Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Papers

N. 2 (2025): Social participation and contemporary scenarios: transformations, representations, and psychosocial impacts in territories

Political Representation and Action: Conceptions of Political Participation Among Youth in Bogotá and Naples in Comparative Perspective

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/psc2025oa21760
Inviata
22 dicembre 2025
Pubblicato
30-12-2025

Abstract

The research aims to investigate the co-constructed social representations of political participation that circulate among different groups of young Italian and Colombian university students and to verify whether there are correlations between social representations, political participatory behaviour, perceived anomie and self-efficacy. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, it was possible to reach a total sample of 327 students from Naples and 370 students from Bogotá, divided into three subgroups based on “political orientation”: young people on the right, young people on the left, and young people who are not affiliated with any political party. The internal structure of social representations was reconstructed using the hierarchical evocation technique. The content of the representations studied was operationalised using specific psychometric scales. Right-wing young people exhibit a very traditional view of political participation. Italian young people tend to emphasise the positive aspects of participation, whereas Colombian young people associate it with a negative connotation. Left-wing young people, both Neapolitan and Bogotano, are very active in demonstrations and actions aimed at change: the latter also emphasise their ability to influence the socio-political fabric. Young people who claim not to identify with any political party or faction have a strong distrust of their respective state institutions, as well as traditional representative bodies. The students involved in the study, regardless of their nationality and political orientation, showed great interest in participating. The results obtained so far provide important insights into how young people participate in politics and the meanings they attribute to it.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Abric, J. C. (2003). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des representations sociales. In J.C. Abric (Ed.). Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 59-80). Érès.
  2. Alonso, D., & Brussino, S. (2019). Involucramiento político y representaciones sociales de la democracia en Argentina. Psicologia & Sociedade, 31, 1-19. Doi: 10.1590/1807-0310/2019v31192956.
  3. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Keeter, S., & Zukin, C. (2002). Searching for the meaning of youth civic engagement: notes from the field. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 189-195. Doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_5.
  4. Aríza Santamaría, R. & Velásquez Bonilla, E.S. (2020). La violencia estatal frente a la protesta social: el escuadrón móvil anti-disturbios (ESMAD) en Colombia. Revista Jurídica Derecho, 9(13), 19-38.
  5. Bardin, L. (1998). L’analyse de contenu. Presses Universitaires de France.
  6. Barile, A. (2024). La protesta debole: I movimenti sociali in Italia dalla Pantera ai No global (1990-2003). Mimesis.
  7. Barrett, M. (2007). Children’s Knowledge, Beliefs and Feelings about Nations and National Groups. Hove: Psychology PressBruno, D., & Barreiro, A. (2014). La política como representación social. Psicología Política, 48, 69-80. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/103949.
  8. Bruno, D., & Barreiro, A. (2020). Cognitive polyphasia, social representations and political participation in adolescents. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(1), 18-29. Doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09521-8.
  9. Bruno, D., & Barreiro, A. (2021). La política en la vida cotidiana de los y las adolescentes: representaciones sociales, prácticas políticas y polifasia cognitiva. In Hacía una dialéctica entre individuo y cultura: en la construcción de conocimientos sociales (pp. 137-162). Miño y Dávila. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/172146.
  10. Bruno, D.S., Barreiro, A., & Kriger, M. (2011). Representaciones sociales de la política en los jóvenes: Corrupción institucional y mentira. KAIROS. Revista de Temas Sociales, 28, 1-16.
  11. Buhagiar, L. J., & Sammut, G. (2020). ‘Social re-presentation for…’: An action-oriented formula for intergroup relations research. Frontiers in Psychology. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 11, 352. Doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.00352.
  12. Bynner, J., & Ashford, S. (1994). Politics and participation: some antecedents of young people’s attitudes to the political system and political activity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 223-236. Doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240202.
  13. Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Capanna, C., & Mebane, M. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 1002-1020. Doi: 10.1002/ejsp.604.
  14. Cárdenas, M., Parra, L., Picón, J., Pineda, H., & Rojas, R. (2007). Las Representaciones Sociales de la Política y la Democracia. Ultima Década, 15(26), 53-78. Doi: 10.4067/s0718-22362007000100004.
  15. Censis (2024). La società italiana al 2024. Centro Studi Investimenti Sociali. https://www.censis.it/sites/default/files/downloads/Sintesi%20Fenomenologico%202024.pdf.
  16. Cini, L., & Guzmán-Concha, C. (2017). Student movements in the age of austerity. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 1-20. Doi: 10.1080/14742837.2017.1331122.
  17. Corbetta, P., Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (2009). Between ideology and social representations: Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and the meaning of the political left and right. European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), 622-641. Doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00845.x.
  18. Cubides, H. (2006). Participación política y organización de jóvenes en Colombia vista desde la tensión “plan de organización-plan de consistencia”. In S. V. Alvarado & P. A.Vommaro (Eds.), Jóvenes, cultura y política en América Latina: algunos trayectos de sus relaciones, experiencias y lecturas (1960-2000) (1st ed., pp. 113-136). Homo Sapiens Ediciones. https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/gt/20120319025640/joven.pdf.
  19. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2020). Social Movements (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  20. Della Porta, D., & Portos, M. (2020). Social movements in times of inequalities: Struggling against austerity in Europe. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 53, 116-126, Doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.01.011.
  21. Donoso, S. (2023). Student movements in Latin America: Pushing the education agenda and beyond. In F. Rossi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Fasanelli, R., Piscitelli, A., & Galli, I. (2020). Social Representations of Covid-19 in the framework of Risk Psychology. Papers on social representations, 29(2), 8.1-8.36. http://psr.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/PSR/index.
  23. Flament, C. (1962). L’analyse de similitude. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche Opérationnelle, 4(2), 63-97.
  24. Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (2021). Youth and politics in times of increasing inequalities. Springer International Publishing.
  25. Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Forrest, S. (2005). Uninterested youth? Young people’s attitudes towards party politics in Britain. Political Studies, 53, 556-578. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00544.x.
  26. Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Wring, D. (2002). A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4, 167-192 Doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00001.
  27. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965-989. Doi: 10.1177/001041402236310.
  28. Howarth, C., Andreouli, E. and Kesi, S. (2014). Social representations and the politics of participation. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, T. Capelos, T. and D. Henk (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology (pp. 19-38). Palgrave.
  29. Huanca, J. W. (2021). El estado de la cuestión sobre la participación política en los jóvenes de la Nación Aymara-Perú. Un diálogo teórico desde sus actores. Apuntes Universitarios, 12(1), 16-52. Doi: 10.17162/au.v11i5.914.
  30. Luna, J. P., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2005). Political representation in Latin America. Party Politics, 11(2), 167-190. Doi: 10.1177/0010414004273205.
  31. Kitanova, M. (2019). Youth political participation in the EU: evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819-836. Doi: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951.
  32. Magallares, A., & Talò, C. (2016). Spanish adaptation of the Participatory Behaviors Scale (PBS). Psychosocial Intervention, 25(1), 39-44. Doi: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.09.003.
  33. Mannarini, T., Buhagiar, L. J., Rochira, A., Avdi, E., Koutri, I., Mylona, A., Sammut, G., & Salvatore, S. (2020). Understanding Political Participation in Media Discourse: A Social Representations approach. Papers on Social Representations, 29(1), 8.1-8.34. https://psr.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/PSR/article/download/541/461.
  34. Markova, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6(4), 419-460. Doi: 10.1177/1354067X0064002.
  35. Márquez, A., Corrochano, M. C., & González, M. R. (2020). Redes sociales (RR.SS.). Tres miradas a la participación de los jóvenes a través de las RR.SS. In J. I. Zaldívar & M. González (Eds.), Participación cívica en espacios socioeducativos. Panorama iberoamericano en un mundo tecnológico (2nd ed., pp. 91-122). FahrenHouse. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=767348.
  36. McCoy, J. (2024) Latin America’s Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Latin American Politics and Society, 66(2), 161-178. Doi: 10.1017/lap. 2024.17.
  37. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. PressesUniversitaires de France.
  38. O’Toole, T. (2003). Engaging with young people’s conceptions of the political. Children’s Geographies, 1, 71-90. Doi: 10.1080/14733280302179.
  39. O’Toole, T., Lister, M., Marsh, D., Jones, S., & McDonagh, A.(2003a). Tuningout or left out? Participation and non-participation among young people. Contemporary Politics, 9, 45-61. Doi: 10.1080/1356977032000072477.
  40. Pozzi, M., Fasanelli, R., Marta, E., Adriano, M., Virgilio, G., Di Taranto A., & Pistoni, C. (2021). Social Representation of Family: A Comparative Study on Italian Young and Older Adults. Journal of Family Issues, 43(3), 752-768. Doi: 10.1177/0192513X21994160.
  41. Rainsford, E. (2017). Exploring youth political activism in the United Kingdom: what makes young people politically active in different organisations?. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19, 790-806. Doi: 10.1177/136914811772866.
  42. Ramírez, L. G., & Sánchez, F. A. (2010). Hacia un estado del arte sobre sentidos y prácticas políticas juveniles en Colombia. 2000-2008. In S. V. Alvarado & P. A.Vommaro (Eds.), Jóvenes, cultura y política en América Latina: algunos trayectos de sus relaciones, experiencias y lecturas 1960-2000 (1st ed., pp. 163-204). Homo Sapiens Ediciones. https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/gt/ 20120319025640/joven.pdf.
  43. Restrepo, N., Guerra, N., Aristizabal, D., & Ariza, G. (2016). Las representaciones sociales de la participación política de las mujeres lideresas de la ciudad de Medellín. Análisis desde el enfoque interseccional. Cuestiones de Género: De La Igualdad y La Diferencia, 11, 171-191. Doi: 10.18002/cg.v0i11.3629.
  44. Rochira, A., De Simone, E., Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2019). What do we talk about when we talk about participation? Sense of community and social representations of participation. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 312-328. Doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1588.
  45. Rossi, F. M. (2009). Youth political participation: Is this the end of generational cleavage?. International Sociology, 24(4), 467-497. Doi: 10.1177/0268580909334498.
  46. Sarrica, M., Grimaldi, F., & Nencini, A. (2010). Youth, citizenship and media: An exploration from the social representations perspective. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 23(4), 37-62.
  47. Taller de estudios de los jóvenes y la política, T. (2000). Jóvenes, política y sociedad: ¿desafección política o una nueva sensibilidad social?. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 06, 73-80. https://journals.openedition.org/revestudsoc/29387.
  48. Talò, C., & Mannarini, T. (2015). Measuring Participation: Development and Validation the Participatory Behaviors Scale. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 799-816. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0761-0.
  49. Teymoori, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., & Autin, F. (2016). Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie. PLoS ONE, 11(7), 1-27. Doi: 10.5061/dryad.s700k.
  50. Tuorto, D. (2018). L’attimo fuggente: Giovani e voto in Italia, tra continuità e cambiamento. il Mulino.
  51. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2021). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Cambridge University Press.
  52. Vecchione, M., Caprara, G. V., Caprara, M. G., Alessandri, G., Tabernero, C., & González-Castro, J. L. (2014). The Perceived Political Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (PPSE-S): A Validation Study in Three Mediterranean Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 48(4), 368-384. Doi: 10.1177/1069397114523924.
  53. Vergès, P. (1992). L’évocation de l’argent. Une méthode pourla définition du noyau central d’une représentation. Bulletin de psychologie, 45(405), 203-209. Doi: 10.3406/bupsy.1992.14128.
  54. Wagner, W., & Flores-Palacios, F. (2010). Apuntes sobre la epistemología de las representaciones sociales. Educación Matemática, 22(2), 139-162. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317477267_Notes_on_the_epistemology_of_social_representations.
  55. Weiss, J. (2020) What Is Youth Political Participation? Literature Review on Youth Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 2(1). Doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.00001.
  56. Zechmeister, E., & Corral, M. (2010). The varying economic meaning of ‘left’ and ‘right’ in Latin America. Americas Barometer Insights, 38, 1-10.