Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

V. 16 N. 1 (2026)

Human Capital Performance Beyond the Standard: Parenting and New Sustainability Indicators in the Banking Sector

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2026oa22769
Inviata
maggio 12, 2026
Pubblicato
2026-06-19

Abstract

This study examines the use of innovative Social Key Performance Indicators in the sustainability disclosure of an Italian Banking Group. Moving beyond compliance, can provide evidence of tangible corporate welfare and societal change. New metrics will be introduced gradually. Firstly, the number of newborns, will be assessed. The goal is to optimize business strategy, enabling organizations to refine their approaches based on real-time impact data and creating medium to long-term policies, aligning the new indicator with existing KPIs that shift the focus from the time of birth alone to effective support. The “Methodology for Standardized and Accountable Aggregation of HR-Derived Sustainability Data” has been defined to transform entity-level HR input into a comparable and auditable ESG KPI (newborn), ensuring consistency across the Group despite non-consolidated data generation. This study highlights how the use of the KPI “Newborn” strengthens accountability and transparency, providing evidence for stakeholders regarding the effectiveness of social initiatives.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Ahmed, A., Pereira, L., Jane, K. (2024) Mixed Methods Research: Combining both qualitative and quantitative approaches, Civil Engineer and Researcher, Tunneling and Trenchless Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, 10444.
  2. Alemu, B. A. (2025). Cultivating a Culture of Sustainability: The Role of Organizational Values and Leadership in Driving Sustainable Practices. Business Ethics and Leadership.
  3. Cunha, F., Dinis-Carvalho, J., & Sousa, R. M. (2023). Performance measurement systems in continuous improvement environments: Obstacles to their effectiveness. Sustainability, 15(1), 867.
  4. Cunha, F., Dinis-Carvalho, J., & Sousa, R. M. (2024). Assessment of performance measurement systems’ ability to mitigate or eliminate typical barriers compromising organisational sustainability. Sustainability, 16(5), 2173.
  5. Corporate sustainability reporting directive 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending NFRD 2014/95/EU, Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU.
  6. Omnibus Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2026/470.
  7. Gebhardt, M., Thun, T., Seefloth, M., & Zülch, H. (2022). Managing sustainability ‒ Does the integration of environmental, social and governance key performance indicators in the internal management systems contribute to companies' environmental, social and governance performance. Business Strategy and the Environment.
  8. Baldini, M., Maso, L.D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., Terzani, S. (2018). Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1): 79-98.
  9. Bravo, F., Reguera‐Alvarado, N. (2019). Sustainable development disclosure: Environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2): 418-429.
  10. Carroll, A.B., Shabana, K.M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105.
  11. Chow, E. D. (1982). Developing Key Performance Indicators for Organizational Success. Journal of Business Strategy.
  12. Dincer, B., Dincer, C. (2024). Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(2): 68.
  13. EFRAG (2022). European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) Exposure Drafts.
  14. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1).
  15. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.
  16. Kaplan, R. S.., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business Review Press.
  17. Marr, B. (2012). Key Performance Indicators (KPI): The 75 measures every manager needs to know. Pearson Education Limited, Financial Time Series.
  18. Mediocredito Centrale (2025). Consolidated Sustainability Reporting: https://www.mcc.it/bilanci-financial-statements/.
  19. Miles, K. (2011). Embedding gender in sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1): 139-146.
  20. Nguyen, M. S. (2024). Knowledge management in banking: a bibliometric literature review. Knowledge and Performance Management.
  21. Pasban, M., & Nojedeh, S. H. (2016). A Review of the Role of Human Capital in the Organization. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences.
  22. Serpeninova, Y., Partila, P., Raboshuk, A., Krukhmal, O., & Nezhyd, Y. (2025). Transparency in Human Capital Disclosure in Non-Financial Reporting: Towards Ethical Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Banking. Business Ethics and Leadership.
  23. Sun, Y., Davey, H., Arunachalam, M., Cao, Y. (2022). Towards a theoretical framework for the innovation in sustainability reporting: An integrated reporting perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
  24. UN Women (2021). Gender equality: Why it matters for development.
  25. Velasco‐Balmaseda, E., De Celis, I.L., Izaguirre, N.E. (2024). Corporate social responsibility as a framework for gender equality: Mapping of gender equality standards for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3).
  26. Yadav, S. (2023). Gender Equality as a Tool for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Teaching, Learning and Education, 2(2).
  27. Zacharenko, E. (2024). European Union gender equality and work-life balance policies: managing tensions between the demands of production and reproduction. European Journal of Politics and Gender. Briston University Press.