Loayza, N., Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(1), 31-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00017-9.
  39. Mardones, C., Flores, B. (2018). Effectiveness of a CO2 tax on industrial emissions. Energy Economics, 71, 370-382. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.018.
  40. Martin, R., Muûls, M., De Preux, L. B., Wagner, U. J. (2014). On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Ecological Economics, 105, 78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010.
  41. Metcalf, G. E. (2019). On the economics of a carbon tax for the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 50(1), 405-484.
  42. Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(3), 395-418. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X.
  43. Morales-Lage, R., Bengochea-Morancho, A., Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2016). The Determinants of CO2 Emissions: Evidence from European Countries (No. 2016/04).
  44. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., Kutner, M. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  45. Nordhaus, W. D. (2017). Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7), 1518-1523. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1609244114.
  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1975). The Polluter Pays Princi-ple: Definitions and Implementation. OECD Publishing. -- https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/1975/01/the-polluter-pays-principle_g1gh8f8f/9789264044845-en.pdf.
  47. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2023). Methodological guidelines for environmentally related tax revenue accounts. OECD. -- https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/10/methodological-guidelines-for-environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts_e6bc5aaa/d752d120-en.pdf.
  48. Ouyang, X., Fang, X., Cao, Y., Sun, C. (2020). Factors behind CO2 emission reduction in Chinese heavy industries: do environmental regulations matter?. Energy Policy, 145, 111765. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111765.
  49. Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., Gupta, R. (2017). The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Energy Economics, 66, 360-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.025.
  50. Radulescu, M., Hossain, M. R., Alofaysan, H., Si Mohammed, K. (2025). Do emission trading systems, green technology, and environmental governance matter for environmental quality? Evidence from the European Union. International Journal of Environmental Research, 19(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s41742-024-00667-6.
  51. Rennert, K., Errickson, F., Prest, B. C., Rennels, L., Newell, R. G., Pizer, W., Kingdon, C., Wingenroth, J., Cooke, R., Parthum, B., Smith, A., Waldhoff, S. (2022). Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO₂. Nature, 610, 687-692. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9.
  52. Roodman, D. (2007). A short note on the theme of too many instruments. Center for Global Development Working Paper, 125(10.2139).
  53. Sarıgül, S. S., Topcu, B. A. (2021). The impact of environmental taxes on carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 3(1), 43-54.
  54. Schmalensee, R., Stavins, R. N. (2017). Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1). DOI: 10.1093/reep/rew017.
  55. Shafiei, S., Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064.
  56. Tajudeen, I. A., Wossink, A., Banerjee, P. (2018). How significant is energy efficiency in mitigating CO2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Economics, 72, 200-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.010.
  57. Telatar, O. M., Birinci, N. (2022). The effects of environmental tax on Ecological Footprint and Carbon dioxide emissions: A nonlinear cointegration analysis on Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(29), 44335-44347. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18740-y.
  58. Vedung, E. (2025). Carrots, sticks, and sermons: The triad and the book. Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation, 21(50), 55-62. -- http://www.jmde.com.
  59. Yao, X., Shah, W. U. H., Yasmeen, R., Zhang, Y., Kamal, M. A., Khan, A. (2021b). The impact of trade on energy efficiency in the global value chain: A simultaneous equation approach. Science of The Total Environment, 765, 142759. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142759.
  60. Yao, X., Yasmeen, R., Hussain, J., Shah, W. U. H. (2021a). The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efficiency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and Next 11 countries. Energy, 223, 120063. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120063.
  61. York, R., Rosa, E. A., Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351-365. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5.
  62. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.GDP.PUSE.KO.PP.KD.
  63. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.COMM.FO.ZS.
  64. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.GHG.CO2.PC.CE.AR5.
  65. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KN.
  66. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.
  67. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS.
  68. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-tax-trading-coverage.
  69. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-low-carbon-energy.
  70. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/environmental-tax.html.