Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sustainability Governance: Legal, Economic, and Institutional Mechanisms"

No. 2 Thematic Issue (2025): Thematic Issue Sustainability Governance: Legal, Economic, and Institutional Mechanisms, Guest Editors: Karlis Ketners, Vitalii Kotsur

Foreign Persons in Kazakhstan’s Civil Proceedings and the Sustainability of the Civil Justice System

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa21086
Submitted
23 settembre 2025
Published
30-12-2025

Abstract

International organisations and cross-border mobility are driving up civil conflicts involving foreigners in Kazakhstan, challenging the capacity, inclusiveness, and predictability of national civil justice. This article analyses the legal status and procedural rights of foreign citizens and stateless persons in civil actions under Kazakhstani law in the context of sustainable legal growth. The study uses a dialectical approach and normative and comparative legal analysis of the Civil Procedure Code, private international law rules, and relevant international instruments governing court access, judgement recognition and enforcement, and legal assistance. Persistent shortcomings in institutional resilience include fragmented jurisdictional regulations, inconsistent service standards abroad, language and cost constraints, and inadequate digital accessibility for cross-border litigants. Addressing these issues through improved connectivity, recognition procedures, translation and fee-waiver safeguards, e-justice tools, and treaty alignment would improve fairness, efficiency, and non-discrimination. Strengthening foreign people’ procedural status can boost societal trust, investment climate, and the rule of law while complying with international responsibilities. A more resilient and sustainable civil justice system in Kazakhstan can be achieved by embedding principles of accessibility, transparency, equality before the law, and effective remedy into proceedings involving foreign persons. The article proposes incremental legislative and institutional reforms that are timely and necessary.

References

  1. Akimbekova, M., Akimbekova, S., Moroz, S. (2021). Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions of Foreign Courts and Arbitrations in The Republic of Kazakhstan: Current Status and Problems. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(SpecialIssue-1): 1-7.
  2. Apakhayev, N., Madiyarova, A.S., Aigarinova, G., Ryskaliyev, D.U., Buribayev, Y.A., Khamzina, Z.A. (2017). Current trends of legal regulation of relationships in the social protection sphere. Man in India, 97(11): 221-231.
  3. Bharti, S.S. (2022). Central Asia as a region in international relations. Reality of Politics, 20: 15-27.
  4. Brownlow, P., Hilton, M. (2021). Peter Brownlow and Mark Hilton look at the advantages of the English Courts as a forum for deciding International IP disputes. -- https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2021/uk/%20advantages-of-the-english-courts-as-a-forum-for-deciding-international-ip-disputes.
  5. Butler, W.E. (2021). Proceeding on cases with the participation of foreign persons in international procedure law of Russia and Belarus. State and Law, 10: 173-185. Doi: 10.31857/S102694520017271-9.
  6. Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2015). -- https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1500000377.
  7. Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2017). -- https://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/199/200/644.html.
  8. Clifford, M. (2019). Jurisdictional gateways – English court’s jurisdiction in breach of contract dispute. Hill Dickinson. -- https://www.hilldickinson.com/insights/articles/jurisdictional-gateways-english-courts-jurisdiction-breach-contract-dispute.
  9. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (1995). -- https://www.akorda.kz/en/constitution-of-the-republic-of-kazakhstan-50912.
  10. European Justice (2022). How to bring a case to court? -- https://e-justice.europa.eu/34/EN/how_to_bring_a_case_to_court?CZECH_REPUBLIC&member=1.
  11. Fan, Z. (2025). Promoting Cities’ Sustainable Development via Access to Justice: Observations on the Jurisdiction of Chinese Mainland. Chinese Journal of Transnational Law. Doi: 10.1177/2753412X251351993.
  12. Fedorchenko, N.V., Shymon, S.I., Vyshnovetska, S.V., Mikhnevych, L.V., Bazhenov, M.I. (2020). Community Organisation as a Subject of Civil Relations According to Law of Ukraine and CIS Countries. Memoria e Ricerca, 1: 353-370. Doi: 10.4478/98143.
  13. Hague Convention on Civil Procedure (1954). -- https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=33.
  14. Hellner, M. (2002). The limits to judicial cooperation in civil matters: Taking legality seriously. Riga: Riga Graduate School of Law.
  15. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). -- https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights.
  16. Khamzin, A.S., Khamzina, Z.A., Buribayev, Y.A., Tileubergenov, Y.M., Ibraimov, D.A., Yermekov, A.T. (2016). International legal aspects of exercising refugees’ rights in Central Asia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 7(4): 835-841. Doi: 10.14505/jarle.v7.4(18).15.
  17. Khamzin, A.Sh., Khamzina, Zh.A., Buribayev, Y.A. (2015). The decent work programme of Kazakhstan: Social and labor rights protection from an institutional aspect of international law. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 8(2): 539-540.
  18. Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Almaganbetov, P., Tazhmagambet, A., Samaldykova, Z., Apakhayev, N. (2020). Labor disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of legal regulation and future prospects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(1): 1-14.
  19. Lavinbuk, A. (2005). Rethinking early judicial involvement in foreign affairs: an empirical study of the Supreme Court’s Docket. Yale Law Journal, 114(4): 855-904.
  20. Law of Georgia No. 2045-II “On the Legal Status of Aliens and Stateless Persons” (2014). -- https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/view/2278806?publication=12.
  21. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 2337 “On the Legal Status of Foreigners” (1995). -- https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1003764&pos=2;-90#pos=2;-90.
  22. Legal Status of Foreigners in the Kyrgyz Republic (2011). -- https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/legal-status-of-foreign-nationals-in-the-kyrgyz-republic-4891.
  23. Lisitsa, V., Moroz, S. (2019). Legal regulation of public-private partnership in Russia and other countries of the Eurasian economic union. Russian Law Journal, 7(3): 53-81. Doi: 10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-53-81.
  24. Liu, G. (2020). Principles of treatment and legal status of foreigners. In: Chinese Refugee Law (pp. 102-160). Leiden: Brill, Nijhof. Doi: 10.1163/9789004412187_004.
  25. Mahmutovic, A., Alhamoudi, A. (2024). Understanding the Relationship between the Rule of Law and Sustainable Development. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(1): 170-197. Doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-7.1-a000102.
  26. Mills, A. (2024). Sustainability and Jurisdiction in the International Civil Litigation Market. Journal of Private International Law, 20(1): 1-25. Doi: 10.1080/17441048.2024.2347717.
  27. Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters (1993). -- https://cisarbitration.com/2017/02/03/minsk-convention-on-legal-assistance-and-legal-relations-in-civil-family-and-criminal-matters/.
  28. Muidenova, A., Issayeva, Z.А. (2019). Representation of foreign persons in civil proceeding. News of the National Academy of Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Social and Human Sciences, 5(327): 229-233. Doi: 10.32014/2019.2224-5294.193.
  29. Muidenova, A.K., Seriyev, B.A., Zhusupbekova, M.K. (2020). Comparative characteristics of some issues on proceeding of cases with participation of foreign persons in international civil procedure law of Kazakhstan and Russia. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 3(331): 37-45. Doi: 10.32014/2020.2518-1483.53.
  30. Okosa, C. (2022). Costs in Civil Proceedings. Geneva: Opinio Juris.
  31. Ospanova, D., Moroz, S., Niyazova, A. (2024). Legal obligations of a lawyer and standards for the protection of minors in juvenile justice. Social and Legal Studios, 7(4): 231-239. Doi: 10.32518/sals4.2024.231.
  32. Prince, R., Usorova, G. (2019). Jurisdiction of the English Courts over foreign disputes: How wide will the net now be cast? -- https://www.shlegal.com/news/jurisdiction-of-the-english-courts-over-foreign-disputes-how-wide-will-the-net-now-be-cast.
  33. Rachman, F. (2021). The protection of foreigners in international law. Journal La Sociale, 2(1): 18-24. Doi: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v2i1.264.
  34. Rexhepi, B.R., Murtezaj, I.M. (2024). Visa liberalisation and labour migration: Legal and economic implications for Kosovo. Social and Legal Studios, 7(2): 19-27. Doi: 10.32518/sals2.2024.19.
  35. Roper, S. (2019). Applying universal jurisdiction to civil cases: Variations in state approaches to monetizing human rights violations. Global Governance, 24(1): 103-118.
  36. Sabitova, A. (2016). Legal status of foreigners: International legal and domestic aspects. Bulletin of KazNPU named after Abai. Series of International Life and Politics, 2(45): 13-16.
  37. Shchukin, A.I. (2018). The principles of justice delivery in civil cases involving foreigners. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 5: 94-107.
  38. Smashnikova, T.B. (2018). Features of administrative and legal status of foreigners in Japan. Actual Issues of Modern Science and Society, 4: 27-29.
  39. Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2023). Legal assistance in civil cases. -- https://sud.gov.kz/rus/content/pravovaya-pomoshch-po-grazhdanskim-delam.
  40. Talzhanov, K. (2014). General problems of representing foreign persons in civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan. -- https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=34613338&pos=1;-16#pos=1;-16.
  41. The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No.488-V “On arbitrage” (2016). -- https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1600000488.
  42. Tsurkan-Saifulina, Y.V., Vitman, K.M., Kolodin, D.A. (2019). Certain aspects of interaction between the state and civil law in CIS countries. Asia Life Sciences, 2: 697-717.
  43. Yuxin, N., Chang, L. (2023). A major amendment to provisions on foreign-related civil procedures is planned in China. -- https://conflictoflaws.net/2023/a-major-amendment-to-provisions-on-foreign-related-civil-procedures-is-planned-in-china/.
  44. Zhanibekov, A.K., Burkitbekkyzy, B.S., Tursunovna, A.G., Dulatovich, K.M., Alua, M., Beaver, K.M. (2024). The utility of Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy in predicting being processed through the criminal justice system. Journal of Crime and Justice. Doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2024.2422505.