Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Economia e diritto del terziario - Open Access - Dal 2018 non è più pubblicata da FrancoAngeli

Articoli

No. 1 (2017): Economia e diritto del terziario

x

Submitted
settembre 7, 2017
Published
2017-09-07

Abstract

Installations that should be reactivated, art-works made with materials that degrade rapidly or constantly evolving: many of the new expressions of contemporary art have made more complex the relationship between the artist and the artwork. So that the artist is called upon to intervene constantly on his creation.
What should be the assumptions to activate the action to protect the integrity of the work if the artist has predicted that the work should change over time? What new legal basis for the denial statement in case of ephemeral and in-becoming creation if the artwork is improperly preserved or reactivated? And, on the other hand, what are the limits of the owner’s right to protect the identity and integrity of the work initially purchased or to destroy the work which wants to get rid?
Protection of the integrity, guarantee of authenticity, right to disregard and right of destruction: it is outlined a new relationship between copyright and ownership’ rights, where the real property right seems to mitigate its characteristic of absoluteness in the face of survival most significant intake artist’s creative.
It comes from this reality the necessity of redefining the principles and the criteria of the protection for artworks of contemporary art. Necessary an adjustment of the notion of safeguard, integrity, authenticity, conservation and restoration is needed.

References

  1. Benichu, A., (dir.), Ouvrir le document, Paris, Les Presses du Réel, 2010.
  2. Benichiu, A., Recréer/scripter – Mémoires et transmissions des œuvres performatives et chorégraphiques contemporaines, Paris, Les Presses du Réel, 2015.
  3. Buskirk, M., The Contingent Object of Contemporay Art, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2005.
  4. Buskirk, M., Creative Entreprise. Contemporary Art between Museum and Marketplace, London-New York, Continuum, 2012.
  5. Christov-Bakargiev, C., The Dance was Very Frenetic, Lively, Rattling, Clanging, Rolling Contorted, and Lasted for a Long Time, in The Books of Books, Catalogo dOCUMENTA (13), Ostfildern, HatJe Cantz, 2012.
  6. Couture, F. e Gagnier, R., Les valeurs de la documentation muséologique: entre l’intégrité et les usages de l’oeuvre d’art, in A. Benichou (dir.), Ouvrir le document, Paris, Les Presses du Rèel, 2010, p. 323.
  7. De werra J., L’authentification des oeuvres d’art et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle, in M.-A. Renold, P. Gabus, J. de Werra, L’expertise et l’authentification des oeuvres d’art, Genève, Schulthess, 2007.
  8. Donati, A., Law and Art, diritto civile e arte contemporanea, Milano, Giuffré, 2012.
  9. Donati, A., I contratti degli artisti, nuovi modelli di trattativa, Torino, Giappichelli, 2012.
  10. Donati, A., Autenticità, Authenticity, Authenticité. Archivi d’artista e autenticità dell’opera: necessità di prassi virtuose tra lacune ed incertezze del diritto e del mercato, in «Riv. dir. civ.», 2015, p. 987.
  11. Frasco, L., The Contingency of Conservation: Changing Methodology and Theoretical Issues in Conserving Ephemeral Contemporary Artworks with Special Reference to Installation Art, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.
  12. Grün, M., My workisn’t ephemeral, it’s precarious. Discussion of a ‘Conservation’ Strategy for Doppelgarage by Thomas Hirschhorn, in T. Scholte, G. Wharton, Inside Installations. Theories and Practice in the Care of Complex Artworks, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p. 221.
  13. Heinich, N., Le paradigme de l’art contemporain. Structures d’une révolution artistique, Paris, Gallimard, 2014.
  14. Horowitz, N., Art of the Deal: Contemporary Art in a Global Financial Market, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2011.
  15. Lippard, L. R., Six Years: The dematerialization of the art object from 1966 to 1972, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1973.
  16. Neuenolf, H., Collectors Alarmed as Gerhard Richter Disowns Early Works from West German Period, in https://news.artnet.com/, 21 luglio 2015.
  17. Noordegraaf, J., Saba, C. G., Le Maitre, B. e Hediger, V. (eds.), Preserving and exhibiting media art, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2013.
  18. Poinsot, J.-M., Quand l’oeuvre a lieu: l’art exposé et ses récits autorisés, Villeurbanne, Art Edition, 1999.
  19. Rebentisch, J., Asthetics of Installation Art, Berlin, Sternberg Press, 2012.
  20. Scholte, T. e Wharton, G., Inside Installations. Theories and Practice in the Care of Complex Artworks, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011.
  21. Sterpi, M., Restauro dell’arte contemporanea e diritto: ruoli limiti e conseguenze, in M. C. Mundici, A. Rava, Cosa Cambia. Teorie e pratiche del restauro nell’arte contemporanea, Milano, Skira, 2013, p. 167.
  22. Van Saaze, V., Installation Art and the Museum. Presentation and Conservation of Changing Artworks, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2013.
  23. Wharton, G., The Challenges of conserving contemporary art, 2005, in B. Altshuler, Collecting the New: Museums and Contemporary Art, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2005; anche in http://www.inside-installations.org.