Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)

Neuromarketing and Sustainability: Understanding Implicit Bias to Promote Sustainable Eating Habits

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19243
Submitted
22 gennaio 2025
Published
25-06-2025

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the added value of neuromarketing techniques, specifically the Implicit Association Test (IAT), in analyzing consumer implicit biases toward sustainability foods, particularly insects. While edible insects are part of the culinary tradition in many Eastern countries, their consumption remains limited in Western cultures. Despite the well-known environmental and sustainability benefits of such foods, various studies have demonstrated that strong cultural barriers hinder their adoption.
By testing 200 participants through explicit questionnaires and the IAT, this research highlights the differences and convergences between these two methodologies in understanding consumer perceptions of edible insects. The results reveal a convergence between explicit and implicit attitudes, emphasizing the strength of implicit biases. The IAT proves to be a fundamental tool in accessing the unconscious dimensions of perception, providing valuable insights for marketing strategies aimed at promoting sustainable food choices.

References

  1. Bruno N., Guerra G., Alioto B.P., Jacomuzzi A.C. (2024). Shareability: novel perspective on human-media interaction. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1106322.
  2. Carpenter T. P., Pogacar R., Pullig C., Kouril M., Aguilar S., LaBouff J., Isenberg N., Chakroff A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5): 2194-2208. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3.
  3. Ceriani L. (2018). Edible insects: Nutritional properties and their potential as future food. Journal of Future Food Studies, 12(3): 45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001.
  4. Edwards A. L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden Press.
  5. EFSA Scientific Committee (2015). Scientific opinion on a risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA Journal, 13(10), 4257. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257.
  6. Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E., Schwartz J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6): 1464-1480. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
  7. Grimm P. (2010). Social desirability bias in survey research: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10): 967-971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.013.
  8. Jacomuzzi A.C. (2024). The perception of vaccine effectiveness in the medical field. Sistemi Intelligenti, 36. DOI: 10.1422/113326.
  9. Jacomuzzi A.C., Alioto B.P. (2024). People and machines in communication. Studies in psychology, 45. DOI: 10.1177/02109395241241380.
  10. Jacomuzzi A.C., Milani Marin L.E. (2023). Body in the forefront, again? Distance learning drawbacks and implications for policy. Frontiers in Education, 8. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1247670.
  11. Jacomuzzi A.C. (2022). Thinking strategies and misunderstandings when talking about vaccines. Sistemi Intelligenti, 34. DOI: 10.1422/105044.
  12. Köster E. P. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 20(2): 70-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002.
  13. Milani Marin L.E., Snjiez J.O.S.P, Jacomuzzi A.C. (2021). Insects as food: Knowledge, desire and media credibility. Ideas for a communication. Rivista di studi sulla sostenibilità, 2. DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002025.
  14. Milani Marin L.E., Jacomuzzi A.C. (2022). Interactions and social identity of support teachers: An ethnographic study of the marginalisation in the inclusive school. Frontiers in Education, 7. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.948202.
  15. Milani Marin L.E., Jacomuzzi A.C. (2020). Insects at the table: What consumers know. Rivista di studi sulla sostenibilità, 1. DOI: 10.3280/RISS2020-001011.
  16. Nosek B. A., Hawkins C. B., & Frazier R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4): 152-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005.
  17. Ordoñez-Araque R., & Egas-Montenegro E. (2021). Edible insects: A food alternative for the sustainable development of the planet. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 23, 100304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100304.
  18. Van Huis A. (2013). Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 563-583. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...