Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

V. 10 N. 1 (2025)

Indicators for assessing sustainable development goals in education and their monitoring in Kazakhstan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19388
Inviata
febbraio 12, 2025
Pubblicato
2025-06-25

Abstract

Within the framework of the concept and goals of sustainable development, significant attention is paid to education for sustainable development. However, due to the diversity of national education systems, both in structure and in the content of educational programs, it is difficult to correctly compare the achievements of different countries and monitor their progress in achieving sustainable development goals at the national and international levels without appropriate comparison. In this article, the authors analyzed the leading national models of education, which are the most “mature” and developed, with an emphasis on sustainable development. The authors pay special attention to the education system of Kazakhstan, its features in comparison with these models, as well as consideration of initiatives aimed at achieving sustainable development goals in education, which are integrated into national projects and other strategic and program documents of Kazakhstan.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Aleixo A. M., Leal S., and Azeiteiro U. M. (2021). Higher education students' perceptions of sustainable development in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429.
  2. Allen K., Metternich G., Wittman T. (2019). Prioritization of SDG goals: assessment of baselines, gaps and relationships. Sustain Sci, 14: 421-438.
  3. Argento D., Einarson D., Mortensson L., Persson K., Wendeen K., and Westergren A. (2020). Integrating sustainability into higher education: The case of Sweden. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(6): 1131-1150. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-10-2019-0292.
  4. Bespalyy S. (2023). E3S Web of Conferences 390, 01012(2023). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202339001012.
  5. Bespalyy S. (2023). IOP Conf. Ser., Earth Environ. Sci., 1231 012077.
  6. Bespalyy S., Akhrorova A., Alnazarova G., Adieva A., Petrenko A. (2024). Education for sustainable development: comparative analysis and prospects at universities in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. Discov Sustain, 5(140). DOI: 10.1007/s43621-024-00343-x.
  7. Blasco N., Brusca I. and Labrador M. (2021). Factors facilitating university contributions to sustainable development goals: an analysis of Spanish public universities. Sustainability, 13(1), 89. DOI: 10.3390/su13010089.
  8. Diaz-Sarachaga J.M., Jato-Espino D., Castro-Fresno D. (2018). Are the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) index an adequate basis for measuring progress in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda?. Sustain Dev, 26: 663-671.
  9. D’Adamo I., Gastaldi M., Imbriani C., and Morone P. (2021). Assessing regional performance for sustainable development goals in Italy. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03635-8.
  10. EUROSTAT (2017). Sustainable development in the European Union: a report on monitoring progress towards the SDGs in the context of the EU. Eurostat, Luxembourg.
  11. Gilles-Domenech D., Magomedova N., Sanchez-Alcazar E. J., and Lafuente-Lechuga M. (2021). Integrating sustainability into the business administration and management curriculum: A sustainability competency map. Sustainability, 13(16), 9458. DOI: 10.3390/su13169458.
  12. Glavic P. (2020). Identifying key issues in education for sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland). DOI: 10.3390/su12166500.
  13. Janssens L., Kuppens T., Mula I., Staniskiene E., and Zimmermann A. B. (2022). Does the European quality framework support the integration of transformative learning for sustainable development in higher education?. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8): 148-173. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0273.
  14. Jensen D., Campbell J. (2019). Discussion paper. Arguments in favor of a digital ecosystem for the environment: combining data, algorithms and ideas for sustainable development. -- Available at: https://un-spbf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Digital-Ecosystem-final.pdf.
  15. Lafortyun G., Fuller G., Berman Diaz L., Cloquet-Lesh A., Kunduri P. and Riccaboni A. (2022). Achieving the SDGs: the European Compass in a multipolar world. European Sustainable Development Report 2022, Paris.
  16. Momete D.K. and Momete M.M. (2021). Map and track the effectiveness of education for sustainable development in the European Union. Sustainability, 13(23), 13185. DOI: 10.3390/su132313185.
  17. Res G. and Schultz F. (2021). Sustainable development in Europe: a multi-criteria analysis of solutions. Income and Wealth Review, 67(2): 509-529. DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12475.
  18. Ricciolini E., Rocchi L., Cardinale M., Paolotti L., Ruiz F., Caballe J. M. and Bogin A. (2022). Assessing progress towards achieving the SDGs using multi-criteria methods based on multiple control points: a study of European countries. Research on social indicators, 162(3): 1233-1260. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-022-02886-w.
  19. Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll K., Texoz K., Durand-De la cr D., Sachs J.D. (2017). National baseline data on Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG index and monitoring panels. Nat Geosci, 10: 547.
  20. UN (2019b). Ninth meeting of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Indicators of Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals on March 26-28, 2019 United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, Beirut, Lebanon.
  21. Wen Al momani a (2019). Incentives and Barriers to participation in Environmental monitoring and Information systems: Critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environ Sci Policy, 101: 341-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...