Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

V. 10 N. 1 (2025)

Analysis of the institution of parole in the context of criminal law theory and practice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19392
Inviata
febbraio 13, 2025
Pubblicato
2025-06-25

Abstract

In modern criminal legal systems, the institution of parole is an important element aimed at the rehabilitation of convicts and their social adaptation. The purpose of the study is to study the theoretical and practical problems associated with its application, including issues of legal guarantees and the effectiveness of the institute as a whole.

The article uses a comprehensive approach that includes an analysis of current legislation, judicial practice, as well as a sociological study of the opinions of practicing lawyers and representatives of the penitentiary system.

The authors propose a number of recommendations for improving the institution of parole, including clarifying legislative norms, increasing transparency and predictability of court decisions, as well as strengthening the role of preventive and rehabilitative measures for convicts. The implementation of the proposed measures will balance the interests of society and the rights of convicts, as well as increase the effectiveness of the institution of parole in the rehabilitation of criminals.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Altman M.C. (2023). Introduction: Punishment, Its Meaning and Justification. In: Altman M.C. (eds). The Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment. Palgrave Handbooks in the Philosophy of Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-11874-6_1.
  2. Ashirbekov A.I. (2008). The appointment of a more lenient punishment than is provided for this crime: Dis. ... kand. jurid. sciences. ‒ Karaganda, pp. 194-205.
  3. Borchashvili I. S. (2021). Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The general part. Vol. 1. Almaty: Zhety Jargy, pp. 836-850.
  4. Council of Europe Publications (2002). Improving the Implementation of the European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures. -- Text available at the website:https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/improving-implementation-european-rules-community-sanctions-and?utm.
  5. Criminal Code of the Kazakh SSR (1959). -- Text available at the website: https://online.zakon.kz.
  6. Dzhumashev G. S. (2017). The mechanism of application of parole in the Republic of Kazakhstan: the state and problems of improvement. Bulletin of KazNU named after Al-Farabi. The series is legal, 2(82): 113-116.
  7. Hritz A. (2021). Parole Board Decision Making and Constitutional Rights. In: Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 17, pp. 335-351, 2021, -- Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3946923 or DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051121-070621.
  8. Lapshin V. F. (2015). Parole as an integral part of the institution of release from criminal punishment. Differentiation and individualization of responsibility in criminal and penal enforcement law. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of L. L. Kruglikov. Ryazan: Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, pp. 118-126.
  9. Low A., & Rogers P. (2019). The role of parole in modern criminal justice systems. Cambridge University Press, 25(1): 112-120.
  10. Normative decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2015). On the judicial practice of parole from serving of sentence, replacing the unserved part of sentence with more lenient punishment and reducing the term of the inflicted penalty. -- Text available at the website: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/P150000006S.
  11. Recommendation Rec (2003). 22 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on conditional release (parole). -- Text available at the website: https://rm.coe.int/16800ccb5d?utm_source.
  12. Regulatory Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2015). On judicial practice of conditional early release from serving a sentence, replacement of the unserved part of the sentence with a lighter type of punishment and reduction of the term of the imposed punishment. -- Text available at the website: https://online .zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33291078#activate_doc=2.
  13. Smith B. (2010). Chronology of the Prisoner Movement in Australia -- https://justiceaction.org.au/chronology-of-the-prisoner-movement-in-australia.
  14. Skakov A. B. (2004). Progressive system of execution of imprisonment and its reflection in the new legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Almaty, pp. 152-162.
  15. Sungmoon K. (2018). State Coercion and Criminal Punishment, Democracy after Virtue: Toward Pragmatic Confucian Democracy, Studies in Comparative Political Theory (New York, online edn, OxfordAcademic, DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190671235.003.0005.
  16. The concept of legal policy until 2030 (2021).Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. -- Text available at the website: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/U2100000674.
  17. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2014) -- https://online.zakon.kz.
  18. Tokubaev Z. S. (2007). The type of punishment in the form of imprisonment and its impact on convicts. In: 10 years of the Criminal Code and the Penal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: achievements and prospects: international mater. scientific and practical. conf.. Karaganda: B. Beisenov of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 1, pp. 121-125.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...