Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)

Towards a Sustainable Penitentiary System: Education, Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice in the 2030 Agenda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/riss2025oa19385
Submitted
11 febbraio 2025
Published
28-05-2025

Abstract

The Prison System is a key element of Criminal Justice, but it has numerous critical issues related to overcrowding, structural deficiencies and the difficulty of implementing effective re-education programs. This article analyzes the role of detention not only as a punitive measure, but as an opportunity for the rehabilitation and social reintegration of prisoners. Through the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, in particular with Goals 4, 10 and 16, the importance of a fair and sustainable approach to the Prison System is highlighted. Innovative strategies, including education, vocational training, and psychological support, are explored to reduce recidivism and promote restorative justice. The article proposes a critical and constructive vision on prison policies, emphasizing the need for structural reforms that guarantee respect for human rights and collective security.

References

  1. Abdel-Salam S., & Kilmer A. (2023). ‘A Prison Is a Prison’: Perspectives From Incarcerated Men on the Therapeutic and Punitive Aspects of Halden Prison in Norway. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(4): 929-947.
  2. Archibong B., & Obikili N. (2023). Prison labor: The price of prisons and the lasting effects of incarceration (No. w31637). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  3. Artyukhov A., Volk I., Surowiec A., Skrzypek-Ahmed S., Bliumska-Danko K., Dluhopolskyi O., & Shablystyi V. (2022). Quality of education and science in the context of Sustainable Development Goals ‒ From Millennium Goals to Agenda 2030: Factors of innovation activity and socio-economic impact. Sustainability, 14(18), 11468.
  4. Atuase D., & Filson C. K. (2024). Availability and accessibility of academic library resources and services for prison inmates in the distance education programme. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(1), 102816.
  5. Barros Filho A. D. D., Leite C., & Monteiro A. M. R. (2023). Education policies in prisons: an analysis focused on the 10 largest prison populations. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 28, e280069.
  6. Basilisco S. (2024). Educazione continua degli Adulti e il Trattamento Rieducativo: modelli, interventi e ruoli educativi in carcere. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 22(45): 195-203.
  7. Bertaccini D. (2021). Fondamenti di critica della pena e del penitenziario. Bononia University Press.
  8. Bosma A. K., Groenhuijsen M. S., & de Vries M. (2021). Victims’ participation rights in the post-sentencing phase: The Netherlands in comparative perspective. New journal of European criminal law, 12(2): 128-145.
  9. Bozzuto P. (2022). Sport, spazio e società: una riflessione progettuale a partire dal carcere. Territorio, 102(3): 21-25.
  10. Castro-Martínez A. M. (2021). La calidad de la educación en centros penitenciarios de la Unión Europea.¿ Una utopía en la agenda 2030?. Revista de Estudios Europeos, 77: 5-21.
  11. Cavotta V., & Rosini M. (2021). Carcere, lavoro e impresa sociale, 60.
  12. Chiola G. (2022). Il sistema carcerario e le “sue catene”. In Catene/Chains, Società di Studi Geografici. Memorie Geografiche (Vol. 21, pp. 281-285). Società di Studi Geografici.
  13. Colglazier W. (2015). Sustainable development agenda: 2030. Science, 349(6252), 1048-1050.
  14. Conway P. F. (2024). ‘Education changes a person’: exploring student development in a college-in-prison program through critical andragogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(8): 2008-2024.
  15. Della Bella A. (2018). Riforma dell’ordinamento penitenziario: le novità in materia di assistenza sanitaria, vita detentiva e lavoro penitenziario. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo, 2018.
  16. Della Casa F., Glauco G., Stefania C., Grazia C. M., Lina C., Daniele V., ... & Marcello B. (2023). Manuale di diritto penitenziario. G Giappichelli Editore.
  17. Della Morte G. (2013). La situazione carceraria italiana viola “strutturalmente” gli standard sui diritti umani (a margine della sentenza “Torreggiani c. Italia”). Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, (1): 147-158.
  18. Fabris M. A., & Longobardi C. (2023). Towards 2030: Sustainable Development Goal 16: Peace, justice, and strong institutions. An educational perspective. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 1130832). Frontiers Media SA.
  19. Giordano F., Perrini F., Langer D., Pagano L., & Siciliano G. (2017). L’impatto del teatro in carcere: Misurazione e cambiamento nel sistema giudiziario. EGEA spa.
  20. Giuseppini M. A., & Infurna M. R. (2021). Uno sguardo oltre le mura. Contesti penitenziari e gruppoanalisi: quando pensare il cambiamento diventa possibile. Scritti di gruppo 2.0, 37.
  21. Herold E., Wicker P., Czyrnick-Leber U., Gröben B., & Dransmann M. (2023). Sport in prison: social and subjective health outcomes of different sport programs. International Journal of Prisoner Health (ahead-of-print).
  22. Hogan E., Li R., Soosai Raj A. G., Griswold W. G., & Porter L. (2024). Challenges and Approaches to Teaching CS1 in Prison. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 512-518).
  23. Hope Sr K. R. (2020). Peace, justice and inclusive institutions: overcoming challenges to the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16. Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1): 57-77.
  24. Imandeka E., Putra P. O. H., Hidayanto A. N., & Mahmud M. (2024). Exploring the World of Smart Prisons: Barriers, Trends, and Sustainable Solutions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, (1), 6158154.
  25. Ismail N., Lazaris A., O’Moore É., Plugge E., & Stürup-Toft S. (2021). Leaving no one behind in prison: improving the health of people in prison as a key contributor to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals 2030. BMJ Global Health, 6(3), e004252.
  26. Kemp T., & Tomczak P. (2024). The cruel optimism of international prison regulation: prison ontologies and carceral harms. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(3): 1683-1714.
  27. Latino F., & Tafuri F. (2024). Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning. Medicina, 60(2), 216.
  28. Libbrecht M. L., Delheye P., Meek R., & Roose R. (2024). Scoping review on the use and meaning of sport in prison and after detention. Journal of Prison Education Research, 8(1), 7.
  29. Lovecchio N., Zago M., & Mainardi L. (2022). Progettare e monitorare l’attività motoria in spazi difficili. Territorio, 102(3): 41-45.
  30. Martens S., & Crewe B. (2024). Feeling (un) safe in prison: a comparative analysis of England & Wales and Norway. The British Journal of Criminology, azae064.
  31. Martinez R., Lima J., & Celes L. (2023). When service design meets social impact: Process and mindset used to contribute to the public policy to reduce the overpopulation in Brazil’s Prison. In Service Design and Innovation Conference (pp. 663-690).
  32. Martufi A. (2024). Social Rehabilitation, European Penology, and Supranational Courts: Is Judicial Activism a Driver for Penal Change?. In Social Rehabilitation and Criminal Justice (pp. 103-125). Routledge.
  33. Menghini A. (2024). L’esecuzione della pena in carcere tra teoria e prassi. Incontri e percorsi, 4: 193-202.
  34. Müller J., Meek R., Blessing J., & Mutz M. (2023). Prisoners’ educational experiences in five different prison sports programmes: A research note. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(10): 2290-2298.
  35. Norman M., Sonoda J., & Ricciardelli R. (2024). Sport, physical activity, and young people who are incarcerated: a scoping review. Youth Justice, 14732254231220594.
  36. Organizzazione delle Nazioni Unite O. (2015). Trasformare il nostro mondo: l’Agenda 2030 per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile. Risoluzione adottata dall’Assemblea Generale il, 25.
  37. Pech L. (2022). Lo stato di diritto come principio consolidato e ben definito del diritto dell’UE. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(2): 107-138.
  38. Rantanen T., Järveläinen E., & Leppälahti T. (2021). Prisoners as users of digital health care and social welfare services: A Finnish attitude survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5528.
  39. Rautanen M., Harald K., & Tyni S. (2024). Health and Wellbeing of Prisoners 2023: The Wattu IV Prison Population Study Finland.
  40. Rosati F., & Vaccarelli F. (2024). Il diritto allo studio in carcere–situazione attuale e prospettive: il caso del Polo Universitario Penitenziario di Castrogno-Teramo. In Diritti umani, giustizia sociale e principi di sostenibilità. Profili interdisciplinari per la complessità dei mutamenti epocali. Ricerche & Redazioni.
  41. Santoro E. (2022). Il reinserimento sociale: antidoto per una comunità escludente. La Nuova Giuridica, 1(1): 105-122.
  42. Sempé G. (2021). Le sport carcéral chez les «courtes peines»: Une approche comparative franco-canadienne en prisons pour femmes. Esporte e Sociedade, (04).
  43. Svensson B. (2021). The power of biography: Criminal policy, prison life, and the formation of criminal identities in the Swedish welfare state. In Auto/ethnography (pp. 71-104). Routledge.
  44. Testa D. (2010). Storia e modelli del sistema carcerario in Italia. Attività motoria nelle carceri italiane: il ruolo dell’educatore fisico, la sindrome ipocinetica e l'esperienza di Fossombrone. (Scaffale aperto), 1000-1011.
  45. van de Rijt J., van Ginneken E., & Boone M. (2023). Lost in translation: The principle of normalisation in prison policy in Norway and the Netherlands. Punishment & Society, 25(3): 766-783.
  46. van Zijl-Smit D., & Dünkel F. (Eds.) (2021). Imprisonment today and tomorrow: International perspectives on prisoners’ rights and prison conditions. Brill.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...