Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

Online First

Methods of Forensic Psychological Examination of Convicts to Enhance Sentencing Probation and Social Sustainability in the Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19296
Submitted
30 gennaio 2025
Published
07-08-2025

Abstract

Sentencing probation in Kazakhstan, aimed at reintegrating convicts into society, faces challenges such as recidivism and evasion, undermining social sustainability. Forensic psychological examinations can address these issues by assessing convicts’ behavior and risks.

The aim is to select methods of forensic psychological examination, specifically the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), to enhance sentencing probation, reduce recidivism, and promote sustainable social reintegration in Kazakhstan.

An observational study is utilized PAI, a multiscale questionnaire assessing psychopathology, stress coping, interpersonal relationships, and forensic constructs like aggression and substance abuse. Results were interpreted to develop individualized probation recommendations.

Results evidence the absence of legislated psychological assessment methods in Kazakhstan necessitates tools like PAI, which is time-efficient (344 items, 40-50 minutes) and assesses key constructs: alcohol and substance abuse, aggression, recidivism risk, simulation, and positive impression management. The aggression scale consistently predicts violent behavior, supporting targeted interventions.

In conclusion, integrating PAI into probation control enhances social reintegration, reduces recidivism, and aligns with sustainable development goals (SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions). Legislative adoption of PAI is recommended to standardize forensic psychological assessments.

References

  1. Brundtland G.H. (1987). Our Common Future. United Nations.
  2. Committee on Legal Statistics, Republic of Kazakhstan (2024). -- Retrieved from https://gis.kgp.kz.
  3. Edens J.F., & Boccaccini M.T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab”. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599. Doi: 10.1037/pas0000475.
  4. Gardner B.O., Boccaccini M.T., Bitting B.S., & Edens J.F. (2015). Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 534. Doi: 10.1037/pas0000065.
  5. Kellogg S.H., Ho A., Bell K., et al. (2002). The Personality Assessment Inventory drug problems scale: A validity analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79(1): 73-84. Doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7901_05.
  6. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 38-VI SAM (2016). On Probation. -- Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1600000038.
  7. Newberry M., & Shuker R. (2012). Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) profiles of offenders and their relationship to institutional misconduct and risk of reconviction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(6), 586-592. Doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.669220.
  8. Paulino M., Edens J.F., Moniz M., Moura O., Rijo D., & Simoes M.R. (2024). Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in forensic and correctional settings: A comprehensive review. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 103: 1-10.
  9. Reidy T.J., Sorensen J.R., & Davidson M. (2016). Testing the predictive validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in relation to inmate misconduct and violence. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 871. Doi: 10.1037/pas0000224.
  10. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. -- https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  11. Urazalin B.T., Begaliev E.N., Mukanov M.R., & Imashev B.M. (2024). Prevention of self-mutilation and suicide among persons in minimum-security correctional institutions in Kazakhstan. Forensic Medicine, 10(2): 210-219. Doi: 10.17816/fm16084.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...