Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

Online First

Immigration-Migration and Ecological Human Imprint Philosophy and Life Prospective

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19626
Submitted
7 marzo 2025
Published
26-03-2025

Abstract

This study examines the ecological human imprint of migration and immigration, emphasizing the impacts of human population growth on global sustainability. As the world population surpassed eight billion in 2022, resource depletion, environmental degradation, and socio-economic challenges have intensified.
Migration and immigration, while offering economic opportunities, also strain receiving countries’ natural resources, infrastructures, and social fabrics. The paper introduces the Ecological Human Imprint Migration and Consequence Process (EHIMCP) model, which assesses migration’s effects on ecological sustainability, economic stability, and societal balance. Key findings suggest that population growth exacerbates poverty, environmental degradation, and political tensions, necessitating sustainable policies and strategic resource management. The study underscores the urgency of balancing human population dynamics with environmental capacity to ensure long-term global stability.

References

  1. Akpuokwe C. U., Eneh N.E., Adeniyi A.O., Bakare S.S. (2024). Migration trends and policies: a review of African and USA perspectives. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3): 212-224. Doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.851.
  2. Bashir D., Giovanni J.D., Philpott D., El-Shazli H. F. (2021) Meeting about Religious Freedom in the Middle East. Council on Foreign Relations. -- https://www.cfr.org/event/religious-freedom-middle-east. Accessed on September 9, 2024.
  3. Batalova J. (2022). Top statistics on global migration and migrants. Migration Policy Institute. -- www.migrationinformation.org.
  4. Bech E.C., Borevl Borevi K., Mouritsen P. (2017). A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(7). Doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7.
  5. Bowen A., Cochrane S. and Fankhauser S. (2012). Climate change, adaptation and economic growth. Climatic Change, 113: 95-106. Doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0346-8.
  6. Brunn S. (eds). The Changing World Religion Map. Dordrecht: Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_17.
  7. Claval P. (2015). Religions and Ideologies. In: Brunn S. (eds). The Changing World Religion Map. Dordrecht: Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_17.
  8. El-Damanhouri (2013). Establishing a Brilliant Argument for The Demolition of The Churches of Egypt and Cairo. El-Nour Book Store, Al-Mansoura Province. Egypt, 138 pp.
  9. FAO (1960-2008). FAOSTAT FAO Statistical Database-Data Series 1960-2008. Food and Agriculture Organization, UN, -- www.fao.org, Rome, Italy.
  10. FAO (2008). FAOSTAT Data Series. Food and Agriculture Organization, UN, -- www.fao.org, Rome, Italy.
  11. Harper S (2022). What Is Urban Encroachment? -- https://www.sciencing.com/info-8758278-urban-encroachment/.
  12. Hines C. (2018). Immigration and population: The interlinked ecological crisis that dares not speak its name. The Ecological Citizen, 2: 51-5.
  13. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2023). Migrants, Refuges, and Societies. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433.
  14. Maja M.M., Ayano S.F. (2021). The impact of population growth on natural resources and farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries. Earth Syst Environ, 5: 271-283. Doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00209-6.
  15. McAuliffe M. and Oucho L A. (eds.) (2024). World Migration Report 2024. International Organization for Migration (IOM), Geneva.
  16. Perlmutter T. (1996). Bringing Parties Back. In Comments on ‘Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic Societies’. International Migration Review, 30(1): 375-388. doi: 10.1177/019791839603000141.
  17. Rashid T. (2019) Islam and the dilemmas of religious freedom. -- https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2019/09/islam-and-the-dilemmasof-religious-freedom/. Accessed on September 9, 2024.
  18. Richmond A. (1994). Global apartheid. Refugees, racism and the New World order. Oxford University Press.
  19. Sciortino G. (2000) Toward a Political Sociology of Entry Policies: Conceptual Problems and Theoretical Proposals. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(2): 213-228. doi: 10.1080/13691830050022776.
  20. Shakir Hanna S.H. and Osborne-Lee I.V. (2011). Sustainable economy of the ecological footprint: economic analysis and impacts. Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, VIII(313): 313-326. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 144, www.witpress.com. doi: 10.2495/ECO110281.
  21. Shakir Hanna S. H., Harris K. T., Osborne Lee I. W., Cesaretti G. P., Misso R., and Anreopoulou Z. S. (2014). Global Ecological Human Imprint, Sustainable Development and Environment: Assessment and Impacts. European Journal of Sustainable Development (2014), 3(3): 1-24. Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n3p1.
  22. Shakir Hanna S.H, Obiomon P., Osborne-Lee I. W., Cesaretti G.P., Misso R. (2019). Global Solar Energy availability model and use in relationship to Ecological Human imprint: Economic Sustainability Impact and Assessment. Renewable Energy and Power Quality, 17(4). DOI: 10.24084/repqj17.363.
  23. SPSSSCIENC (2002). Sigmaplot Version 8. SPSSSCIENCE -- www.spssscience.Com/sigmaplot.
  24. SPSSSCIENC (2009-2010). SigmaPlot 11.2. User’s Guide Part 1. by System Software. 890 + index 50 pp.
  25. SPSSSCIENC (2009-2010). SigmaPlot 11.2. User’s Guide Part 2 Statistics by System Software.564 pp.
  26. STELLA (2001). An Introduction to System Thinking by Barry Richmond. High-Performance Systems, Inc. High-Performance Systems, Inc. The System Thinking Company.
  27. UNDP (2013). The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. Human Development Report 2013. The United Nations Development Programme. Gilmore Printing Services Inc., Canada 216 pp.
  28. UNEP (2009). A Planet in Ecological Debt, Arendal Maps and Graphics Library: UNEP -- http://maps. grida.no/go/graphic/a-planet-in-ecological-debt.
  29. UNFPA (2001). The State of World Population 2001.
  30. Van Hear N. and Crisp J. (1998) Refugee protection and immigration control: addressing the asylum dilemma. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 17(3): 1-27.
  31. Van Hear N. (2006). I went as far as my money would take me: conflict, forced migration, and class. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society Working Paper No. 6, University of Oxford, 2004, 36pp.
  32. Veil S. (1978). Human rights, ideologies, and population policies. Population and Development Review, 4(2): 313-321.
  33. Vogt Isaksen J. (2019). The impact of the financial crisis on European attitudes toward immigration. Comparative Migration Studies (CMS) 7(24). Doi: 10.1186/s40878-019-0127-5.
  34. Whitaker S. D. (2019). What is “economic migration,” and why is it important enough for economists to study? -- (clevelandfed.org).
  35. Wikipedia Org. (2025). The Free Encyclopedia. Ideology. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/ Accessed on January 25, 2025.
  36. WorldBank 1960-2012. Data Series and Research. The World Bank organization. -- http://data.worldbank.Org/topic/agriculture-and-rural-development.
  37. WorldBank 1960-2008. Data Series and Research. The World Bank -- worldbank.org/topic/ agriculture-and rural-development.
  38. WRI 1960-2005 Series. Earth Trends Environmental Information, World Resource Institute (WRI). World Resource Institute: WRI -- http://Earthtrends.wri.org/.
  39. WRI (2000). World Resources 2000-2001-People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life. World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington DC, USA.
  40. WRI (2012). U.S. Drought Demonstrates Complexity, Severity of Water Risk by Robert Kimball. -- http://www.wri.org/search/site/Robert%2520Kimball%2520and%2520drought.
  41. WWF (2002). The Global Conservation Organization, Living Planet report/footprint.
  42. WWF (2002). Living Planet Report 2002, World Wide Fund for Nature. (WWF) -- http://www.panda.org/livingplanet, Geneva, Switzerland.
  43. WWF (2002). Living Planet Report 2002 Edited by Jenkins M., Jakubowska J., Gaillard V., Groombridge B., M. WackernagelMonfreda, C., Deumling D., Gurarie E., Friedman S., Linares A.C., Sánchez, M.A.V., Falfán I.S.L., Loh, J. Randers., S.J. and C.Monfreda, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), -- www.panda.org, International. Avenue du Mont-Blanc, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland.
  44. WWF (2004). Living Planet Report 2004, Worldwide Fund for Nature International (WWF), Global Footprint Network, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. http://www.panda.org/livingplanet.
  45. WWF (2006). Living Planet Report 2006, World Wide Fund (WWF) for Nature, Gland, Switzerlandhttp://www.panda.org/livingplanet.
  46. WWF (2008). Living Planet Report 2008. Edited by Humphrey S., Chapagain A., Bourne G., Mott R., Oglethorpe J., Gonzales A., Atkin M., Loh J., Collen B., McRae L., Carranza T.T., Pamplin F.A., Amin R., Baillie J.E.M., Goldfinger S., Wackernagel M., Stechbart M., Rizk S., Reed A., Kitzes J., Peller A., Niazi S., Ewing B., Galli A., Wada Y., Moran D., Williams R., Backer W.D., Hoekstra A.Y. and Mekonnen, M., World Wide Fund (WWF), www.panda.org, International Avenue du Mont-Blanc 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
  47. WWF (2010). Living Planet Report. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy/Center for International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University, 2010. 2010 Environmental Performance Index, -- http://epi.yale.edu/Home.
  48. WWF (2012). Living Planet Report 2012. Biodiversity, biocapacity, and better choices. Editor in chief: Monique Grooten. Lead editors: Rosamunde Almond and Richard McLellan. Editorial team: Nigel Dudley, Emma Duncan, Natasja Oerlemans, and Sue Stolton.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...